Interest of cervical ripening using double balloon catheters for labour induction in term nulliparous women

INSERM, 2017, 161 Bishop, 1964, Pelvic scoring for elective induction, Obstet Gynecol, 24, 266 Autorit´e de Sant´e, 2008, 15 World Health Organization, 2011, 1 Cromi, 2011, Is transcervical Foley catheter actually slower than prostaglandins in ripening the cervix? A randomized study, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 204, 338.e1, 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.11.029 Boyon, 2014, Maturation cervicale: Y a-t-il un avantage a` utiliser un double ballonnet pour le d´eclenchement du travail?, Gynecol Obstet Fertil, 42, 674, 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2014.07.035 Peisner, 2019, Transition from latent to active labor, Obstet Gynecol Reis, 2003, Prediction of successful induction of labor at term: role of clinical history, digital examination, ultrasound assessment of the cervix, and fetal fibronectin assay, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 189, 1361, 10.1067/S0002-9378(03)00725-7 Cromi, 2012, A randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: dinoprostone vaginal insert versus double-balloon catheter, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 207, 125.e1, 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.05.020 Jozwiak, 2011, Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial, The Lancet, 378, 2095, 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61484-0 Atad, 1997, Ripening and dilatation of the unfavourable cervix for induction of labour by a double balloon device: experience with 250 cases, BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol, 104, 29, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb10644.x Pennell, 2009, Induction of labour in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised controlled trial comparing double and single balloon catheters and PGE2gel, BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol, 116, 1443, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02279.x McMaster, 2015, Evaluation of a transcervical foley catheter as a source of infection, Obstet Gynecol, 126, 539, 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001002