Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer: Stratification and Management

European urology oncology - Tập 3 - Trang 270-280 - 2020
Felix Preisser1, Matthew R. Cooperberg2, Juanita Crook3, Felix Feng4, Markus Graefen5, Pierre I. Karakiewicz6, Laurence Klotz7, Rodolfo Montironi8, Paul L. Nguyen9, Anthony V. D’Amico9
1Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
2Department of Urology, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
3BCCA Center for the Southern Interior, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada
4Department of Radiation Oncology, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
5Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
6Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
7Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
8Section of Pathological Anatomy, Marche Polytechnic University, School of Medicine, United Hospitals, Ancona, Italy
9Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

D’Amico, 1998, Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer, JAMA, 280, 969, 10.1001/jama.280.11.969 Mottet, 2019 Mohler, 2019, Prostate cancer, version 2.2019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology, J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 17, 479, 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0023 Sanda Martin, 2018, Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO guideline. Part I: risk stratification, shared decision making, and care options, J Urol, 199, 683, 10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.095 Zumsteg, 2013, A new risk classification system for therapeutic decision making with intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients undergoing dose-escalated external-beam radiation therapy, Eur Urol, 64, 895, 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.033 Keane, 2015, Androgen deprivation therapy and the risk of death from prostate cancer among men with favorable or unfavorable intermediate-risk disease, Cancer, 121, 2713, 10.1002/cncr.29420 Zumsteg, 2017, Number of unfavorable intermediate-risk factors predicts pathologic upstaging and prostate cancer-specific mortality following radical prostatectomy: results from the SEARCH database, Prostate, 77, 154, 10.1002/pros.23255 Draulans, 2019, Impact of magnetic resonance imaging on prostate cancer staging and European Association of Urology risk classification, Urology, 130, 113, 10.1016/j.urology.2019.04.023 Bass, 2019, Targeted biopsy of the prostate: does this result in improvement in detection of high-grade cancer or the occurrence of the Will Rogers phenomenon?, BJU Int, 124, 643, 10.1111/bju.14806 Hamdy, 2016, 10-Year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer, N Engl J Med, 375, 1415, 10.1056/NEJMoa1606220 Wilt, 2017, Follow-up of prostatectomy versus observation for early prostate cancer, N Engl J Med, 377, 132, 10.1056/NEJMoa1615869 Bill-Axelson, 2018, Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in prostate cancer—29-year follow-up, N Engl J Med, 379, 2319, 10.1056/NEJMoa1807801 Klotz, 2015, Long-term follow-up of a large active surveillance cohort of patients with prostate cancer, J Clin Oncol, 33, 272, 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.1192 Masic, 2018, Effects of initial Gleason grade on outcomes during active surveillance for prostate cancer, Eur Urol Oncol, 1, 386, 10.1016/j.euo.2018.04.018 Kornberg, 2019, Genomic prostate score, PI-RADSTM version 2 and progression in men with prostate cancer on active surveillance, J Urol, 201, 300, 10.1016/j.juro.2018.08.047 Falagario, 2019, Defining prostate cancer at favorable intermediate risk: the potential utility of magnetic resonance imaging and genomic tests, J Urol, 202, 102, 10.1097/JU.0000000000000134 Herlemann, 2020, Decipher identifies men with otherwise clinically favorable-intermediate risk disease who may not be good candidates for active surveillance, Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 23, 136, 10.1038/s41391-019-0167-9 Noguchi, 2003, Prognostic factors for multifocal prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of significance of secondary cancers, J Urol, 170, 459, 10.1097/01.ju.0000070928.49986.04 Blazevski A., Scheltema M.J., Yuen B., et al. Oncological and quality-of-life outcomes following focal irreversible electroporation as primary treatment for localised prostate cancer: a biopsy-monitored prospective cohort. Eur Urol Oncol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2019.04.008. Shah, 2019, Early-medium-term outcomes of primary focal cryotherapy to treat nonmetastatic clinically significant prostate cancer from a prospective multicentre registry, Eur Urol, 76, 98, 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.12.030 Rischmann, 2017, Focal high intensity focused ultrasound of unilateral localized prostate cancer: a prospective multicentric hemiablation study of 111 patients, Eur Urol, 71, 267, 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.09.039 Feijoo, 2016, Focal high-intensity focused ultrasound targeted hemiablation for unilateral prostate cancer: a prospective evaluation of oncologic and functional outcomes, Eur Urol, 69, 214, 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.018 Ganzer, 2018, Prospective multicenter phase II study on focal therapy (hemiablation) of the prostate with high intensity focused ultrasound, J Urol, 199, 983, 10.1016/j.juro.2017.10.033 Guillaumier, 2018, A multicentre study of 5-year outcomes following focal therapy in treating clinically significant nonmetastatic prostate cancer, Eur Urol, 74, 422, 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.06.006 Albisinni, 2017, Comparing high-intensity focal ultrasound hemiablation to robotic radical prostatectomy in the management of unilateral prostate cancer: a matched-pair analysis, J Endourol, 31, 14, 10.1089/end.2016.0702 Kurbegovic, 2017, The risk of biochemical recurrence for intermediate-risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy, Scand J Urol, 51, 450, 10.1080/21681805.2017.1356369 Beauval, 2017, Improved decision making in intermediate-risk prostate cancer: a multicenter study on pathologic and oncologic outcomes after radical prostatectomy, World J Urol, 35, 1191, 10.1007/s00345-016-1979-z Wallis, 2016, Surgery versus radiotherapy for clinically-localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Eur Urol, 70, 21, 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.11.010 Soni, 2019, Comparison of population-based observational studies with randomized trials in oncology, J Clin Oncol, 37, 1209, 10.1200/JCO.18.01074 Roach, 2015, Radical prostatectomy versus radiation and androgen deprivation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: