Interaction of bottom-up and top-down processes in the perception of ambiguous figures

Vision Research - Tập 89 - Trang 24-31 - 2013
Monika Intaitė1, Valdas Noreika2, Alvydas Šoliūnas3, Christine M. Falter4
1Visual Neuroscience Laboratory, IBILI, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
2Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
3Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
4Department of Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bruner, 1955, Perceptual identification and perceptual organization, The Journal of General Psychology, 53, 21, 10.1080/00221309.1955.9710133 Bugelski, 1961, The role of frequency in developing perceptual sets, Canadian Journal of Psychology, 15, 205, 10.1037/h0083443 Chastain, 1975, The first glimpse determines the perception of an ambiguous figure, Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 221, 10.3758/BF03203203 Girgus, 1977, The effect of knowledge of reversibility on the reversibility of ambiguous figures, Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 550, 10.3758/BF03198762 Goolkasian, 1987, Ambiguous figures: Role of context and critical features, Journal of General Psychology, 114, 217 Hochberg, 1987, Piecemeal organization and cognitive components in object perception: Perceptually coupled responses to moving objects, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 370, 10.1037/0096-3445.116.4.370 Holm, 1979, A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65 Howell, 2009 Intaitė, 2013, Perceptual reversals of Necker stimuli during intermittent presentation with limited attentional resources, Psychophysiology, 50, 82, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01486.x Kornmeier, 2012, Ambiguous figures – What happens in the brain when perception changes but not the stimulus, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 1, 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00051 Kornmeier, 2009, Multistable perception: When bottom- up and top-down coincide, Brain and Cognition, 69, 138, 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.06.005 Lehky, 1988, An astable multivibrator model of binocular rivalry, Perception, 17, 215, 10.1068/p170215 Leopold, 1999, Multistable phenomena: Changing views in perception, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 254, 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01332-7 Long, 2012, Dissecting perceptual processes with a new tri-stable reversible figure, Perception, 41, 1163, 10.1068/p7313 Long, 2007, How to keep a reversible figure from reversing: Teasing out top-down and bottom-up processes, Perception, 35, 431, 10.1068/p5630 Long, 1999, To reverse or not to reverse: When is an ambiguous figure not ambiguous?, American Journal of Psychology, 112, 41, 10.2307/1423624 Long, 2002, Configural biases and reversible figures: Evidence of multilevel grouping effects, American Journal of Psychology, 115, 581, 10.2307/1423528 Long, 1994, A new twist on the rotating-trapezoid illusion: Evidence for neural-adaptation effects, Perception, 23, 619, 10.1068/p230619 Long, 2004, Enduring interest in perceptual ambiguity: Alternating views of reversible figures, Psychological Bulletin, 130, 748, 10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.748 Long, 1983, As the cube turns: Evidence for two processes in the perception of a dynamic reversible figure, Perception & Psychophysics, 34, 29, 10.3758/BF03205893 Long, 1992, Prime time: Fatigue and set effects in the perception of reversible figures, Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 609, 10.3758/BF03211697 Noest, 2007, Percept-choice sequences driven by interrupted ambiguous stimuli: A low-level neural model, Journal of Vision, 7, 1, 10.1167/7.8.10 Oldfield, 1971, The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory, Neuropsychologia, 9, 97, 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 Orbach, 1963, Reversibility of the Necker cube: I. An examination of the concept of “satiation of orientation”, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 17, 439, 10.2466/pms.1963.17.2.439 Rock, 1994, Why do ambiguous figures reverse?, Acta Psychologica, 87, 33, 10.1016/0001-6918(94)90065-5 Rock, 1992, Further evidence of failure of reversal of ambiguous figures by uninformed subjects, Perception, 21, 39, 10.1068/p210039 Strüber, 1999, Differences in top–down influences on the reversal rate of different categories of reversible figures, Perception, 28, 1185, 10.1068/p2973 Toppino, 2003, Reversible-figure perception: Mechanisms of intentional control, Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 1285, 10.3758/BF03194852 Toppino, 1987, Selective adaptation with reversible figures: Don’t change that channel, Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 37, 10.3758/BF03211512 von Grünau, 1984, The local character of perspective organization, Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 319, 10.3758/BF03206335 Wallace, 1988, Hypnotic susceptibility, visual distraction and reports of Necker cube apparent reversals, The Journal of General Psychology, 115, 389, 10.1080/00221309.1988.9710575 Wilson, 2003, Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 14499, 10.1073/pnas.2333622100