Investigating the relation between instantaneous driving decisions and safety critical events in naturalistic driving environment

Accident Analysis & Prevention - Tập 156 - Trang 106086 - 2021
Zulqarnain H. Khattak1, Michael D. Fontaine2, Wan Li1, Asad J. Khattak3, Thomas Karnowski1
1Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, 37830, TN, United States
2Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, United States
3University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ahmed, 2018, Effects of truck traffic on crash injury severity on rural highways in Wyoming using Bayesian binary logit models, Accid. Anal. Prev., 117, 106, 10.1016/j.aap.2018.04.011 Ali, 2019, Detection of critical safety events on freeways in clear and rainy weather using SHRP2 naturalistic driving data: parametric and non-parametric techniques, Saf. Sci., 119, 141, 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.01.007 Arvin, 2019, The role of pre-crash driving instability in contributing to crash intensity using naturalistic driving data, Accid. Anal. Prev., 132 Asirt, 2016 Behnood, 2017, The eff ;ects of drug and alcohol consumption on driver injury severities in single-vehicle crashes, Traffic Inj. Prev., 18, 10.1080/15389588.2016.1262540 Ben-Akiva, 1985 Boyle, 2008, Driver performance in the moments surrounding a microsleep, Transp. Res. Part F, 11 Campbell, 2012, The SHRP 2 naturalistic driving study: addressing driver performance and behavior in trafc safety, TR News, 282 Chatterjee, 2015 Fitch, 2015, Drivers’ visual behavior when using handheld and hands-free cell phones, J. Safety Res., 105 Gaweesh, 2019, Evaluating the safety effectiveness of a weather- based variable speed limit for a rural mountainous freeway in Wyoming variable speed limit for a rural mountainous freeway, J. Transp. Saf. Secur., 0, 1 Ghasemzadeh, 2017, Drivers’ lane-keeping ability in heavy rain: preliminary investigation using SHRP 2 naturalistic driving study data, Transp. Res. Rec., 2663, 10.3141/2663-13 Ghasemzadeh, 2018, Utilizing naturalistic driving data for in-depth analysis of driver lane-keeping behavior in rain: non-parametric MARS and parametric logistic regression modeling approaches, Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol., 90, 10.1016/j.trc.2018.03.018 Ghasemzadeh, 2018, Parametric ordinal logistic regression and non-parametric decision tree approaches for assessing the impact of weather conditions on driver speed selection using naturalistic driving data, Transp. Res. Rec., 2672, 2, 10.1177/0361198118758035 Greene, 2008 Haghighi, 2018, Impact of roadway geometric features on crash severity on rural two-lane highways, Accid. Anal. Prev., 111 Halton, 1960, On the efficiency of evaluating certain quasi-random sequences of points in evaluating multi-dimensional integrals, Numer. Math., 2, 84, 10.1007/BF01386213 Hankey, 2016 Hassan, 2017, Investigation of drivers’ behavior towards speeds using crash data and self-reported questionnaire, Accid. Anal. Prev., 98 Henclewood, 2014 Hu, 2010, Median barrier crash severity: some new insights, Accid. Anal. Prev., 42, 1697, 10.1016/j.aap.2010.04.009 Jovanis, 2011, Analysis of naturalistic driving event data: omitted-variable bias and multilevel modeling approaches, Transp. Res. Rec., 2236 Khattak, 2020, A Bayesian modeling framework for crash severity effects of active traffic management systems, Accid. Anal. Prev., 145, 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105544 Khattak, 2017, Estimating safety effects of adaptive signal control technology using the empirical bayes method, J. Safety Res. Khattak, 2017, Using new mode choice model nesting structures to address emerging policy questions: a case study of the Pittsburgh Central Business District, Sustainability, 10.3390/su9112120 Khattak, 2018, Evaluating the impact of adaptive signal control technology on driver stress and behavior using real-world experimental data, Transp. Res. Part F, 58, 133, 10.1016/j.trf.2018.06.006 Khattak, 2019, Operational performance evaluation of adaptive