Interpretation of canonical analysis: Rotated vs. unrotated solutions

Psychometrika - Tập 41 - Trang 35-42 - 1976
Norman Cliff1, David J. Krus2
1Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, University Park, Los Angeles
2Arizona State University, USA

Tóm tắt

Orthogonal rotation of canonical variates is shown to preserve the major properties of the canonical solution and may increase its interpretability.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Burt, C. Factor analysis and canonical correlation.British Journal of Psychology, 1948,1, 96–106. Hall, C. E. J. Rotation of canonical variates in multivariate analysis of variance.Experimental Education, 1969,38, 31–38. Hotelling, H. The most predictable criterion.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1935,26, 139–142. Hotelling, H. Relations between two sets of variates.Biometrika, 1936,28, 321–377. Horst, P. Relations amongm sets of variables.Psychometrika, 1961,26, 129–149. Kerlinger, F. N.Foundations of behavioral research. New York: Holt, 1973. Koons, P. B. Canonical analysis. In H. Borko (Ed.),Computer applications in the behavioral sciences. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1962. Krus, D. J. and Tellegen, A. Consciousness III: Fact or fiction?Psychological Reports, 1975,36, 23–30. Nie, N., Brent, D. H., and Hull, C. H.Statistical package for social sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970. Reich, C. A.The greening of America. New York: Random House, 1970. Tellegen, A. Research form of an authoritarian scale. Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota, 1974. Tellegen, A. and Atkinson, G. Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences (“absorption”), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility.Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 1974,33, 268–277. Tomkins, S. S.Polarity scale. New York: Springer, 1964.