Investigating Approximate Methods to Predict Residual Interstory Drift Ratio Demands in Steel Eccentrically Braced Frames
Tóm tắt
Residual drifts after earthquakes are important for decision-making about repairing or rebuilding a structure. There are some approximate methods that predict the residual drift demands of structures after earthquakes. Most of the approximate methods have been proposed for structures with moment resisting systems. Recent studies have shown that eccentrically braced frames (EBFs) can have considerable residual drifts after earthquakes. In the present study, the capability of approximate methods (including the Erochko et al., FEMA P-58, and coefficients methods) for predicting residual interstory drift ratio (RIDR) demands in low- to mid-rise steel EBFs is evaluated, given different ground motion intensities. Two types of connections (i.e., fixed and pinned) are considered for the EBFs. It is shown that these approximate methods cannot accurately predict the RIDRs in the EBFs, and the obtained predictions are significantly over-predicted in some cases. Furthermore, it is shown that the RIDR profile can considerably differ by changing the type of connections. By applying the particle swarm optimization algorithm, a new method is proposed for more precisely predicting the median RIDR profile in the EBFs. Additionally, the coefficients method is adjusted to more precisely predict the median of maximum RIDRs in the EBFs.
Tài liệu tham khảo
AISC 360-16. (2016). Specification for structural steel buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, USA.
AISC 341-16. (2016). Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, USA.
Amiri, S., & Bojórquez, E. (2019). Residual displacement ratios of structures under mainshock-aftershock sequences. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 121, 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.03.021
ASCE 41-17. (2017). Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia, USA
ASCE 7-16. (2017). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia, USA
Asgarkhani, N., Yakhchalian, M., & Mohebi, B. (2020). Evaluation of approximate methods for estimating residual drift demands in BRBFs. Engineering Structures, 224, 110849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110849
Chen, J., Wang, Y., & Zhan, X. (2021). Topology optimization of steel structure for waste incineration steam generator based on DE and PSO. International Journal of Steel Structures, 21, 1210–1227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-021-00497-8
Chen, L., Tremblay, R., & Tirca, L. (2019). Modular tied eccentrically braced frames for improved seismic response of tall buildings. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 155, 370–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.01.005
Erochko, J., Christopoulos, C., Tremblay, R., & Choi, H. (2011). Residual drift response of SMRFs and BRB frames in steel buildings designed according to ASCE 7-05. Journal of Structural Engineering, 137(5), 589–599. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000296
ETABS. (2017). ETABS extended 3D analysis of building systems software CSi. Computers and Structures, Inc.
Fajfar, P., & Krawinkler, H. (2004). Performance-based seismic design concepts and implementation. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop, Bled, Slovenia.
FEMA P-58-1. (2012). Seismic performance assessment of buildings volume 1: methodology. Washington DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Gardiner, S., Clifton, G. C., & MacRae, G. A. (2013). Performance, damage assessment and repair of a multistorey eccentrically braced framed building following the Christchurch earthquake series. In: Proceedings of Steel Innovations Conference, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Haselton, C. B., & Deierlein, G. G. (2008). Assessing seismic collapse safety of modern reinforced concrete moment-frame buildings. Report, Pacific Engineering Research Center, PEER Report 2007/08, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
Haselton, C. B. (2019). Implications of recent FEMA P-58 methodology advancements for resilient BRBF design. In: Proceedings of NASCC Steel Conference, American Institute of Steel Construction, St. Louis, USA.
Kitayama, S., & Constantinou, M. C. (2018). Seismic performance of buildings with viscous damping systems designed by the procedures of ASCE/SEI 7-16. Journal of Structural Engineering, 144(6), 04018050. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002048
Koboevic, S., Rozon, J., & Tremblay, R. (2012). Seismic performance of low-to-moderate height eccentrically braced steel frames designed for North American seismic conditions. Journal of Structural Engineering, 138(12), 1465–1476. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000433
Luco, N., Bazzurro, P., & Cornell, C. A. (2004). Dynamic versus static computation of the residual capacity of a mainshock damaged building to withstand an aftershock. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 2405. Vancouver, Canada.
