Nội dung được dịch bởi AI, chỉ mang tính chất tham khảo
Niềm tin kiểm soát nội tại và khung tham chiếu đồng thời tác động đến các ERPs giám sát hiệu suất sớm
Tóm tắt
Nghiên cứu này đã điều tra tác động của các khung tham chiếu dựa trên tiêu chí so với khung tham chiếu xã hội đến các tương quan hành vi và thần kinh của việc giám sát hiệu suất trong khi xem xét sự khác biệt cá nhân về niềm tin kiểm soát. Chúng tôi đã tiến hành hai thí nghiệm thực hiện một nhiệm vụ ước lượng thời gian, trong đó phản hồi được cung cấp liên quan đến hiệu suất của người tham gia (khung tham chiếu không xã hội/dựa trên tiêu chí) hoặc đến hiệu suất của một nhóm tham chiếu gồm những người tham gia trước đó (khung tham chiếu xã hội). Trong Thí nghiệm 1, 34 tình nguyện viên nam tham gia. Để kiểm tra khả năng tổng quát của các kết quả quan sát được đối với cả hai giới tính, chúng tôi đã tuyển 36 tình nguyện viên nữ cho Thí nghiệm 2. Biên độ P2 và P300 thường lớn hơn trong các thí nghiệm khung tham chiếu xã hội so với khung tham chiếu không xã hội ở các tình nguyện viên nam trong Thí nghiệm 1. Biên độ ΔFRN lớn hơn cho các thí nghiệm khung tham chiếu xã hội so với khung tham chiếu không xã hội trong Thí nghiệm 1. Không tìm thấy tác động nào của khung tham chiếu trong mẫu nữ trong Thí nghiệm 2. Thay vào đó, các hiệu ứng P2 và ΔFRN cho thấy các mô hình đối kháng cho khung tham chiếu không xã hội so với xã hội. Tuy nhiên, niềm tin kiểm soát nội tại mạnh mẽ hơn đi kèm với các biên độ FRN lớn hơn của các thí nghiệm tham chiếu xã hội tiêu cực trong cả hai mẫu, gợi ý rằng các hiệu ứng này có thể tổng quát độc lập với giới tính. Các biên độ P2 và ΔFRN được tăng cường cho các thí nghiệm khung tham chiếu xã hội so với không xã hội gợi ý sự thu hút chú ý tăng lên và độ nổi bật cao hơn của phản hồi được định khung xã hội, chỉ trong các tình nguyện viên nam. Tuy nhiên, trong cả hai giới tính, khung tham chiếu xã hội có thể thách thức niềm tin kiểm soát nội tại và do đó cải thiện việc giám sát hiệu suất. Kết quả của chúng tôi cho thấy sự tương tác phức tạp của các biến tính cách và các khung tham chiếu trong quá trình giám sát hiệu suất ảnh hưởng đến cuộc sống hàng ngày của chúng ta - các khung tham chiếu có mặt khắp nơi trong giáo dục và môi trường làm việc của mỗi người.
Từ khóa
#niềm tin kiểm soát nội tại #khung tham chiếu #giám sát hiệu suất #ERPs #phản hồi xã hội #khác biệt giới tínhTài liệu tham khảo
Aarts, K., & Pourtois, G. (2012). Anxiety disrupts the evaluative component of performance monitoring: An ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 50(7), 1286-1296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.02.012
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Alexander, W. H., & Brown, J. W. (2011). Medial prefrontal cortex as an action-outcome predictor. Nature Neuroscience, 14(10), 1338-1344.
Becker, M. P., Nitsch, A. M., Miltner, W. H., & Straube, T. (2014). A single-trial estimation of the feedback-related negativity and its relation to BOLD responses in a time-estimation task. J Neurosci, 34(8), 3005-3012. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.3684-13.2014
Bell, A. J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1995). An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural computation, 7(6), 1129-1159.
