Introduction: Distributive and procedural justice

Social Justice Research - Tập 9 - Trang 305-310 - 1996
Riël Vermunt1, Kjell Törnblom2
1Department of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
2Department of Sociology, University of Colorado, Denver

Tài liệu tham khảo

Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2, Academic Press, New York, pp. 267–299. Folger, R. (1987). Reformulating the preconditions of resentment: A referent cognitions model. In Masters, J., and Smith, W. (eds.),Social Comparison, Social Justice, and Relative Deprivation: Theoretical, Empirical, and Policy Perspectives, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. Folger, R., and Konovsky, M. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice reactions to pay raise decisions.Acad. Manage. J. 32: 115–130. Greenberg, J. (1986). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluation.J. Appl. Psychol. 71: 340–342. Lind, E. A., Kanfer, R., and Early, P. C. (1990). Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgements.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 59: 952–959. Lind, E. A., Kulik, C. T., Ambrose, M., and De Vera Park, M. V. (1993). Individual and corporate dispute resolution: Using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic.Admin. Sci. Quart. 38: 224–251. Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. R. (1988).The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, Plenum Press, New York. Messick, D. M., and Sentis, K. (1983). Fairness, preference, and fairness baises. In Messick, D. M., and Cook, K. S., (eds.),Equity Theory: Psychological and Sociological Perspectives, Praeger, New York, pp. 61–94. Rawls, J. (1971).A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Sheppard, B. H., and Lewicki, R. J. (1987). Toward general principles of managerial fairness.Soc. Justice Res. 1: 161–176. Thibaut, J., and Walker, L. (1975).Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. Törnblom, K. Y. (1992). The social psychology of distributive justice. In Scherer, K. (ed.),Distributive Justice from an Interdisciplinary Perspective, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 177–284. Tyler, T. R. (1984). The role of perceived injustice in defendants' evaluations of their courtroom experience.Law Soc. Rev. 18: 51–74. Tyler, T. R. (1989). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 57: 830–838. Tyler, T. R. (1994). Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 67: 850–863 Tyler, T. R., and Folger, R. (1980). Distributional and procedural aspects of satisfaction with citizen-police encounters.Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 1: 281–292. Tyler, T. R., and Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In Zanna, M. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychol, Vol. 25, Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 115–191. Van den Bos, K., Vermunt, R., and Wilke, H. (in press). Procedural and distributive justice: What is fair depends more on what comes first than on what comes next.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Walster, E., Walster, G. W., and Berscheid, E. (1978).Equity: Theory and Research, Allyn & Bacon, Boston.