Integrating fuzzy theory and hierarchy concepts to evaluate software quality

Che‐Wei Chang1, Cheng‐Ru Wu2, Hung‐Lung Lin3
1Department of Information Management, Yuanpei University, Hsin Chu, Taiwan R.O.C
2Graduate Institute of Business Management, Yuanpei University, Hsin Chu, Taiwan, R.O.C.
3Department of Business Administration, National Central University, Jhongli City, Taiwan R.O.C

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Buckley, J. J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17, 233–247.

Cesar, G. P., Tom, M., & Brian, H. S. (2005). A metamodel for assessable software development methodologies. Software Quality Journal, 13(2), 195–214.

Deng, H. (1999). Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pair-wise comparisons. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 21, 215–231.

Deutsch, M. S., & Wills, R. R. (1998). Software quality engineering; a total technical and management approach. Prentic-Hall, Inc.

ISO/IEC9126-1 (2001). Software engineering—product quality— part1: Quality model.

Issac, G., Rajendran, C., & Anantharaman, R. N. (2006). An instrument for the measurement of customer perceptions of quality management in the software industry: An empirical study in India. Software Quality Journal, 14(4), 291–308.

Kazman, R., Bass, L., Klein, M., Lattanze, T., & Northrop, L. (2005). A basis for analyzing software architecture analysis methods. Software Quality Journal, 13(4), 329–355.

Khoshgoftaar, T. M., Herzberg, A., & Seliya, N. (2006b). Resource oriented selection of rule-based classification models: An empirical case study. Software Quality Journal, 14(4), 309–338.

Khoshgoftaar, T. M., Seliya, N., & Sundaresh, N. (2006a). An empirical study of predicting software faults with case-based reasoning. Software Quality Journal, 14(2), 85–111.

Kima, S. S., Yang, I. O., Yeo, M. S., & Kim, K. W. (2005). Development of a housing performance evaluation model for multi-family residential buildings in Korea. Building and Environment, 40, 1103–1116.

Lious, T. S., & Wang, M. J. J. (1992). Ranking fuzzy numbers with integral value. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 50(3), 247–255.

Liu, F., Noguchi, K., Dhungana, A., Srirangam, A. V. V. N. S. N., & Inuganti, P. (2006). A quantitative approach for setting technical targets based on impact analysis in software quality function deployment. Software Quality Journal, 14(2), 113–134.

Ngai, E. W. T (2003). Selection of web sits for online advertising using the AHP. Information and Management, 46, 669–678.

Ossadnik, W., & Lange, O. (1999). AHP-based evaluation of AHP-Software. European Journal of Operational Research, 118(2), 578–588.

Pressman, R. S. (2001). Software engineering a practitioner’s approach. Fifth Edition, McGraw Hill.

Rafla, T., Robillard, P. N., & Desmarais, M. C. (2007). A method to elicit architecturally sensitive usability requirements: its integration into a software development process. Software Quality Journal, 15(2), 117–133.

Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw Hill.

Saaty, T. L. (1988). Multicriteria decision making: The analytic hierarchy process. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.

Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to mark a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9–26.

Schulmeyer, G. G., & McManus, J. I. (1996). Total quality management for software quality. Southern Africa: International Thomson Pub.

Word, W. A., & Venkataraman, B. (1999). Some observations on software quality. In Proceedings of the 37th annual Southeast regional conference, April 1999.

Zadeh, L. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information Control, 8, 338–353.

Zhu, L., Aurum, A., Gorton, I., & Jeffery, R. (2005). Tradeoff and sensitivity analysis in software architecture evaluation using analytic hierarchy process. Software Quality Journal, 13(4), 357–375.