Inverse and Direct Cancer Comorbidity in People with Central Nervous System Disorders: A Meta-Analysis of Cancer Incidence in 577,013 Participants of 50 Observational Studies

Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics - Tập 83 Số 2 - Trang 89-105 - 2014
Ferrán Catalá-López1, Marta Suárez‐Pinilla2, Paula Suárez‐Pinilla3, José M Valderas4, Manuel Gómez-Beneyto3, Salvador Martı́nez5, Vicent Balanzá‐Martínez3, Joan Climent6, Alfonso Valencia7, John J. McGrath8, Benedicto Crespo‐Facorro3, José Sánchez‐Moreno3, Eduard Vieta3, Rafael Tabarés‐Seisdedos3,6,9
1Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance, Spanish Medicines and Healthcare Products Agency,
2Department of Neurology, Asturias Central Hospital, Oviedo,
3Centro Investigación Biomédica en Red Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), and
4NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Health Services and Policy Research Group, Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
5Instituto de Neurociencias de Alicante, Universidad Miguel Hernandez-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC), San Juan de Alicante, and
6Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Valencia (INCLIVA), Valencia,
7Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid
8Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
9Teaching Unit of Psychiatry and Psychological Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Valencia, and

Tóm tắt

<b><i>Background:</i></b> There is a lack of scientific consensus about cancer comorbidity in people with central nervous system (CNS) disorders. This study assesses the co-occurrence of cancers in patients with CNS disorders, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), autism spectrum disorders, Down's syndrome (DS), Huntington's disease (HD), multiple sclerosis (MS), Parkinson's disease (PD) and schizophrenia (SCZ). <b><i>Method:</i></b> Comprehensive search in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and ISI Web of Knowledge of the literature published before March 2013. We identified 51 relevant articles from 2,229 discrete references, 50 of which contained data suitable for quantitative synthesis (577,013 participants). Pooled effect sizes (ES) were calculated using multiple random-effects meta-analyses. Sources of heterogeneity and uncertainty were explored by means of subgroup and sensitivity analyses, respectively. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The presence of CNS disorders was associated with a reduced co-occurrence of cancer (ES = 0.92; 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.87-0.98; I<sup>2</sup> = 94.5%). A consistently lower overall co-occurrence of cancer was detected in patients with neurodegenerative disorders (ES = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.75- 0.86; I<sup>2</sup> = 82.8%), and in those with AD (ES = 0.32; 95% CI: 0.22-0.46; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%), PD (ES = 0.83; 95% CI: 0.76-0.91; I<sup>2</sup> = 80.0%), MS (ES = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.87-0.95; I<sup>2</sup> = 30.3%) and HD (ES = 0.53; 95% CI: 0.42-0.67; I<sup>2</sup> = 56.4%). Patients with DS had a higher overall co-occurrence of cancer (ES = 1.46; 95% CI: 1.08-1.96; I<sup>2</sup> = 87.9%). No association was observed between cancer and ALS (ES = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.76-1.25; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%) or SCZ (ES = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.90-1.07; I<sup>2</sup> = 96.3%). Patients with PD, MS and SCZ showed (a) higher co-occurrence of some specific cancers (e.g. PD with melanoma, MS with brain cancers and SCZ with breast cancer), and (b) lower co-occurrence of other specific cancers (e.g. lung, prostate and colorectal cancers in PD; lung and prostate cancers in MS; and melanoma and prostate cancer in SCZ). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Increased and decreased co-occurrence of cancer in patients with CNS disorders represents an opportunity to discover biological and non-biological connections between these complex disorders.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2812%2960240-2

10.1370%2Fafm.983

10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2899%2905264-2

10.1111%2Fj.1600-0447.2008.01163.x

10.1007%2Fs10552-009-9497-6

10.1016%2FS1470-2045%2811%2970041-9

10.1136%2Fbmj.e1442

10.4088%2FJCP.08lr04991

10.1038%2Fmp.2009.2

10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2812%2961689-4

10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2812%2961728-0

10.1016%2FS1470-2045%2808%2970336-X

10.1200%2FJCO.2009.27.0579

10.1016%2FS1470-2045%2810%2970085-1

10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2808%2961341-0

10.1136%2Fbmj.b2535

10.1016%2F0197-2456%2886%2990046-2

10.2307%2F3001666

10.1136%2Fbmj.327.7414.557

10.1002%2Fsim.1186

10.1212%2F01.WNL.0000152889.94785.51

10.1212%2FWNL.0b013e3181c91873

10.1002%2Fana.410170514

10.1136%2Fbmj.310.6993.1500

10.1007%2Fs004150070171

10.1038%2Fsj.bjc.6602279

10.1002%2Fmds.20401

10.1002%2Fmds.23246

10.1016%2Fj.parkreldis.2009.11.005

10.1136%2Fjnnp.2009.175463

10.1159%2F000331489

10.1002%2Fijc.27443

10.1001%2Farchneurol.2010.1

10.1111%2Fj.1600-0404.1996.tb00019.x

10.1159%2F000079947

10.1007%2Fs10549-004-2229-4

10.1002%2Fijc.21437

10.1177%2F1352458507083625

10.1212%2F01.wnl.0000345366.10455.62

10.1093%2Fbrain%2Faws148

10.1136%2Fjech.58.2.142

10.1034%2Fj.1600-0447.2000.101005382.x

10.1001%2Farchpsyc.58.6.573

10.1002%2Fcncr.21574

10.1016%2Fj.schres.2004.06.016

10.1016%2Fj.schres.2004.11.009

10.1192%2Fbjp.187.4.334

10.1016%2Fj.schres.2011.02.018

10.1093%2Fschbul%2Fsbr162

10.1093%2Fschbul%2Fsbs065

10.1176%2Fappi.ps.201100169

10.1001%2Fjamapsychiatry.2013.278

10.1176%2Fappi.ajp.2012.12050599

10.1111%2Fcas.12094

10.1016%2Fj.schres.2012.11.009

10.1016%2FS0920-9964%2802%2900430-9

10.1001%2Farchpsyc.64.12.1368

10.1016%2Fj.schres.2008.03.017

10.1136%2Fadc.2003.046219

10.1002%2Fijc.1383

10.1002%2Fijc.21518

10.1111%2Fj.1365-2788.2006.00862.x

10.1158%2F1055-9965.EPI-07-2630

10.1002%2F%28SICI%291097-0142%2819991001%2986%3A7%3C1342%3A%3AAID-CNCR33%3E3.0.CO%3B2-3

10.1016%2FS1470-2045%2812%2970132-8

10.1023%2FA%3A1014840622023

10.1159%2F000343508

10.1038%2Fnrn3464

10.1038%2Fnrc3150

10.1016%2FS1470-2045%2810%2970177-7

10.1038%2Fnrc3355

10.1176%2Fappi.ajp.2013.12101352

10.1016%2FS1470-2045%2809%2970337-7

10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2812%2961688-2

10.1126%2Fscience.1229493

10.1016%2Fj.euroneuro.2013.04.001

10.1159%2F000337746