Bellebaum, C., & Daum, I. (2008). Learning-related changes in reward expectancy are reflected in the feedback-related negativity. European Journal of Neuroscience, 27(7), 1823-1835.
Beyer, F., Sidarus, N., Bonicalzi, S., & Haggard, P. (2016). Beyond self-serving bias: diffusion of responsibility reduces sense of agency and outcome monitoring. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw160
Buunk, B. P., Zurriaga, R., Peíró, J. M., Nauta, A., & Gosalvez, I. (2005). Social Comparisons at Work as Related to a Cooperative Social Climate and to Individual Differences in Social Comparison Orientation. Applied Psychology, 54(1), 61-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00196.x
Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 55, 591-621.
Clayson, P. E., Clawson, A., & Larson, M. J. (2011). Sex differences in electrophysiological indices of conflict monitoring. Biol Psychol, 87(2), 282-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.03.011
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
Coricelli, G., Critchley, H. D., Joffily, M., O'Doherty, J. P., Sirigu, A., & Dolan, R. J. (2005). Regret and its avoidance: A neuroimaging study of choice behavior. Nat Neurosci, 8(9), 1255-1262. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1514
Cuthbert, B. N., Schupp, H. T., Bradley, M. M., Birbaumer, N., & Lang, P. J. (2000). Brain potentials in affective picture processing: Covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report. Biological Psychology, 52(2), 95-111.
Darley, J. M., & Latane, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(4 PART 1), 377-383. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025589
Debener, S., Ullsperger, M., Siegel, M., Fiehler, K., Von Cramon, D. Y., & Engel, A. K. (2005). Trial-by-trial coupling of concurrent electroencephalogram and functional magnetic resonance imaging identifies the dynamics of performance monitoring. Journal of Neuroscience, 25(50), 11730-11737.
Dekkers, L. M., van der Molen, M. J., Gunther Moor, B., van der Veen, F. M., & van der Molen, M. W. (2015). Cardiac and electro-cortical concomitants of social feedback processing in women. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, 10(11), 1506-1514. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsv039
Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134(1), 9-21.
Derogatis, L. R., & Melisaratos, N. (1983). The Brief Symptom Inventory: an introductory report. Psychol Med, 13(3), 595-605.
Dunbar, R. I. M. (2011). Evolutionary basis of the social brain. Oxford Handbook of Social Neuroscience, 28-38.
Duncan Johnson, C. C., & Donchin, E. (1977). On quantifying surprise. The variation of event related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology, 14(5), 456-467.
Edwards, L. J., Muller, K. E., Wolfinger, R. D., Qaqish, B. F., & Schabenberger, O. (2008). An R2 statistic for fixed effects in the linear mixed model. Statistics in Medicine, 27(29), 6137-6157. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3429
Eliot, L. (2011). The trouble with sex differences. Neuron, 72(6), 895-898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.12.001
Ernst, B., & Steinhauser, M. (2015). Effects of invalid feedback on learning and feedback-related brain activity in decision-making. Brain Cogn, 99, 78-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2015.07.006
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149-1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.41.4.1149
Fischer, A. G., Danielmeier, C., Villringer, A., Klein, T. A., & Ullsperger, M. (2016). Gender influences on brain responses to errors and post-error adjustments. Sci Rep, 6, 24435. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep24435
Forsyth, D. R., Zyzniewski, L. E., & Giammanco, C. A. (2002). Responsibility diffusion in cooperative collectives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(1), 54-65.
