Investment dimensions in a universal service perspective: next generation networks, alternative funding mechanisms and public‐private partnerships

Emerald - 2008
MortenFalch1, AndersHenten1
1Associate Professor, based at the Center for Communication, Media and Information Technologies (CMI), Copenhagen Institute of Technology/Aalborg University, Ballerup, Denmark

Tóm tắt

PurposeThis paper seeks to examine the investment dimensions of next generation networks from a universal service perspective in a European context. The question is how new network infrastructures for providing access for everyone to communication, information and entertainment services in the present and future information society will be funded.Design/methodology/approachThe paper starts by looking at the range of policy measures available for promoting broadband access. This is followed by an overview of existing and upcoming access network technologies. Before concluding, there is a section on alternative funding mechanisms, including a sub‐section on the potential of private public partnerships (PPP) in providing funding for broadband access infrastructures.FindingsAlthough there is nothing in principle hindering the development of universal service policies from those that include a specific service and its underlying network technology towards more general access, other policy measures are likely to become more important in practice for the fulfilment of the universal service goal. Wide diffusion and de facto universal service will, to a higher degree, have to rely on other measures: alternative funding mechanisms and a wider range of policy measures to expand broadband take‐up.Originality/valueThe value of the paper is in its combination of two issues often discussed separately: alternative funding mechanisms and universal access. Furthermore, the implications of NGN are examined.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Australian Government (2007), Regional Telecommunications Funding, Department of Communications Information Technology and the Arts, available at: http://archive.dcita.gov.au.

Canadian‐Council‐for‐Public‐Private‐Partnerships (2007), “About PPP”, available at: http://wwwpppcouncil.ca.

CEC (2006), Bridging the Broadband Gap, COM(2006) 129 final, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.

CEC (2008), Progress Report on the Single European Electronic Communications Market 2007 (13th Report), SEC(2008) 356, European Commission, Brussels.

Cellular‐news (2008), available at: www.cellular‐news.com/story/28153.php (accessed: 15 May).

European Commission (2008), “Bridging the broadband gap, benchmarking broadband Europe”, 14‐15 May.

Falch, M. (1996), Electricity Companies and Railway Networks as Newcomers in Telecommunications. Towards Competition in Network Industries Telecommunications, Energy and Transportation in Europe and Russia, Potsdam, Springer‐Verlag.

Falch, M. (2008), “Adoption of broadband services: the role of national policies”, in Dwivedi, Y.K., Papazafeiropoulou, A. and Choudrie, J. (Eds), Handbook of Research on Global Diffusion of Broadband Data Transmission, Vol. 2, Information Science Reference/IGI‐Global, Hershey, PA, pp. 671‐88.

Fransman, M. (2006), Global Broadband Battles – Why the US and Europe Lag while Asia Leads, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.

Frieden, R. (2005), “Lessons from broadband development in Canada, Japan, Korea and the United States”, Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 29 No. 8, pp. 595‐613.

Giles, T., Markendahl, J., Zander, J., Zetterberg, P., Karlsson, P., Malmgren, G. and Nilsson, J. (2004), “Cost drivers and deployment scenarios for future broadband wireless networks – key research problems and directions for research”, 2004 IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, 17‐19 May, 2004, Milan, Italy.

Grooten, A. (2006), “Reducing CAPEX and OPEX in FTTH networks”, Europe at the speed of Light, 25‐26 January, Vienna.

ITST (2008), Telecom Statistics – Second Half of 2007, National IT and Telecom Agency, Copenhagen.

Latteman, C. et al. (2006), “eServices as pull strategies within public private partnerships – evidence from case studies”, University of Potsdam.

Montagne, R. (2007), Bridging the Broadband Gap, Benchmarking Broadband Europe, European Commission, Brussels, 14‐15 May.

OECD (2008), Broadband Portal, available at: www.oecd.org.

Papadias, L., Riedl, A. and Westerhof, J.G. (2006), “Public funding for broadband networks – recent developments”, Competition Policy Newsletter, No. 3, Autumn.

Point‐topic (2008), “Lyse Tele”, available at: www.point‐topic.com (accessed on 20 May 2008).

Tadayoni, R. and Sigurdsson, H. (2005), “Drivers and barriers for development of alternative broadband”, CICT Working Papers, CICT, DTU, Lyngby, pp. 2‐31.

Tadayoni, R. and Sigurdsson, H. (2007), “Development of alternative broadband infrastructures – case studies from Denmark”, Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 331‐47.

Techcrunchies (2008), “3G subscription penetration worldwide”, available at: http://techcrunchies.com/3g‐subscription‐penetration‐worldwide (accessed 20 May, 2008).

van Daele, P. et al. (2005), Broadband in Europe for All: A Multidisciplinary Approach, FP6‐IST‐507554/JCP/R/Pub/D2.3‐3.3, CEC, Brussels.

Wireless‐Cities (2006), “Situation of wireless services and wireless infrastructure”, Interreg IIIC, available at: www.wirelesscities.org.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Thông tin tác giả