traffic control systems: a Bayesian modeling approach using real-world GPS and private sector PROBE data, J. Intell. Transp. Syst. Khattak, 2019, Crash severity effects of adaptive signal control technology: An empirical assessment with insights from Pennsylvania and Virginia, Accid. Anal. Prev., 154, 151, 10.1016/j.aap.2019.01.008 Khattak, 2020, Exploratory investigation of disengagements and crashes in autonomous vehicles under mixed traffic: an endogenous switching regime framework, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 10.1109/TITS.2020.3003527 Khattak, 2020, Cooperative lane control application for fully connected and automated vehicles at multilane freeways, Transp. Res. Part C, 111, 294, 10.1016/j.trc.2019.11.007 Klauer, 2006 Kluger, 2016, Identification of safety-critical events using kinematic vehicle data and the discrete fourier transform, Accid. Anal. Prev., 96, 162, 10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.006 Lefèvre, 2014, A survey on motion prediction and risk assessment for intelligent vehicles, ROBOMECH J., 10.1186/s40648-014-0001-z Lento, 2007, Investment information content in Bollinger Bands?, Appl. Financ. Econ. Lett., 3, 4, 10.1080/17446540701206576 Mannering, 2009, An empirical analysis of driver perceptions of the relationship between speed limits and safety, Transp. Res. Part F, 12 McFadden, 1981, Econometric models of probabilistic choice Milton, 2008, Highway accident severities and the mixed logit model: an exploratory empirical analysis, Accid. Anal. Prev., 40, 260, 10.1016/j.aap.2007.06.006 Mitchell, 2014, Work and non-work-related vehicle crashes: the contribution of risky driving practices, Saf. Sci., 68 Naik, 2016, Weather impacts on single-vehicle truck crash injury severity, J. Safety Res., 58 NHTSA, 2015 Osman, 2019 Perez, 2017, Performance of basic kinematic thresholds in the identification of crash and near-crash events within naturalistic driving data, Accid. Anal. Prev., 103, 10, 10.1016/j.aap.2017.03.005 Rakauskas, 2004, Effects of naturalistic cell phone conversations on driving performance, J. Safety Res., 35, 4, 10.1016/j.jsr.2004.06.003 Richard, 2020, Using SHRP2 naturalistic driving data to examine driver speeding behavior, J. Safety Res., 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.03.008 Scott-Parker, 2017, Young driver risky behaviour and predictors of crash risk in Australia, New Zealand and Colombia: same but diff ;erent?, Accid. Anal. Prev., 99 Smorti, 2014, Sensation seeking, parental bond, and risky driving in adolescence: some relationships, matter more to girls than boys, Saf. Sci., 70 Train, 2003 TRB, 2013 Wali, 2020, Harnessing ambient sensing & naturalistic driving systems to understand links between driving volatility and crash propensity in school zones – a generalized hierarchical mixed logit framework, Transp. Res. Part C, 114, 10.1016/j.trc.2020.01.028 Wali, 2018, How is driving volatility related to intersection safety? A Bayesian heterogeneity-based analysis of instrumented vehicles data, Transp. Res. Part C, 92, 504, 10.1016/j.trc.2018.05.017 Wali, 2019, Exploring microscopic driving volatility in naturalistic driving environment prior to involvement in safety critical events—Concept of event-based driving volatility, Accid. Anal. Prev., 132 Wang, 2015, What is the level of volatility in instantaneous driving decisions?, Transp. Res. Part C, 58, 413, 10.1016/j.trc.2014.12.014 Washington, 2011 Weng, 2012, Eff ;ects of environment, vehicle and driver characteristics on risky driving behavior at work zones, Saf. Sci., 50 Xie, 2018, Investigation of hit-and-run crash occurrence and severity using real-time loop detector data and hierarchical Bayesian binary logit model with random effects, Traffic Inj. Prev., 19, 2, 10.1080/15389588.2017.1371302 Yan, 2008, Validating a driving simulator using surrogate safety measures, Accid. Anal. Prev., 40 Ye, 2017, Detection of driver engagement in secondary tasks from observed naturalistic driving behavior, Accid. Anal. Prev., 106, 385, 10.1016/j.aap.2017.07.010