Internet of Things

Emerald - Tập 22 Số 2 - Trang 357-367 - 2016
Veronica Scuotto, Alberto Ferraris, Stefano Bresciani

Tóm tắt

Purpose – An empirical testing on IBM smart cities projects was applied so as to demonstrate that the combination between the use of Internet of Things (IoT) and the implementation of the Open Innovation (OI) model within smart cities which has been changed the development of urban areas and effected firms’ innovativeness. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – A case study methodology on a leading multinational firms deeply involved in smart cities projects has been chosen. Findings – From this study it emerged how IBM: has a clear vision of smart cities and IoT; adopt a worldwide OI approach to smart cities; delineate-specific strategies and create OI units ad hoc for smart cities’ projects. Research limitations/implications – The major limitation of this work is that the analysis presented has been developed only on one case of multinational firm that operate in smart cities contexts. Practical implications – Recommendations will be made both to public and private actor in order to plan and implement efficient strategies to improve their performances. Originality/value – The concept of smart city has become quite popular between scholars and practitioners in the era of digital economy. Cities become smart developing new urban area using new Information and Communication Technologies such as mobile devices, the semantic web, cloud computing, and the IoT. Smart cities make innovation ecosystem, joining together different forces like knowledge-intensive activities, institutions for cooperation and learning, and web-based applications collective intelligence. This research is of importance and significance to scholars, government, and firms who need to understand the relevance of smart cities in the current economy.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Amara, N. and Landry, R. (2005), “Sources of information as determinants of novelty of innovation in manufacturing firms: evidence from the 1999 statistics Canada innovation survey”, Technovation , Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 245-259.

Ballon, P. , Pierson, J. and Delaere, S. (2005), “Test and experimentation platforms for broadband innovation: examining European practice”, paper presented at the 16th International Telecommunications Society Europe Conference, Porto, SSRN 1331557, September 4-6.

Baxter, P. and Jack, S. (2008), “Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchers”, The Qualitative Report , Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 544-559.

Bergvall-Kåreborn, B. , Ihlström Eriksson, C. , Ståhlbröst, A. and Svensson, J. (2009), “A milieu for innovation – defining Living Labs”, 2nd ISPIM Innovation Symposium, New York, NY, December, pp. 6-9.

Bresciani, S. and Ferraris, A. (2014), “The localization choice of multinational firms’ R & D centers: a survey in the piedmont area”, Journal of Promotion Management , Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 481-499.

Chebbi, H. , Yahiaoui, D. , Vrontis, D. and Thrassou, A. (2015), “Building multiunit ambidextrous organizations – a transformative framework”, Human Resource Management , Vol. 54 No. S1, pp. 155-177.

Chesbrough, H.W. (2003), Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

City of Edmonton (2006), available at: www.smartcity.edmonton.ab.ca/smart1.html (accessed May 11, 2015).

Cosgrave, E. , Arbuthnot, K. and Tryfonas, T. (2013), “Living Labs, innovation districts and information marketplaces: a systems approach for smart cities”, Procedia Computer Science , Vol. 16, pp. 668-677.

Del Giudice, M. and Straub, D. (2011), “IT and entrepreneurism: an on-again, off-again love affair or a marriage?”, MIS Quarterly , Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 3-11.

Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. (Eds) (1994), Handbook of Qualitative Research: Theories and Issues , Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Dodgson, M. , Gann, D. and Salter, A. (2006), “The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation: the case of procter & gamble”, R&D Management , Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 333-346.

El-Sawad, A. and Korczynski, M. (2007), “Management and music: the exceptional case of the IBM songbook”, Group & Organization Management , Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 79-108.

Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (2000), “The dynamics of innovation: from National systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations”, Research Policy , Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 109-123.

Feldman, M.P. (2000), “Location and innovation: the new economic georgraphy of innovation, spillovers and agglomeration”, in Clark, G.L. and Feldman, M.P. (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography , Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York, NY, pp. 373-395.

Ferraris, A. (2014), “Rethinking the literature on ‘multiple embeddedness’ and subsidiary-specific advantages”, Multinational Business Review , Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 15-33.

Fleischmann, M. , Van Nunen, J.A. and Gräve, B. (2003), “Integrating closed-loop supply chains and spare-parts management at IBM”, Interfaces , Vol. 33 No. 6, pp. 44-56.

Freeman, C. (1987), Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan , Frances Printer Publishers, London.

Gassmann, O. and Enkel, E. (2004), “Towards a theory of open innovation: three core process archetypes”, R&D Management Conference , Vol. 6, pp. 1-18.

Harvey, D. (2000), Spaces of Hope , Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.

Hernández-Muñoz, J.M. , Vercher, J.B. , Muñoz, L. , Galache, J.A. , Presser, M. , Gómez, L.A.H. and Pettersson, J. (2011), Smart Cities at the Forefront of the Future Internet , Springer, Berlin and Heidelberg, pp. 447-462.

IBM (2009), “IBM offers smarter city assessment tool to help cities prepare for challenges and opportunities of unprecedented urbanization”, available at: www.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressureless/27791.wss (accessed June 24, 2009).

IERC Cluster SRIA (2014), “Internet of Things: from research and innovation to market deployment”, available at: www.internet-of-things-research.eu/about_iot.htm (accessed June 11, 2015).

Jessop, B. (1997), “The entrepreneurial city: re-imagining localities, redesigning economic governance or restructuring capital”, in Jewson, N. and McGregor, S. (Eds), Transforming Cities , Routledge, London, pp. 28-41.

