International relations: plural or postcolonial?

Sanjay Seth1
1Politics and International Relations, Goldsmiths College, University of London, London, UK

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Anghie, A. (2005). Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law. Cambridge University Press.

Armitage, D. (2012). Foundations of modern international thought. Cambridge University Press.

Ashley, R. K. (1988). Untying the Sovereign State: A double reading of the anarchy problematique. Millennium, 17(2), 227–262.

Chatterjee, P. (1993). The nation and its fragments: Colonial and postcolonial histories. Princeton University Press.

Geertz, C. (2000) ‘The World in Pieces: Culture and Politics at the End of the Century’. In Available light: Anthropological reflections on philosophical topics (pp. 218–263). Princeton University Press.

Grovogui, S. (1996). Sovereigns, Quasi Sovereigns, and Africans: Race and Self-Determination in International Law. Minnesota Archive (Editions). University of Minnesota Press.

Kayaoğlu, T. (2010). Legal Imperialism: Sovereignty and Extraterritoriality in Japan, the Ottoman Empire, and China. Cambridge University Press.

Mamdani, M. (1996). Citizen and subject: Contemporary Africa and the Legacy of Late Colonialism. Princeton University Press.

Mazower, M. (2009). No Enchanted Palace: The End of Empire and the Ideological Origins of the United Nations. Princeton University Press.

Seth, S. (2013). Introduction. In S. Seth (Ed.), Postcolonial theory and international relations: A critical introduction (pp. 1–12). Routledge.

Seth, S. (2020). Beyond reason: Postcolonial theory and the social sciences. Oxford University Press.

Stern, P. J. (2011). The Company-State: Corporate Sovereignty and the Early Modern Foundations of the British Empire in India, The Company-State. Oxford University Press.