how good is the evidence?, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 93, 1064, 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.08.005 Robinson, 2018, Prostate cancer death after radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy: a nationwide population-based observational study, Eur Urol, 73, 502, 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.11.039 Giberti, 2017, Robotic prostatectomy versus brachytherapy for the treatment of low risk prostate cancer, Can J Urol, 24, 8728 Frank, 2018, Prospective phase 2 trial of permanent seed implantation prostate brachytherapy for intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer: efficacy, toxicity, and quality of life outcomes, Int J Radiat Oncol, 100, 374, 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.09.050 Prestidge, 2016, Initial report of NRG oncology/RTOG 0232: a phase 3 study comparing combined external beam radiation and transperineal interstitial permanent brachytherapy with brachytherapy alone for selected patients with intermediate-risk prostatic carcinoma, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 96, S4, 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.06.026 Morris, 2017, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 98, 275, 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.11.026 D’Amico, 2004, 6-Month androgen suppression plus radiation therapy vs radiation therapy alone for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer: a randomized controlled trial, JAMA, 292, 821, 10.1001/jama.292.7.821 D’Amico, 2008, Androgen suppression and radiation vs radiation alone for prostate cancer: a randomized trial, JAMA, 299, 289, 10.1001/jama.299.3.289 Jones, 2011, Radiotherapy and short-term androgen deprivation for localized prostate cancer, N Engl J Med, 365, 107, 10.1056/NEJMoa1012348 Denham, 2011, Short-term neoadjuvant androgen deprivation and radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: 10-year data from the TROG 96.01 randomised trial, Lancet Oncol, 12, 451, 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70063-8 Zapatero, 2015, High-dose radiotherapy with short-term or long-term androgen deprivation in localised prostate cancer (DART01/05 GICOR): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial, Lancet Oncol, 16, 320, 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70045-8 Bolla, 2016, Short androgen suppression and radiation dose escalation for intermediate- and high-risk localized prostate cancer: results of EORTC trial 22991, J Clin Oncol, 34, 1748, 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.8055 Keane, 2014, The likelihood of death from prostate cancer in men with favorable or unfavorable intermediate-risk disease, Cancer, 120, 1787, 10.1002/cncr.28609 Dubray, 2016, Does short-term androgen depletion add to high dose radiotherapy (80 Gy) in localized intermediate risk prostate cancer? Final analysis of GETUG 14 randomized trial (EU-20503/NCT00104741), J Clin Oncol, 34, 5021, 10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.5021 Kuban, 2008, Long-term results of the M. D. Anderson randomized dose-escalation trial for prostate cancer, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 70, 67, 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.06.054 Beckendorf, 2011, 70 Gy versus 80 Gy in localized prostate cancer: 5-year results of GETUG 06 randomized trial, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 80, 1056, 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.03.049 Creak, 2013, Randomised pilot study of dose escalation using conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: long-term follow-up, Br J Cancer, 109, 651, 10.1038/bjc.2013.394 Dearnaley, 2014, Escalated-dose versus control-dose conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: long-term results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial, Lancet Oncol, 15, 464, 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70040-3 Heemsbergen, 2014, Long-term results of the Dutch randomized prostate cancer trial: impact of dose-escalation on local, biochemical, clinical failure, and survival, Radiother Oncol, 110, 104, 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.09.026 Michalski, 2018, Effect of standard vs dose-escalated radiation therapy for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer: the NRG oncology RTOG 0126 randomized clinical trial, JAMA Oncol, 4, e180039, 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0039 Lee, 2016, Randomized phase III noninferiority study comparing two radiotherapy fractionation schedules in patients with low-risk prostate cancer, J Clin Oncol, 34, 2325, 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.0448 Dearnaley, 2016, Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial, Lancet Oncol, 17, 1047, 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30102-4 Catton, 2017, Randomized trial of a hypofractionated radiation regimen for the treatment of localized prostate cancer, J Clin Oncol, 35, 1884, 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.7397 Incrocci, 2016, Hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with localised prostate cancer (HYPRO): final efficacy results from a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial, Lancet Oncol, 17, 1061, 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30070-5 Hoffman, 2018, Randomized trial of hypofractionated, dose-escalated, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) versus conventionally fractionated IMRT for localized prostate cancer, J Clin Oncol, 36, 2943, 10.1200/JCO.2018.77.9868 Widmark, 2019, Ultra-hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the HYPO-RT-PC randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial, Lancet, 394, 385, 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31131-6 Fuller, 2018, Phase 2 multicenter trial of heterogeneous-dosing stereotactic body radiotherapy for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes, Eur Urol Oncol, 1, 540, 10.1016/j.euo.2018.06.013 Kishan, 2019, Long-term outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy for low-risk and intermediate-risk prostate cancer, JAMA Netw Open, 2, e188006, 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.8006 Castro, 2013, Germline BRCA mutations are associated with higher risk of nodal involvement, distant metastasis, and poor survival outcomes in prostate cancer, J Clin Oncol, 31, 1748, 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.1882 Na, 2017, Germline mutations in ATM and BRCA1/2 distinguish risk for lethal and indolent prostate cancer and are associated with early age at death, Eur Urol, 71, 740, 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.11.033