Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Coronary Angiography-Guided Complex PCI: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Mohamed Hāmed1, Sheref Mohamed2, Mohamed E. Mahmoud3, Jonathan Kahan1, Amr Mohsen4, Faisal Rahman5, Waleed Tallat Kayani6, Fernándo Alfonso7, Emmanouil S. Brilakis8, Islam Y. Elgendy9, Mamas A. Mamas10, Ayman Elbadawi11
1Division of Cardiology, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
2Department of Cardiology, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
3Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
4Division of Cardiology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA
5Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
6Division of Cardiology Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
7Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, IIS-IP, CIBER-CV, Madrid, Spain
8Division of Cardiology, Minneapolis Heart Institute, Minneapolis, MN, USA
9Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gill Heart Institute, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
10Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Keele University, Keele, UK
11Division of Cardiology, Christus Good Shepherd Medical Center, Longview, TX, USA

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Suero JA, Marso SP, Jones PG, et al. Procedural outcomes and long-term survival among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention of a chronic total occlusion in native coronary arteries: a 20-year experience. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38(2):409–14.

Patel MR, Marso SP, Dai D, et al. Comparative effectiveness of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in elderly patients undergoing revascularization of chronic total coronary occlusions: results from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry, 2005–2008. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5(10):1054–61.

Van den Branden BJ, Rahel BM, Laarman GJ, et al. Five-year clinical outcome after primary stenting of totally occluded native coronary arteries: a randomised comparison of bare metal stent implantation with sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of total coronary occlusions (PRISON II study). EuroIntervention. 2012;7(10):1189–96.

Rathore S, Katoh O, Matsuo H, et al. Retrograde percutaneous recanalization of chronic total occlusion of the coronary arteries: procedural outcomes and predictors of success in contemporary practice. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2(2):124–32.

Ramadan R, Boden WE, Kinlay S. Management of left main coronary artery disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(7):e008151.

Park DW, Park SJ. Intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for left main disease: does procedural fine-tuning make a relevant clinical benefit? Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(5):e005293.

Yamamoto K, Shiomi H, Morimoto T, et al. Optimal intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease. JACC Asia. 2023;3(2):211–25.

Gaster AL, Slothuus Skjoldborg U, Larsen J, et al. Continued improvement of clinical outcome and cost effectiveness following intravascular ultrasound guided PCI: insights from a prospective, randomised study. Heart. 2003;89(9):1043–9.

Darmoch F, Alraies MC, Al-Khadra Y, et al. Intravascular ultrasound imaging-guided versus coronary angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(5): e013678.

De Franco AC, Nissen SE. Coronary intravascular ultrasound: implications for understanding the development and potential regression of atherosclerosis. Am J Cardiol. 2001;88(10A):7M–20M.

Elgendy IY, Ha LD, Elbadawi A, et al. Temporal trends in inpatient use of intravascular imaging among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(9):913–5.

Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022;145(3):e4–17.

Räber L, Mintz SG, Koskinas CK, et al. Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 1: guidance and optimization of coronary interventions. An expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. EuroIntervention. 2018;14(6):656–77.

Johnson WT, Räber L, Di Mario C, et al. Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 2: acute coronary syndromes, ambiguous coronary angiography findings, and guiding interventional decision-making: an expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. EuroIntervention. 2019;15(5):434–51.

Jakabcin J, Spacek R, Bystron M, et al. Long-term health outcome and mortality evaluation after invasive coronary treatment using drug eluting stents with or without the IVUS guidance. Randomized control trial. HOME DES IVUS. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;75(4):578–83.

Chieffo A, Latib A, Caussin C, et al. A prospective, randomized trial of intravascular-ultrasound guided compared to angiography guided stent implantation in complex coronary lesions: the AVIO trial. Am Heart J. 2013;165(1):65–72.

Kim BK, Shin DH, Hong MK, et al. Clinical impact of intravascular ultrasound-guided chronic total occlusion intervention with zotarolimus-eluting versus biolimus-eluting stent implantation: randomized study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(7): e002592.

Tian NL, Gami SK, Ye F, et al. Angiographic and clinical comparisons of intravascular ultrasound- versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation for patients with chronic total occlusion lesions: two-year results from a randomised AIR-CTO study. EuroIntervention. 2015;10(12):1409–17.

Hong SJ, Mintz GS, Ahn CM, et al. Effect of Intravascular ultrasound-guided drug-eluting stent implantation: 5-year follow-up of the IVUS-XPL randomized trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(1):62–71.

Gao XF, Ge Z, Kong XQ, et al. 3-year outcomes of the ULTIMATE trial comparing intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14(3):247–57.