Johnson, W.H. (2008), “Roles, resources and benefits of intermediate organizations supporting triple helix collaborative R & D: the case of precarn”, Technovation , Vol. 28 No. 8, pp. 495-505.

Kaufmann, H.R. , Correia Loureiro, S.M. , Basile, G. and Vrontis, D. (2012), “The increasing dynamics between consumers, social groups and brands”, Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal , Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 404-419.

Knudsen, M.P. (2007), “The relative importance of interfirm relationships and knowledge transfer for new product development success”, The Journal of Product Innovation Management , Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 117-138.

Kourtit, K. and Nijkamp, P. (2012), “Smart cities in the innovation age”, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research , Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 93-95.

Li, J. , Chen, D. and Shapiro, D.M. (2010), “Product innovations in emerging economies: the role of foreign knowledge access channels and internal efforts in Chinese firms”, Management and Organization Review , Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 243-266.

Maggioni, V. and Giudice, D.M. (2008), “Scientific formulas and cognitive economics, beyond in vitro entrepreneurship”, Industry and Higher Education , Vol. 22 No. 6, pp. 365-372.

Pallot, M. , Trousse, B. , Senach, B. and Scapin, D. (2010), “Living lab research landscape: from user centred design and user experience towards user co-creation”, position paper, First Living Labs Summer School, Paris, available at: www-sop.inria.fr/llss2010/ (accessed June 8, 2015).

Paskaleva, K.A. (2011), “The smart city: a nexus for open innovation?”, Intelligent Buildings International , Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 153-171.

Peck, J. and Tickell, A. (2002), “Neo-liberalising space”, Antipode , Vol. 34 No. 3, pp. 380-404.

Porter, M.E. (1990), “The competitive advantage of notions”, Harvard Business Review , Vol. 68 No. 2, pp. 73-93.

Punch, W.F. (1998), “How effective are multiple populations in genetic programming”, Genetic Programming , Vol. 98, pp. 308-313.

Roy, J. (2001), “Rethinking communities: aligning technology & governance”, LAC Carling Government’s Review , 6-11 June.

Schaffers, H. , Komninos, N. , Pallot, M. , Trousse, B. , Nilsson, M. and Oliveira, A. (2011), Smart Cities and the Future Internet: Towards Cooperation Frameworks for Open Innovation , Springer, Berlin and Heidelberg, pp. 431-446.

Scuotto, V. and Morellato, M. (2013), “Entrepreneurial knowledge and digital competence: keys to success for student entrepreneurship”, Journal of the Knowledge Economy , Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 293-303.

Sekaran, S., U. and Bougie, R. (2013), Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach , 6th ed., John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York, NY.

Shearmur, R. (2012), “Are cities the font of innovation? A critical review of the literature on cities and innovation”, Cities , Vol. 29, pp. S9-S18.

Siemiatycki, M. (2002), “Smart cities, what’s next?”, paper presented at the Conference “Thinking Smart Cities”, Vol. 51, Carleton University, Ottawa, November.

Stake, R., E. (1995), The Art of Case Study Research , Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Thrassou, A. and Vrontis, D. (2008), “Internet marketing by SMEs: towards enhanced competitiveness and internationalisation of professional services”, International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising , Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 241-261.

Trequattrini, R. , Russo, G. and Lombardi, R. (2012), “Defining business network”, International Journal of Business Research and Management , Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 29-34.

Von Hippel, E. (2005a), “Democratizing innovation: the evolving phenomenon of user innovation”, Journal für Betriebswirtschaft , Vol. 55 No. 1, pp. 63-78.

Von Hippel, E.A. (2005b), Democratizing Innovation , MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Wang, D. and Scuotto, V. (2012), “Innovation, second mover and network system”, SYMPHONYA Emerging Issues in Management , Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 66-76.

Wiig, A. (2015), “IBM’s smart city as techno-utopian policy mobility”, City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action , Vol. 19 Nos 2-3, pp. 258-273.

Yin, R.K. (2013), Case Study Research: Design and Methods , Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.

Chandler, A.D. Jr (1990), Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism , Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.

Das, T.K. and Teng, B.S. (1998), “Between trust and control: developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances”, Academy of Management Review , Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 491-512.

Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989), “Building theories from case study research”, Academy of Management Review , Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 532-50.

Gottdiener, M. (2001), The Theming of America , Westview Press, Boulder, CO.

Graham, S. (2002), “Bridging urban digital divides: urban polarisation and information and communication technologies(s)”, Urban Studies , Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 33-56.

Hollands, R.G. (2008), “Will the real smart city please stand up?”, City , Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 303-320.

IBM (2013), “IBM intelligent operations center for smarter cities”, available at: www-03.ibm.com/software/products/en/intelligent-operations-center

Inkpen, A.C. and Beamish, P.W. (1997), “Knowledge, bargaining power, and the instability of international joint ventures”, Academy of Management Review , Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 177-202.

Klein, N. (2009), No Logo , Macmillan, London.

Maggioni, V. and Del Giudice, M. (2011), “Relazioni sistemiche tra imprenditorialità interna e gemmazione d’impresa: una ricerca empirica sulla natura cognitiva delle nuove imprese”, Sinergie rivista di studi e ricerche , Vol. 71, pp. 171-197.

Monbiot, G. (2000), The Captive State , Macmillan, London.

Naphade, M. , Banavar, G. , Harrison, C. , Paraszczak, J. and Morris, R. (2011), “Smarter cities and their innovation challenges”, Computer , Vol. 44 No. 6, pp. 32-39.