Investigative advising: a job for Bayes

Alison L, Rainbow L (Eds): Professionalizing offender profiling: forensic and investigative psychology in practice. London: Routledge; 2011.

Alison L, Smith MD, Eastman O, Rainbow L: Toulmins philosophy of argument and its relevance to offender profiling. Psychol Crime Law 2003, 9(2):173–183. 10.1080/1068316031000116265

Allen JC, Goodwill AM, Watters K, Beauregard E: Base rates and Bayes’ theorem for decision support. Policing: An Int J Police Strateg Manage in press.

Almond L, Alison L, Porter L: An evaluation and comparison of claims made in behavioural investigative advice reports compiled by the National Policing Improvement Agency in the United Kingdom. In Professionalizing offender profiling: forensic and investigative psychology in practice. Edited by: Alison L, Rainbow L. London: Routledge; 2011:250–263.

Blair JP, Rossmo DK: Evidence in context: Bayes’ theorem and investigations. Police Q 2010, 13: 123–135. 10.1177/1098611110365686

De Morgan A: An essay on probabilities and their application to life contingencies and insurance offices. London: Longman, Orme, Brown, Green, & Longmans; 1838.

Donaldson T, Wollert R: A mathematical proof and example that Bayes’s theorem is fundamental to actuarial estimates of sexual recidivism risk. Sex Abuse 2008, 20(2):206–217.

Doren DM: Battling with Bayes: when statistical analyses just won’t do. Sex Offender Law Report 2006, 7(4):49–50. 60–61 60–61

Dowden C, Bennell C, Bloomfield S: Advances in offender profiling: a systematic review of the profiling literature published over the past three decades. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology 2007, 22: 44–56. 10.1007/s11896-007-9000-9

Gill J: Bayesian methods, a social and behavioural sciences approach. 2nd edition. London: CRC Press; 2009.

McGrayne SB: The theory that would not die: how Bayes’ rule cracked the enigma code, hunted down Russian submarines, and emerged triumphant from two centuries of controversy. New York: Yale University Press; 2011.

Popper K: Objective knowledge: an evolutionary approach. London: Oxford University Press; 1972.

Rainbow L: The UK approach to the management of behavioural investigative advice. In Professionalizing offender profiling: forensic and investigative psychology in practice. Edited by: Alison L, Rainbow L. London: Routledge; 2011:5–17.

Rainbow L, Almond L, Alison L: BIA support to investigative decision making. In Professionalizing offender profiling: forensic and investigative psychology in practice. Edited by: Alison L, Rainbow L. London: Routledge; 2011:35–50.

Rossmo DK: Geographic profiling. New York: CRC Press; 2000.

Rossmo DK: Geographic profiling in serial rape investigations. In Practical aspects of rape investigation: a multidisciplinary approach. 4th edition. Edited by: Hazelwood RR, Burgess AW. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2009:139–170.

Salo B, Sirén J, Corander J, Zappalà A, Bosco D, Mokros A, Santtila P: Using Bayes’ theorem in behavioural crime linking of serial homicide. Leg Criminol Psychol 2012. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/j.2044–8333.2011.02043.x

Schneps L, Colmez C: Math on trial: how numbers get used and abused in the courtroom. New York: Basic Books; 2013.

Tartoni F, Aitken C, Garbolino P, Biedermann A: Bayesian networks and probabilistic inference in forensic science. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; 2006.

Wells GL, Turtle JW: Eyewitness identification: the importance of lineup models. Psychol Bull 1986, 99(3):320–329.

Wollert R: Poor diagnostic reliability, the null-Bayes logic model, and their implications for sexually violent predator evaluations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 2007, 13(3):167–203.

Woodhams J, Bull R, Hollin C: Case linkage-identifying crimes committed by the same offender. In Kocsis (Ed.), Criminal profiling: International theory, research, and practice (pp. 117–133). Totowa, NJ: Humana Press Inc.; 2007.