International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 5: surgical margins

Watson, 1996, Positive surgical margins with radical prostatectomy: detailed pathological analysis and prognosis, Urology, 48, 80, 10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00092-1 Cheng, 1999, Correlation of margin status and extraprostatic extension with progression of prostate carcinoma, Cancer, 86, 1775, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19991101)86:9<1775::AID-CNCR20>3.0.CO;2-L Epstein, 2005, Prognostic factors and reporting of prostate carcinoma in radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy specimens, Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl, 216, 34, 10.1080/03008880510030932 Pettus, 2004, Biochemical failure in men following radical retropubic prostatectomy: impact of surgical margin status and location, J Urol, 172, 129, 10.1097/01.ju.0000132160.68779.96 Saether, 2008, Are positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens an independent prognostic marker?, Scand J Urol Nephrol, 42, 514, 10.1080/00365590802299585 Weldon, 1995, Patterns of positive specimen margins and detectable prostate specific antigen after radical perineal prostatectomy, J Urol, 153, 1565, 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)67462-7 Wieder, 1998, Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer, J Urol, 160, 299, 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62881-7 Montironi, 2009, Pathological definition and difficulties in assessing positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens, BJU Int, 103, 286, 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08006.x Epstein, 1996, Prediction of progression following radical prostatectomy. A multivariate analysis of 721 men with long-term follow-up, Am J Surg Pathol, 20, 286, 10.1097/00000478-199603000-00004 Ohori, 1995, Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens, J Urol, 154, 1818, 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66792-2 Cheng, 2000, Preoperative prediction of surgical margin status in patients with prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy, J Clin Oncol, 18, 2862, 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.15.2862 Egevad L, Srigley JR, Delahunt B . International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens: rationale and organization. Mod Pathol 2010 (in press). Samaratunga H, Montironi R, True L, et al. International Society of Urological Pathologists (ISUP) consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens. Working group 1: specimen handling. Mod Pathol 2010 (in press). van der Kwast T, Amin MB, Billis A, et al. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens. Working group 2: T2 substaging and prostate cancer volume. Mod Pathol 2010 (in press). Magi-Galluzzi C, Evans A, Delahunt B, et al. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens. Working group 3: extraprostatic extension, lymphovascular invasion and locally advanced disease. Mod Pathol 2010 (in press). Berney D, Wheeler T, Grignon D, et al. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens. Working group 4: seminal vesicles and lymph nodes. Mod Pathol 2010 (in press). Srigley, 2009, Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with carcinoma of the prostate gland, Arch Pathol Lab Med, 133, 1568, 10.5858/133.10.1568 Kench J, Clouston D, Delahunt B, et al. Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Prostate Cancer (Radical Prostatectomy) Structured Reporting Protocol. 2010, 54 pp. http://www.rcpa.edu.au/Publications/StructuredReporting/CancerProtocols.htm. Epstein, 1990, Evaluation of radical prostatectomy capsular margins of resection. The significance of margins designated as negative, closely approaching, and positive, Am J Surg Pathol, 14, 626, 10.1097/00000478-199007000-00003 Emerson, 2005, Closest distance between tumor and resection margin in radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prognostic significance, Am J Surg Pathol, 29, 225, 10.1097/01.pas.0000146008.47191.76 Epstein, 1997, Do close but negative margins in radical prostatectomy specimens increase the risk of postoperative progression?, J Urol, 157, 241, 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65336-9 Salomon, 2003, Location of positive surgical margins after retropubic, perineal, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer, Urology, 61, 386, 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)02255-0 Smith, 2007, A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy, J Urol, 178, 2385, 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.008 Obek, 1999, Positive surgical margins with radical retropubic prostatectomy: anatomic site-specific pathologic analysis and impact on prognosis, Urology, 54, 682, 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00204-6 Eastham, 2007, Prognostic significance of location of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens, Urology, 70, 965, 10.1016/j.urology.2007.08.040 Sofer, 2002, Positive surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy: the influence of site and number on progression, J Urol, 167, 2453, 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65003-3 Poulos, 2004, Bladder neck invasion is an independent predictor of prostate-specific antigen recurrence, Cancer, 101, 1563, 10.1002/cncr.20551 Aydin, 2004, Positive proximal (bladder neck) margin at radical prostatectomy confers greater risk of biochemical progression, Urology, 64, 551, 10.1016/j.urology.2004.04.003 Zhou, 2009, Microscopic bladder neck involvement by prostate carcinoma in radical prostatectomy specimens is not a significant independent prognostic factor, Mod Pathol, 22, 385, 10.1038/modpathol.2008.190 Buschemeyer, 2008, Is a positive bladder neck margin truly a T4 lesion in the prostate specific antigen era? Results from the SEARCH Database, J Urol, 179, 124, 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.130 Babaian, 2001, Analysis of clinicopathologic factors predicting outcome after radical prostatectomy, Cancer, 91, 1414, 10.1002/1097-0142(20010415)91:8<1414::AID-CNCR1147>3.0.CO;2-G Chuang, 2007, The significance of positive surgical margin in areas of capsular incision in otherwise organ confined disease at radical prostatectomy, J Urol, 178, 1306, 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.159 Marks, 2007, The relationship between the extent of surgical margin positivity and prostate specific antigen recurrence in radical prostatectomy specimens, Hum Pathol, 38, 1207, 10.1016/j.humpath.2007.01.006 Shuford, 2004, Adverse prognostic significance of capsular incision with radical retropubic prostatectomy, J Urol, 172, 119, 10.1097/01.ju.0000132137.02846.ec Chuang, 2008, Positive surgical margins in areas of capsular incision in otherwise organ-confined disease at radical prostatectomy: histologic features and pitfalls, Am J Surg Pathol, 32, 1201, 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318162a8bf Kernek, 2005, The presence of benign prostatic glandular tissue at surgical margins does not predict PSA recurrence, J Clin Pathol, 58, 725, 10.1136/jcp.2004.024182