Integrating image fusion with nanoparticle contrast agents for diagnosis: a review
Tóm tắt
As newer technologies in the field of medical imaging continue to expand, development of unique techniques for optimizing image quality and minimizing radiation dose becomes very necessary for improve diagnosis of pathologies and patient safety. Different types of medical imaging devices have been developed for specific diagnostic purposes. This article provides a brief overview on the need for co-registration of some medical images into a single image (image fusion), advantages of some nanoparticle contrast agents in medical imaging, and a discussion of present and future role of integrating image fusion with nanoparticle contrast agents in diagnosis. The use of nanoparticle contrast agents together with image fusion is a promising technique in future medical imaging as is likely to reveal pathologies of ≤ 1 nm sizes.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Mahan MM, Doiron AL (2018) Gold nanoparticles as X-ray, CT, and multimodal imaging contrast agents: formulation, targeting, and methodology. J Nanomater 2018
Mishra HOS, Bhatnagar S (2014) MRI and CT image fusion based on wavelet transform. Int J Inf Commun Technol 4(1):47–52
Giesel FL, Mehndiratta A, Locklin J, McAuliffe MJ, White S, Choyke PL et al (2009) Image fusion using CT, MRI and PET for treatment planning, navigation and follow up in percutaneous RFA. Exp Oncol 31(2):106
Chapman S, Dobrovolskaia M, Farahani K, Goodwin A, Joshi A, Lee H et al (2013) Nanoparticles for cancer imaging: the good, the bad, and the promise. Nano Today 8(5):454–460
Kiessling F, Mertens ME, Grimm J, Lammers T (2014) Nanoparticles for imaging: top or flop? Radiology 273(1):10–28
Cheng, C. P. (2019). Medical imaging modalities and protocols. In Handbook of Vascular Motion (pp. 23-43). Academic Press.
Perry Sprawls (2001). Magnetic resonance imaging system components, Online Edition provided With Open Access by Sprawls Educational Foundation. Database: http://www.sprawls.org/mripmt/MRI02/index.html. Accessed 10th June, 2020.
Berger A (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 324(7328):35 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7328.35
Pimlott SL, Sutherland A (2011) Molecular tracers for the PET and SPECT imaging of disease. Chem Soc Rev 40(1):149–162
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2019). Radiation emitting products – computed tomography (CT). Database: https://www.fda.gov/radiation-emitting-products/medical-x-ray-imaging/computed-tomography-ct. Accessed 9th June, 2020.
Freudenrich, Craig (2001). “How ultrasound works.” How Stuff Works. Database https://www.physics.utoronto.ca/~jharlow/teaching/phy138_0708/lec04/ultrasoundx.pdf. Accessed 22nd August, 2019.
Rosen JE, Yoffe S, Meerasa A, Verma M, Gu FX (2011) Nanotechnology and diagnostic imaging: new advances in contrast agent technology. J Nanomed Nanotechnol 2(5):115–126
Kim J, Chhour P, Hsu J, Litt HI, Ferrari VA, Popovtzer R, Cormode DP (2017) Use of nanoparticle contrast agents for cell tracking with computed tomography. Bioconjug Chem 28(6):1581–1597
Shung, K. Kirk (2003) “Recent advances in ultrasonic imaging.” In Frontiers in Biomedical Engineering, Springer, Boston, MA, pp. 233-245
Silverman RH (2009) High-resolution ultrasound imaging of the eye–a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 37(1):54–67
El-Gamal FEZA, Elmogy M, Atwan A (2016) Current trends in medical image registration and fusion. Egyptian Informatics Journal 17(1):99–124
Brown LG (1992) A survey of image registration techniques. ACM computing surveys (CSUR) 24(4):325–376
Song G, Han J, Zhao Y, Wang Z, Du H (2017) A review on medical image registration as an optimization problem. Current Medical Imaging 13(3):274–283
Hill DL, Batchelor PG, Holden M, Hawkes DJ (2001) Medical image registration. Phys Med Biol 46(3):R1
Mohammed HA, Hassan MA (2016) The image registration techniques for medical imaging (MRI-CT). American Journal of Biomedical Engineering 6(2):53–58
Moghe AA, Singhai J (2013) Image registration: a review of elastic registration methods applied to medical imaging. Int J Comput Appl 70(7)
Duygu Tosun-Turgut. Rigid image registration. Center for Imaging of Neurodegenerative Diseases Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging. Database: https://cind.ucsf.edu/sites/cind.ucsf.edu/files/wysiwyg/education/RigidRegistration.pdf. Accessed 20th August, 2020.
Unnikrishnan S, Klibanov AL (2012) Microbubbles as ultrasound contrast agents for molecular imaging: preparation and application. Am J Roentgenol 199(2):292–299
Yim, H., Seo, S., & Na, K. (2011). MRI contrast agent-based multifunctional materials: diagnosis and therapy. Journal of Nanomaterials, 2011.
Caravan P, Ellison JJ, McMurry TJ, Lauffer RB (1999) Gadolinium (III) chelates as MRI contrast agents: structure, dynamics, and applications. Chem Rev 99(9):2293–2352
Zhou Z, Lu ZR (2013) Gadolinium-based contrast agents for magnetic resonance cancer imaging. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology 5(1):1–18
Hahn MA, Singh AK, Sharma P, Brown SC, Moudgil BM (2011) Nanoparticles as contrast agents for in-vivo bioimaging: current status and future perspectives. Anal Bioanal Chem 399(1):3–27
De Silva R, Gutierrez LF, Raval AN, McVeigh ER, Ozturk C, Lederman RJ (2006) Clinical perspective. Circulation 114(22):2342–2350
Hopp T, Baltzer P, Dietzel M, Kaiser WA, Ruiter NV (2012) 2D/3D image fusion of X-ray mammograms with breast MRI: visualizing dynamic contrast enhancement in mammograms. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 7(3):339–348
Nune SK et al (2009) Nanoparticles for biomedical imaging. Expert opinion on drug delivery 6(11):1175–1194
Boas FE, Fleischmann D (2012) CT artifacts: causes and reduction techniques. Imaging in medicine 4(2):229–240
Cormode DP, Naha PC, Fayad ZA (2014) Nanoparticle contrast agents for computed tomography: a focus on micelles. Contrast media & molecular imaging 9(1):37–52
Fass L (2008) Imaging and cancer: a review. Mol Oncol 2(2):115–115