Interactive metadiscourse in research articles: A comparative study of paradigmatic and disciplinary influences

Journal of Pragmatics - Tập 66 - Trang 15-31 - 2014
Fangli Cao1,2, Guangwei Hu1
1English Language and Literature, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, 1 Nanyang Walk, Singapore 637616, Singapore
2Xi'An International Studies University, China

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Abdi, 2002, Interpersonal metadiscourse: an indicator of interaction and identity, Discourse Studies, 4, 139, 10.1177/14614456020040020101

Abdi, 2010, The cooperative principle in discourse communities and genres: a framework for the use of metadiscourse, Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 1669, 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.11.001

Abdollahzadeh, 2011, Poring over the findings: interpersonal authorial engagement in applied linguistics papers, Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 288, 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.019

Ädel, 2006

Ädel, 2010, Metadiscourse: diverse and divided perspectives, Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9, 1, 10.35360/njes.215

Aguilar, 2008

Alise, 2010, A continuation of the paradigm wars?. Prevalence rates of methodological approaches across the social/behavioral sciences, Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4, 103, 10.1177/1558689809360805

Beauvais, 1989, A speech act theory of metadiscourse, Written Communication, 6, 11, 10.1177/0741088389006001002

Becher, 2001

Benson, 2009, Qualitative research in language teaching and learning journals, 1997–2006, The Modern Language Journal, 93, 79, 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00829.x

Bernstein, 1996

Bernstein, 1999, Vertical and horizontal discourse: an essay, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20, 157, 10.1080/01425699995380

Biber, 1999

Blakemore, 2002

Bunton, 1999, The use of higher level metatext in Ph.D. theses, English for Specific Purposes, 18, S41, 10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00022-2

Carter, 2007, Justifying knowledge, justifying method, taking action: epistemologies, methodologies, and methods in qualitative research, Qualitative Health Research, 17, 1316, 10.1177/1049732307306927

Cohen, 1988

Cohen, 2007

Creswell, 2009

Cuenca, 2007, Contrasting the form and use of reformulation markers, Discourse Studies, 9, 149, 10.1177/1461445607075347

Dahl, 2004, Textual metadiscourse in research articles: a marker of national culture or of academic discipline?, Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1807, 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.004

Del Saz Rubio, 2011, A pragmatic approach to the macro-structure and metadiscoursal features of research article introductions in the field of agricultural sciences, English for Specific Purposes, 3, 258, 10.1016/j.esp.2011.03.002

Field, 2009

Firestone, 1987, Meaning in method: the rhetoric of quantitative and qualitative research, Educational Researcher, 16, 16, 10.3102/0013189X016007016

Fuertes-Olivera, 2001, Persuasion and advertising English: metadiscourse in slogans and headlines, Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 1291, 10.1016/S0378-2166(01)80026-6

Gardezi, 2009, Variation in the writing of economics students in Britain and Pakistan: the case of conjunctive ties, 236

Guba, 1990, The alternative paradigm dialog, 17

Guba, 1989

Guba, 2005, Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, 191

Habermas, 1971

Halliday, 1976

Hansen, 1988, Rhetoric and epistemology in the social sciences: a contrast of two representative texts, 167

Harper, 2008, Clinical psychology, 430

Hempel, 2008, Sequencers in different text genres: academic writing, journalese and fiction, Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 676, 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.02.001

Holliday, 2007

Hood, 2010

Hood, 2011, Writing discipline: comparing inscriptions of knowledge and knowers in academic writing, 106

Hu, 2014, Disciplinary and ethnolinguistic influences on citation in research articles, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 14, 14, 10.1016/j.jeap.2013.11.001

Hyland, 1998, Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge, Text, 18, 349, 10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349

Hyland, 1998, Persuasion and context: the pragmatics of academic metadiscourse, Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 437, 10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00009-5

Hyland, 1999, Academic attribution: citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge, Applied Linguistics, 20, 341, 10.1093/applin/20.3.341

Hyland, 2000

Hyland, 2005

Hyland, 2005, Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse, Discourse Studies, 7, 173, 10.1177/1461445605050365

Hyland, 2007, Applying a gloss: exemplifying and reformulating in academic discourse, Applied Linguistics, 28, 266, 10.1093/applin/amm011

Hyland, 2004, Metadiscourse in academic writing: a reappraisal, Applied Linguistics, 25, 156, 10.1093/applin/25.2.156

Ifantidou, 2005, The semantics and pragmatics of metadiscourse, Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1325, 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.11.006

ISI Web of Science, 2011

Johnson, 2012

Khedri, 2013, An exploration of interactive metadiscourse markers in academic research article abstracts in two disciplines, Discourse Studies, 15, 319, 10.1177/1461445613480588

Kidd, 2002, The role of qualitative research in psychological journals, Psychological Methods, 7, 126, 10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.126

Kuhn, 1970

Latour, 1986

Lin, 2012, Structural patterns in empirical research articles: a cross-disciplinary study, English for Specific Purposes, 31, 150, 10.1016/j.esp.2011.10.002

Madigan, 1995, The language of psychology: APA style as epistemology, American Psychologist, 50, 428, 10.1037/0003-066X.50.6.428

Martin, 2003

Maton, 2000, Languages of legitimation: the structuring significance for intellectual fields of strategic knowledge claims, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21, 147, 10.1080/713655351

Maton, 2007, Knowledge-knower structures in intellectual and educational fields, 87

Maton, 2010, Analysing knowledge claims and practices: languages of legitimation, 35

Mauranen, 1993

McGrath, 2012, Stance and engagement in pure mathematics research articles: linking discourse features to disciplinary practices, English for Specific Purposes, 31, 161, 10.1016/j.esp.2011.11.002

Moed, 2005

Mur Dueñas, 2009, Logical markers in L1 (Spanish and English) and L2 (English) business research articles, English Text Construction, 2, 246, 10.1075/etc.2.2.07mur

Mur Dueñas, 2011, An intercultural analysis of metadiscourse features in research articles written in English and in Spanish, Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 3068, 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.002

Murillo, 2004, A relevance reassessment of reformulation markers, Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 2059, 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.01.006

O’Donnell, 2012

Peacock, 2010, Linking adverbials in research articles across eight disciplines, Ibérica, 20, 9

Peterlin, 2005, Text-organizing metatext in research articles: an English-Slovene contrastive analysis, English for Specific Purposes, 24, 307, 10.1016/j.esp.2004.11.001

Russo, 2008

Sallinen, 2009, Distinctive linguistic features of qualitative and quantitative research reporting: comparing research papers in nursing science, 202

Smith, 2002, Constructing knowledge: the role of graphs and tables in hard and soft psychology, American Psychologist, 57, 749, 10.1037/0003-066X.57.10.749

Swales, 1990

Teddlie, 2007, Mixed-methods sampling: a typology with examples, Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 77, 10.1177/2345678906292430

Vande Kopple, 1985, Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse, College Composition and Communication, 36, 82, 10.2307/357609

White, 2011, Relevance theory and citations, Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 3345, 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.07.005

Wignell, 2007, Vertical and horizontal discourse and the social sciences, 184