Interaction effects in simultaneous motor control and movement perception tasks

Blakemore SJ and Frith C (2005). The role of motor contagion in the prediction of action. Neuropsychologia 43(2): 260–267 Brass M, Bekkering H, Wohlschlager A and Prinz W (2000). Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues. Brain Cogn 44(2): 124–143 Brass M, Bekkering H and Prinz W (2001). Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. Acta Psychol 106: 3–22 Buccino G, Binkofski F, Fink GR, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Gallese V, Seitz RJ, Zilles K, Rizzolatti G and Freund H-J (2001). Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. Eur J Neurosci 13: 400–404 Cochin S, Barthelemy C, Lejeune B, Roux S and Martineau J (1998). Perception of motion and qEEG activity in human adults. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 107: 287–295 Craighero L, Fadiga L, Rizzolatti G and Umilta C (1998). Visuomotor priming. Visual Cogn 5(1): 109–125 Craighero L, Bello A, Fadiga L and Rizzolatti G (2002). Hand action preparation influences the responses to hand pictures. Neuropsychologia 40: 492–502 Cutting JE (1978). A biomechanical invariant of gait perception. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform 4: 357–372 Dekeyser M, Verfaillie K and Vanrie J (2002). Creating stimuli for the study of biological-motion perception. Behav Res Methods, Instrum Comput 34: 375–382 Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Gallese V, Rizzolatti G and Pelligrino G (1992). Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study. Exp Brain Res 91: 176–180 Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Pavesi G and Rizzolatti G (1995). Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. J Neurophysiol 73: 2608–2611 Flash T and Hogan N (1985). The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. J Neurosci 5(7): 1688–1703 Grafton ST, Arbib MA, Fadiga L and Rizzolatti G (1996). Localization of grasp representations in humans by positron emission tomography: 2. Observation compared with imagination. Exp Brain Res 112: 103–111 Heyes C, Bird G, Johnson H and Haggard P (2005). Experience modulates automatic imitation. Cogn Brain Res 22: 233–240 Holden MK and Dyar T (2002). Virtual environment training: a new tool for rehabilitation. Neurol Rep 26(2): 62–71 Iacoboni M, Woods RP, Brass M, Bekkering H, Mazziotta JC and Rizzolatti G (1999). Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science 286: 2526–2528 Jacobs A and Shiffrar M (2005). Walking perception by walking observers. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform 31: 157–169 Jeannerod M (1994). The representing brain: neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behav Brain Sci 17(2): 187–245 Johansson G (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Percept Psychophys 14: 201–211 Kilner JM, Paulignan Y and Blakemore SJ (2003). An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Curr Biol 13(6): 522–525 Lyons DE, Santos LR and Keil FC (2006). Reflections of other minds: how primate social cognition can inform the function of mirror neurons. Curr Opin Neurobiol 16(2): 230–239 Ma YL, Paterson H and Pollick FE (2006). A motion-capture library for the study of identity, gender, and emotion perception from biological motion. Behav Res Methods, Instrum Comput 38(1): 134–141 Mather G and Murdoch L (1994). Gender discrimination in biological motion displays based on dynamic cues. Proc Royal Soc Lond B 258: 273–279 Oberman LM, Hubbard EM, McCleery JP, Altschuler EL, Ramachandran VS and Pineda JA (2005). EEG evidence for mirror neuron dysfunction in autism spectrum disorders. Cogn Brain Res 24(2): 190–198 Pollick FE, Paterson HM, Bruderlin A and Sanford AJ (2001). Perceiving affect from arm movement. Cogn 82: B51–B61 Press C, Bird G, Flach R and Heyes C (2005). Robotic movement elicits automatic imitation. Cogn Brain Res 25(3): 632–640 Rizzolatti G and Craighero L (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci 27: 169–192 Rizzolatti G, Fadiga L, Gallese V and Fogassi L (1996a). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cogn Brain Res 3(2): 131–141 Rizzolatti G, Fadiga L, Matelli M, Bettinardi V, Paulesu E, Perani D and Fazio F (1996b). Localization of grasp representation in humans by PET: 1. Observation versus execution. Exp Brain Res 111(2): 246–252 Runeson S and Frykholm G (1981). Visual perception of lifted weight. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform 7(4): 733–740 Runeson S and Frykholm G (1983). Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person and action perception: Expectation, gender recognition and deceptive intention. J Exp Psychol: General 112: 585–615 Sakreida K, Schubotz RI, Wolfenstellar U and von Cramon DY (2005). Motion class dependency in observer’s motor areas revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 25(6): 1335–1342 Shiffrar M and Pinto J (2002). The visual analysis of bodily motion. In: Prinz, W and Hommel, B (eds) Common mechanisms in perception and action: attention and performance, vol. XIX, pp 381–399. Oxford University Press, Oxford Stefan K, Cohen LG, Duque J, Mazzocchio R, Celnik P, Sawaki L, Ungerleider L and Classen J (2005). Formation of a motor memory by action observation. J Neurosci 25(41): 9339–9346 Troje NF (2002). Decomposing biological motion: a framework for the analysis and synthesis of human gait patterns. J Vision 2: 371–387 Troje NF, Westhoff C and Lavrov M (2005). Person identification from biological motion: effects of structural and kinematic cues. Percept Psychophys 67(4): 667–675 Wheaton KJ, Thompson JC, Syngeniotis A, Abbott DF and Puce A (2004). Viewing the motion of human body parts activates different regions of premotor, temporal, and parietal cortex. Neuroimage 22: 277–288 Viviani P and Stucchi N (1992). Biological movements look uniform: evidence of motor-perceptual interactions. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform 18(3): 603–623