Gibbons, F. X., & Buunk, B. P. (1999). Individual differences in social comparison: Development of a scale of social comparison orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(1), 129-142. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.129
Gibbons, H., Schnuerch, R., & Stahl, J. (2016). From Positivity to Negativity Bias: Ambiguity Affects the Neurophysiological Signatures of Feedback Processing. J Cogn Neurosci, 28(4), 542-557. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00921
Gong, X., & Sanfey, A. G. (2017). Social rank and social cooperation: Impact of social comparison processes on cooperative decision-making. PLoS ONE, 12(4), e0175472. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175472
Gu, R., Lei, Z., Broster, L., Wu, T., Jiang, Y., & Luo, Y. J. (2011). Beyond valence and magnitude: a flexible evaluative coding system in the brain. Neuropsychologia, 49(14), 3891-3897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.10.006
Hajcak, G., Moser, J. S., Holroyd, C. B., & Simons, R. F. (2006). The feedback-related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes. Biological Psychology, 71(2), 148-154.
Hajcak, G., Moser, J. S., Holroyd, C. B., & Simons, R. F. (2007). It's worse than you thought: The feedback negativity and violations of reward prediction in gambling tasks. Psychophysiology, 44(6), 905-912.
Hancock, P. A., & Rausch, R. (2010). The effects of sex, age, and interval duration on the perception of time. Acta Psychologica, 133(2), 170-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.11.005
Hayden, B. Y., Heilbronner, S. R., Pearson, J. M., & Platt, M. L. (2011). Surprise signals in anterior cingulate cortex: neuronal encoding of unsigned reward prediction errors driving adjustment in behavior. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(11), 4178-4187. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.4652-10.2011
Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. Wiley: New York.
Hewig, J., Trippe, R. H., Hecht, H., Coles, M. G., Holroyd, C. B., & Miltner, W. H. (2008). An electrophysiological analysis of coaching in Blackjack. Cortex, 44(9), 1197-1205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2007.07.006
Hirsh, J. B., & Inzlicht, M. (2008). The devil you know: Neuroticism predicts neural response to uncertainty. Psychological Science, 19(10), 962-967.
Holroyd, C. B., & Coles, M. G. H. (2002). The neural basis of human error processing: Reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 109(4), 679-709.
Holroyd, C. B., Nieuwenhuis, S., Yeung, N., & Cohen, J. D. (2003). Errors in reward prediction are reflected in the event-related brain potential. NeuroReport, 14(18), 2481-2484.
Keselman, H. J., Wilcox, R. R., & Lix, L. M. (2003). A generally robust approach to hypothesis testing in independent and correlated groups designs. Psychophysiology, 40(4), 586-596.
Kim, B. R., Liss, A., Rao, M., Singer, Z., & Compton, R. J. (2012). Social deviance activates the brain's error-monitoring system. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci, 12(1), 65-73. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-011-0067-5
Kim, S.-i., Lee, M.-J., Chung, Y., & Bong, M. (2010). Comparison of brain activation during norm-referenced versus criterion-referenced feedback: The role of perceived competence and performance-approach goals. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(2), 141-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.04.002
Kirk, R. E. (1996). Practical Significance: A Concept Whose Time Has Come. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(5), 746-759. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164496056005002
Koban, L., & Pourtois, G. (2014). Brain systems underlying the affective and social monitoring of actions: An integrative review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 46P1, 71-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.02.014
Kogler, L., Sailer, U., Derntl, B., & Pfabigan, D. M. (2017). Processing expected and unexpected uncertainty is modulated by fearless-dominance personality traits - An exploratory ERP study on feedback processing. Physiol Behav, 168, 74-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.10.016
Krampen, G. (1991). Fragebogen zu Kompetenz- und Kontrollüberzeugungen (FKK). Hogrefe: Göttingen.
Kujawa, A., Arfer, K. B., Klein, D. N., & Proudfit, G. H. (2014). Electrocortical reactivity to social feedback in youth: a pilot study of the Island Getaway task. Dev Cogn Neurosci, 10, 140-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2014.08.008
Lamm, C., & Singer, T. (2010). The role of anterior insular cortex in social emotions. Brain Struct Funct, 214(5-6), 579-591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-010-0251-3
Larson, M. J., South, M., & Clayson, P. E. (2011). Sex differences in error-related performance monitoring. Neuroreport, 22(1), 44-48. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283427403
Lederman, L. M., & Burnstein, R. A. (2006). Alternative Approaches to High-Stakes Testing. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(6), 429-432. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170608700606
Levenson, H. (1981). Differentiating among internality, powerful others, and chance. Research with the Locus of Control Construct, 1, 15-63.