Lee JM, Choi KH, Song YB, et al. Intravascular imaging-guided or angiography-guided complex PCI. N Engl J Med. 2023:388(18):1668–79.

Tan Q, Wang Q, Liu D, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-guided unprotected left main coronary artery stenting in the elderly. Saudi Med J. 2015;36(5):549–53.

Kim JS, Kang TS, Mintz GS, et al. Randomized comparison of clinical outcomes between intravascular ultrasound and angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation for long coronary artery stenoses. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(4):369–76.

Liu XM, Yang ZM, Liu XK, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-guided drug-eluting stent implantation for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery lesions: a single-center randomized trial. Anatol J Cardiol. 2019;21(2):83–90.

Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000100.

Applegate RJ, Sacrinty MT, Little WC, et al. Incidence of coronary stent thrombosis based on academic research consortium definitions. Am J Cardiol. 2008;102(6):683–8.

Garcia-Garcia HM, McFadden EP, Farb A, et al. Standardized end point definitions for coronary intervention trials: the Academic Research Consortium-2 Consensus Document. Circulation. 2018;137(24):2635–50.

Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.

Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–60.

Elgendy IY, Mahmoud AN, Elgendy AY, et al. Outcomes with intravascular ultrasound-guided stent implantation: a meta-analysis of randomized trials in the era of drug-eluting stents. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(4): e003700.

Buccheri S, Franchina G, Romano S, et al. Clinical outcomes following intravascular imaging-guided versus coronary angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of 31 studies and 17,882 patients. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(24):2488–98.

Shin DH, Hong SJ, Mintz GS, et al. Effects of intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided new-generation drug-eluting stent implantation: meta-analysis with individual patient-level data from 2,345 randomized patients. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(21):2232–9.

Elgendy IY, Gad M, Mintz GS. Meta-analysis of intravascular ultrasound-guided drug-eluting stent implantation for left main coronary disease. Am J Cardiol. 2020;1(128):92–3.

Elgendy IY, Mahmoud AN, Elgendy AY, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-guidance is associated with lower cardiovascular mortality and myocardial infarction for drug-eluting stent implantation—insights from an updated meta-analysis of randomized trials. Circ J. 2019;83(6):1410–3.

Bhogal S, Hashim H, Merdler I, et al. Impact of IVUS and OCT on physician decision-making during post-PCI optimization. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023;55:96–8.

Barus P, Piasecki A, Gumiezna K, et al. Multimodality OCT, IVUS and FFR evaluation of coronary intermediate grade lesions in women vs. men. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023;10:1021023.

Chamié D, Costa JR, Damiani LP, et al. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound and angiography to guide percutaneous coronary interventions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14(3):e009452.

Kang D-Y, Ahn J-M, Yun S-C, et al. Optical coherence tomography-guided or intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: the OCTIVUS randomized clinical trial. Circulation. 2023;148(16):1195–206.

Lee PH, Ahn JM, Chang M, et al. Left main coronary artery disease: secular trends in patient characteristics, treatments, and outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(11):1233–46.

Carrie D, Eltchaninoff H, Lefevre T, et al. Early and long-term results of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis with paclitaxel-eluting stents: the FRIEND (French multicentre RegIstry for stenting of uNprotecteD LMCA stenosis) registry. EuroIntervention. 2011;7(6):680–8.

Alberti A, Giudice P, Gelera A, et al. Understanding the economic impact of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Eur J Health Econ. 2016;17(2):185–93.

Ali ZA, Maehara A, Genereux P, et al. Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388(10060):2618–28.

Allali A, Traboulsi H, Sulimov DS, et al. Feasibility and safety of minimal-contrast IVUS-guided rotational atherectomy for complex calcified coronary artery disease. Clin Res Cardiol. 2021;110(10):1668–79.

Sakakura K, Yamamoto K, Taniguchi Y, et al. Intravascular ultrasound enhances the safety of rotational atherectomy. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018;19(3 Pt A):286–91.

Ladwiniec A, Walsh SJ, Holm NR, et al. Intravascular ultrasound to guide left main stem intervention: a NOBLE trial substudy. EuroIntervention. 2020;16(3):201–9.

Cortese B, Piraino D, Gentile D, et al. Intravascular imaging for left main stem assessment: an update on the most recent clinical data. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;100(7):1220–8.

Leesar MA, Hage FG. IVUS guidance on optimal stent deployment: new insights and perspectives. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;15(2):217–9.

Zhou J, Liew D, Duffy SJ, et al. Intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation: a health economic analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021;14(5):e006789.

Mueller C, Hodgson JM, Schindler C, et al. Cost-effectiveness of intracoronary ultrasound for percutaneous coronary interventions. Am J Cardiol. 2003;91(2):143–7.