Interaction of arbekacin with dialysis membrane

Renal Replacement Therapy - Tập 2 - Trang 1-8 - 2016
Motoki Urata1, Yuki Narita1, Daisuke Kadowaki1, Kazutaka Tanoue2, Issei Tashiro3, Masaki Fukunaga1, Akitomo Shibata4, Yutaka Yoshida5, Kazuaki Soejima6, Sumio Hirata1
1Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Center for Clinical Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Chuo-ku, Japan
2Mimata-nakamachi-ten, Sogo-Pharmacy, Sogo-Medical Co., Ltd., Mimata-cho, Japan
3Department of Pharmacy, Shin-takeo Hospital, Takeo, Japan
4Department of Pharmacy, Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital, Minami-ku, Japan
5Department of Clinical Engineering, Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital, Minami-ku, Japan
6Department of Urology and Nephrology, Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital, Minami-ku, Japan

Tóm tắt

The interaction between arbekacin and the hemodialysis membrane is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the adsorption of arbekacin (ABK) onto hemodialysis membranes and to establish a simpler system for evaluating the adsorption properties of the drug. First, small cut pieces of polysulfone or sulfonated polyacrylonitrile (AN69) hollow fiber membranes were stirred in a solution of ABK for the qualitative assessment. Then, we designed the experimental system that was approximately 1/100 of the actual size using a small dialyzer “mini-module” of our original design for the polysulfone or AN69. We circulated ABK solution in this system for the quantitative assessment. Finally, we administered ABK in subjects undergoing hemodialysis as a clinical trial to evaluate the adsorption of ABK onto polysulfone or AN69. In the qualitative assessment, the rates of ABK adsorption onto polysulfone and AN69 were 6.2 ± 2.9 and 49.8 ± 1.8 %, respectively. In the quantitative assessment, although there was almost no change in the circulating ABK concentration with the use of polysulfone, there was about 68 % decrease in the circulating ABK concentration with the use of AN69. In the clinical trial, clearance by the dialyzer using AN69 was high at 10 min after starting dialysis, despite the sieving coefficient being 0. However, reduction of ABK clearance was observed with time; the removal rate of ABK at the completion of the dialysis using polysulfone or AN69 was about 67 %, with no difference between the two membranes. The main limitation of this study was the small sample size in the clinical trial. These findings suggest that ABK is adsorbed onto AN69. Furthermore, the present adsorption experiment with a mini-module was considered useful as an evaluation system because it was easy to handle, using less solvent and drugs compared with a previous report, and it reflected the results of the clinical trial.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Aoki Y. Bactericidal activity of arbekacin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Comparison with that of vancomycin. Jpn J Antibiot. 1994;47:640–6. Okada K, Kimura T, Mikamo H, Kasahara K, Seki M, Takakuraet S, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring of arbekacin: a consensus review of the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and the Japanese Society of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. J Infect Chemother. 2014;20:1–5. Yamasaku F, Suzuki Y, Shinkai S, Shomura T, Komiya I. Pharmacokinetics of HBK in healthy adult volunteers. Chemotherapy. 1986;34:117–28. Totsuka K, Shimizu K, Mitomi N, Niizato T, Araake M. Evaluation of once-daily administration of arbekacin. Experimental study and determination of pharmacokinetic properties in man. Jpn J Antibiot. 1994;47:676–92. Fillastre JP, Leroy A, Humbert G, Moulin B, Bernadet P, Josse S. Pharmacokinetics of habekacin in patients with renal insufficiency. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987;31:575–7. Matsuo H, Hayashi J, Ono K, Andoh K, Andoh Y, Sano Y, et al. Administration of aminoglycosides to hemodialysis patients immediately before dialysis: a new dosing modality. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:2597–601. Jaradat MI, Moe SM. Effect of hemodialysis membranes on beta 2-microglobulin amyloidosis. Semin Dial. 2001;14:107–12. Tian Q, Gomersall CD, Ip M, Tan PE, Joynt GM, Choi GY. Adsorption of amikacin, a significant mechanism of elimination by hemofiltration. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:1009–13. Inagaki O, Nishian Y, Iwaki R, Nakagawa K, Takamitsu Y, Fujita Y. Adsorption of nafamostat mesilate by hemodialysis membranes. Artif Organs. 1992;16:553–8. Nagasaka H, Miyazaki T, Naito H. Drugs adsorption characteristics of various dialysis membranes. Jpn J Artif Organs. 1990;19:670–3. Urata M, Hirata S, Izumi S, Furukubo T, Ota M, Fijita M, et al. Adsorption of arbekacin onto dialysis membranes in vitro. Jpn J TDM. 2004;21:273–9. Takesawa S, Hidai H, Sakai K. Measurment of low molecular proteins adsorption on hemodialysis membranes. Jpn J Artif Organs. 1990;19:666–9. Kumon H, Mizuno A, Nasu Y, Tsugawa M, Kishi M, Ohmori H. Pharamacokinetics of arbekacin in healthy volunteers and patients with renal insufficiency. Jpn J Antibiot. 1989;42:200–7. Thomas M, Valette P, Mausset AL, Déjardin P. High molecular weight kininogen adsorption on hemodialysis membranes: influence of pH and relationship with contact phase activation of blood plasma. influence of pre-treatment with poly(ethyleneimine). Int J Artif Organs. 2000;23:20–6.