Li, P., Jia, S., Feng, T., Liu, Q., Suo, T., & Li, H. (2010). The influence of the diffusion of responsibility effect on outcome evaluations: Electrophysiological evidence from an ERP study. Neuroimage, 52(4), 1727-1733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.275
Lieberman, M. D. (2007). Social cognitive neuroscience: a review of core processes. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 58, 259-289.
Lieberman, M. D., Gaunt, R., Gilbert, D. T., & Trope, Y. (2002). Reflexion and reflection: A social cognitive neuroscience approach to attributional inference Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 34 (pp. 199-249). San Diego, CA, US: Academic Press.
Lindner, M., Rudorf, S., Birg, R., Falk, A., Weber, B., & Fliessbach, K. (2015). Neural patterns underlying social comparisons of personal performance. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, 10(4), 569-576. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsu087
Luck, S. J., & Gaspelin, N. (2017). How to get statistically significant effects in any ERP experiment (and why you shouldn't). Psychophysiology, 54(1), 146-157. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12639
Luo, Y., Feng, C., Wu, T., Broster, L. S., Cai, H., Gu, R., & Luo, Y. J. (2015). Social Comparison Manifests in Event-related Potentials. Sci Rep, 5, 12127. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12127
Miller, G. A., & Chapman, J. P. (2001). Misunderstanding analysis of covariance. J Abnorm Psychol, 110(1), 40-48.
Miltner, W. H. R., Braun, C. H., & Coles, M. G. H. (1997). Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: Evidence for a 'generic' neural system for error detection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9(6), 788-798.
Nelson, B. D., Kessel, E. M., Jackson, F., & Hajcak, G. (2016). The impact of an unpredictable context and intolerance of uncertainty on the electrocortical response to monetary gains and losses. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci, 16(1), 153-163. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-015-0382-3
Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2011). Gender and Competition. Annual Review of Economics, 3(1), 601-630. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-111809-125122
Nieuwenhuis, S., Aston-Jones, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2005). Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system. Psychol Bull, 131(4), 510-532. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.4.510
Nieuwenhuis, S., Yeung, N., Holroyd, C. B., Schurger, A., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). Sensitivity of electrophysiological activity from medial frontal cortex to utilitarian and performance feedback. Cerebral Cortex, 14(7), 741-747. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhh034
Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97-113.
Pfabigan, D. M., Alexopoulos, J., Bauer, H., & Sailer, U. (2011). Manipulation of feedback expectancy and valence induces negative and positive reward prediction error signals manifest in event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 48(5), 656-664.
Pfabigan, D. M., Zeiler, M., Lamm, C., & Sailer, U. (2014). Blocked versus randomized presentation modes differentially modulate feedback-related negativity and P3b amplitudes. Clinical Neurophysiology, 125(4), 715-726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2013.09.029
Pfabigan, D. M., Sailer, U., & Lamm, C. (2015a). Size does matter! Perceptual stimulus properties affect event-related potentials during feedback processing. Psychophysiology, 52(9), 1238-1247. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12458
Pfabigan, D. M., Seidel, E. M., Paul, K., Grahl, A., Sailer, U., Lanzenberger, R., Lamm, C. (2015b). Context-sensitivity of the feedback-related negativity for zero-value feedback outcomes. Biol Psychol, 104, 184-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.12.007
Pfabigan, D. M., Gittenberger, M., & Lamm, C. (2017) Social dimension and complexity differentially influence brain responses during feedback processing. Social Neuroscience, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2017.1395765.
Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118(10), 2128-2148.
Potts, G. F. (2004). An ERP index of task relevance evaluation of visual stimuli. Brain Cogn, 56(1), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2004.03.006
Potts, G. F., Martin, L. E., Burton, P., & Montague, P. R. (2006). When things are better or worse than expected: The medial frontal cortex and the allocation of processing resources. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(7), 1112-1119.
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological monographs, 80(1), 1-28.
Santesso, D. L., Dzyundzyak, A., & Segalowitz, S. J. (2011). Age, sex and individual differences in punishment sensitivity: Factors influencing the feedback-related negativity. Psychophysiology, 48(11), 1481-1489. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq090
Seidel, E.-M., Eickhoff, S. B., Kellermann, T., Schneider, F., Gur, R. C., Habel, U., & Derntl, B. (2010). Who is to blame? Neural correlates of causal attribution in social situations. Social neuroscience, 5(4), 335-350.
Shestakova, A., Rieskamp, J., Tugin, S., Ossadtchi, A., Krutitskaya, J., & Klucharev, V. (2013). Electrophysiological precursors of social conformity. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, 8(7), 756-763. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss064
Somerville, L. H., Heatherton, T. F., & Kelley, W. M. (2006). Anterior cingulate cortex responds differentially to expectancy violation and social rejection. Nat Neurosci, 9(8), 1007-1008. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1728
Steiger, J. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87(2), 245-251. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.87.2.245
Sun, S., & Yu, R. (2014). The feedback related negativity encodes both social rejection and explicit social expectancy violation. Front Hum Neurosci, 8, 556. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00556
Talmi, D., Atkinson, R., & El-Deredy, W. (2013). The feedback-related negativity signals salience prediction errors, not reward prediction errors. J Neurosci, 33(19), 8264-8269. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.5695-12.2013
van der Molen, M. J., Poppelaars, E. S., Van Hartingsveldt, C. T., Harrewijn, A., Gunther Moor, B., & Westenberg, P. M. (2013). Fear of negative evaluation modulates electrocortical and behavioral responses when anticipating social evaluative feedback. Front Hum Neurosci, 7, 936. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00936
van der Molen, M. J., Dekkers, L. M., Westenberg, P. M., van der Veen, F. M., & van der Molen, M. W. (2016). Why don't you like me? Midfrontal theta power in response to unexpected peer rejection feedback. Neuroimage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.045
van der Veen, F. M., van der Molen, M. J., van der Molen, M. W., & Franken, I. H. (2016). Thumbs up or thumbs down? Effects of neuroticism and depressive symptoms on psychophysiological responses to social evaluation in healthy students. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci, 16(5), 836-847. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-016-0435-2
Walton, M. E., Devlin, J. T., & Rushworth, M. F. S. (2004). Interactions between decision making and performance monitoring within prefrontal cortex. Nat Neurosci, 7(11), 1259-1265. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1339
Weiner, B. (1985). An Attributional Theory of Achievement Motivation and Emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548-573. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.92.4.548
Wilcox, R. R. (2010). Fundamentals of modern statistical methods: Substantially improving power and accuracy. Springer: New York.
Wilcox, R. R. (2012). Modern statistics for the social and behavioral sciences: A practical introduction. Chapman & Hall/CRC.
Wu, Y., Zhang, D., Elieson, B., & Zhou, X. (2012). Brain potentials in outcome evaluation: when social comparison takes effect. Int J Psychophysiol, 85(2), 145-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.06.004
Yi, F., Chen, H., Wang, X., Shi, H., Yi, J., Zhu, X., & Yao, S. (2012). Amplitude and latency of feedback-related negativity: aging and sex differences. Neuroreport, 23(16), 963-969. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e328359d1c4
Zingoni, M., & Byron, K. (2017). How beliefs about the self influence perceptions of negative feedback and subsequent effort and learning. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 139, 50-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.01.007