MacRae, G. A., Clifton, G. C., Bruneau, M., Kanvinde, A., & Gardiner, S. (2015). Lessons from steel structures in Christchurch earthquakes. In: Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Behavior of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas, Shanghai, China.
Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F. H., Scott, M. L., & Fenves, G. (2006). OpenSees Command Language Manual. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA
PEER NGA. (2018). PEER NGA-West2 Database. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/.
NIST. (2010). Evaluation of the FEMA P695 Methodology for Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Report no. NIST GCR 10-917-8, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
NIST. (2015). Assessment of First Generation Performance-Based Seismic Design Methods for New Steel Buildings, Volume 3: Eccentrically Braced Frames. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Report no. NIST technical note 1863-3, Gaithersburg, Maryland. Doi:https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.TN.1863-3
OpenSees. (2017). Open system for earthquake engineering simulation, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. http://opensees.berkeley.edu.
Pampanin, S., Christopoulos, C., & Nigel Priestley, M. J. (2003). Performance-based seismic response of frame structures including residual deformations part II: Multi-degree of freedom systems. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 7(1), 119–147.
Poli, R., Kennedy, J., & Blackwell, T. (2007). Particle swarm optimization. Swarm Intelligence, 1(1), 33–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11721-007-0002-0
Pourkeramat, P., Ghiasi, V., & Mohebi, B. (2021). The effect of post-earthquake fire on the performance of steel moment frames subjected to different ground motion intensities. International Journal of Steel Structures, 21, 1197–1209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-021-00496-9
Prinz, G. S. (2010). Using buckling-restrained braces in eccentric configurations. Ph.D. dissertation, Brigham Young University, Utah, USA. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/2134
Ramadan, T., & Ghobarah, A. (1995). Analytical model for shear-link behavior. Journal of Structural Engineering, 121(11), 1574–1580. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:11(1574)
Richards, P. W., & Uang, C. M. (2006). Testing protocol for short links in eccentrically braced frames. Journal of Structural Engineering, 132(8), 1183–1191. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:8(1183)
Roshanfekr Rad, Z., Ghobadi, M. S., & Yakhchalian, M. (2019). Probabilistic seismic collapse and residual drift assessment of smart buildings equipped with shape memory alloy connections. Engineering Structures, 197, 109375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109375
Rouhi, A., & Hamidi, H. (2021). Development of performance based plastic design of EBF steel structures subjected to forward directivity effect. International Journal of Steel Structures, 21, 1092–1107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-021-00491-0
Ruiz-García, J., & Chora, C. (2015). Evaluation of approximate methods to estimate residual drift demands in steel framed buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 44(15), 2837–2854. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2611
Ruiz-García, J., & Miranda, E. (2006a). Evaluation of residual drift demands in regular multi-storey frames for performance-based seismic assessment. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 35(13), 1609–1629. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.593
Ruiz-García, J., & Miranda, E. (2006b). Residual displacement ratios for assessment of existing structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 35(3), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.523
Salimbahrami, S. R., & Naghipour, M. (2021). Numerical study to evaluate the effect of ductile element in the seismic performance of steel frames with EBF. International Journal of Steel Structures, 21, 549–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-021-00455-4
Yahyazadeh, A., & Yakhchalian, M. (2018). Probabilistic residual drift assessment of SMRFs with linear and nonlinear viscous dampers. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 148, 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.05.031
Yakhchalian, M., Asgarkhani, N., & Yakhchalian, M. (2020). Evaluation of deflection amplification factor for steel buckling restrained braced frames. Journal of Building Engineering, 30, 101228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101228
Yakhchalian, M., Yakhchalian, M., & Asgarkhani, N. (2021). An advanced intensity measure for residual drift assessment of steel BRB frames. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 19(4), 1931–1955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01051-x