Interpreting the style of faulting and paleoseismicity associated with the 1897 Shillong, northeast India, earthquake: Implications for regional tectonism

Tectonics - Tập 23 Số 4 - 2004
C. P. Rajendran1, Kusala Rajendran1, Bhagawat Pran Duarah2, Santanu Baruah3, A. Earnest1
1Centre for Earth Science Studies, Trivandrum, India
2Department of Geological Sciences, Gauhati University, Gauhati, India
3Regional Research Laboratory, Jorhat, India

Tóm tắt

The 1897 Shillong (Assam), northeast India, earthquake is considered to be one of the largest in the modern history. Although Oldham's [1899] classic memoir on this event opened new vistas in observational seismology, many questions on its style of faulting remain unresolved. Most previous studies considered this as a detachment earthquake that occurred on a gently north dipping fault, extending from the Himalayan front. A recent model proposed an alternate geometry governed by high‐angle faults to the north and south of the plateau, and it suggested that the 1897 earthquake occurred on a south dipping reverse fault, coinciding with the northern plateau margin. In this paper, we explore the available database, together with the coseismic observations from the region, to further understand the nature of faulting. The geophysical and geological data examined in this paper conform to a south dipping structure, but its location is inferred to be in the Brahmaputra basin, further north of the present plateau front. Our analyses of paleoseismic data suggest a 1200‐year interval between the 1897 event and its predecessor, and we identify the northern boundary fault as a major seismic source. The Shillong Plateau bounded by major faults behaves as an independent tectonic entity, with its own style of faulting, seismic productivity, and hazard potential, distinct from the Himalayan thrust front, a point that provides fresh insight into the regional geodynamics.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Aitken M. J., 1985, Luminescence Dating

Allen B. C., 1905, Assam District Gazetteers

10.1785/0120020093

Ambraseys N., 2003, A note on early earthquakes in northern India and southern Tibet, Curr. Sci., 86, 570

Banerji R. D.(1923) Annual report Archaeological Soc. of India pp.80–81 New Delhi.

Bapat A., 1983, Catalogue of Earthquakes in India and Neighbourhood From Historical Period up to 1979

Barua R. K. L., 1966, Early History of Kamarupa

10.1038/35071057

Chaudhury P. D., 1964, Archaeology in Assam

10.1029/JB095iB08p12527

Das P. K., 1996, Channel migration study of the Pagladiya River, Assam using remote sensing and field survey data, J. Geosci., 1, 38

Evans P., 1964, The tectonic framework of Assam, J. Geol. Soc. India, 5, 80

10.1016/0040-1951(92)90277-D

Gait E., 1905, A History of Assam

Gee E. R.(1934) The Dhubri earthquake of July 8 1930 Mem. Geol. Surv. Ind. 65 part 1 106 pp.

Geological Survey of India(1977) Contributions to geomorphology and geohydrology of the Brahmaputra Valley Misc. Publ. 32 Calcutta.

10.1029/WR021i007p00959

10.1029/TR037i005p00608

Hannay S. T., 1851, Brief notice of the Sil‐sako or stone bridge in Zillah Kamrup, J. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, 20, 291

Iyengar R. N., 1999, Earthquake history of India in medieval times, Indian J. Hist. Sci., 34, 181

10.1130/0016-7606(1991)103<1513:SATOTS>2.3.CO;2

10.1016/0040-1951(79)90227-0

10.1016/S0040-1951(01)00129-9

Keatings R. H., 1877, Record of the occurrences of earthquakes in Assam during the year 1874, 75, 76, J. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, 46, 294

Keatings R. H., 1878, Record of the occurrences of earthquakes in Assam during 1877, J. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, 47, 4

Molnar P., 1987, The distribution of intensity associated with the great 1897 Assam earthquake and constraints on the extent of rupture, J. Geol. Soc. India, 30, 13

10.1130/0016-7606(1959)70[319:QGOTBB]2.0.CO;2

Nandy D. R., 2001, Geodynamics of Northeastern India and Adjoining Region

Narula R. L. S. K.Acharyya andJ.Banerjee(Ed.) (2000) Seismotectonic atlas of India and its environs 43 pp. Geol. Surv. of Ind. Kolkata.

Obermeier S. F., 1998, Techniques in Paleoseismology, 331

Oldham R. D., 1898, General report—The earthquake of the 19th June 1897, Asiat. Misc., 2, 16

Oldham R. D.(1899) Report of the great earthquake of 12th June 1897 Mem. Geol. Surv. India 379 pp. (Reprinted by Geol. Surv. of India Calcutta 1981.).

Oldham R. D., 1926, The Cutch (Kachh) earthquake of 16th June 1819 with a revision of the great earthquake of 12th June 1897, Mem. Geol. Surv. India, 46, 118

Pinter N., 1996, Exercises in Active Tectonics

Poddar M. C., 1950, The Assam earthquake of 15th August 1950, Indian Miner., 4, 167

Rastogi B. K., 1993, Palaeoseismicity studies in Meghalaya, Curr. Sci., 64, 933

Richter C. F., 1958, Elementary Seismology

10.1029/ME004p0259

Srinivasan V., 2003, Deciphering differential uplift in Shillong Plateau using remote sensing, J. Geol. Soc. India, 612, 773

10.1017/S0033822200019123

10.1016/S0012-821X(99)00015-1

10.1016/S0040-1951(99)00082-7

Tuttle M., 1995, Recognizing and dating Prehistoric liquefaction features: Lessons learned in the New Madrid seismic zone, central United States, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 6171

Valdiya K. S., 1999, Why does river Brahmaputra remain untamed?, Curr. Sci., 76, 1301

10.1016/0040-1951(77)90171-8

Yeats R. S., 1998, Reassessment of earthquake hazard based on a fault‐bend fold model of the Himalayan plate‐boundary fault, Curr. Sci., 74, 230

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Tectonics

Tập 23 Số 4

Thông tin tác giả