Integrating disciplinary-specific genre structure in discourse strategies to support disciplinary literacy

Linguistics and Education - Tập 43 - Trang 1-12 - 2018
Natasha Anne Rappa1, Kok-Sing Tang2
1School of Education, Murdoch University, 90 South St, Murdoch, WA, 6150, Australia
2School of Education, Curtin University, 1 Kent St, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia

Tài liệu tham khảo

Tang, 2015, The PRO instructional strategy in the construction of scientific explanations, Teaching Science, 61, 14 Tang, 2016, Constructing scientific explanations through premise–reasoning–outcome (PRO): an exploratory study to scaffold students in structuring written explanations, International Journal of Science Education, 38, 1415, 10.1080/09500693.2016.1192309 Tang, 2016, How is disciplinary literacy addressed in the science classrooms?. A Singaporean case study, Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 39, 220, 10.1007/BF03651975 Tang, 2017, Analyzing teachers’ use of metadiscourse: The missing element in classroom discourse analysis, Science Education, 101, 548, 10.1002/sce.21275 Tang, 2018, The expanding development of literacy research in science education Tang, 2018, Infusing literacy into an inquiry instructional model to support students’ construction of scientific explanations Bilkstad-Balas, 2012, Digital literacy in upper secondary school—What do students use their laptops for during teacher instruction?, Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 7, 81, 10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2012-02-01 Boyd, 2006, How contingent questioning promotes extended student talk: A function of display questions, Journal of Literacy Research, 38, 141, 10.1207/s15548430jlr3802_2 Braaten, 2011, Working toward a stronger conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education, Science Education, 95, 639, 10.1002/sce.20449 Chin, 2006, Classroom interaction in science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students’ responses, International Journal of Science Education, 28, 1315, 10.1080/09500690600621100 Ciechanowski, 2012, Conflicting discourses: Functional linguistic and discourse analyses of Pocahontas texts in bilingual third-grade social studies, Journal of Literacy Research, 44, 300, 10.1177/1086296X12450699 Collins, 2004, Design research: Theoretical & methodological issues, Journal of Learning Sciences, 13, 15, 10.1207/s15327809jls1301_2 Dixon, 1987, The question of genres, 9 Duschl, 2002, Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education, Studies in Science Education, 38, 39, 10.1080/03057260208560187 Edwards, 1987 Erickson, 1992, Ethnographic microanalysis of interaction, 201 1994 Gilbert, 2000, Explanations with models in science education, 193 Halliday, 1978 Halliday, 1993 Hammond, 1999, Critical literacy: Challenges and questions for ESL classrooms, TESOL Quarterly, 33, 528, 10.2307/3587678 Hand, 2002, Influences of writing tasks on students’ answers to recall and higher-level test questions, Research in Science Education, 32, 19, 10.1023/A:1015098605498 Hogan, 1997 Holliday, 1994, The reading-science learning–writing connection: Breakthroughs, barriers, and promises, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 10.1002/tea.3660310905 Hyland, 2005 Ivanic, 2009 Kozma, 2000, The roles of representations and tools in the chemistry laboratory and their implications for chemistry learning, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 105, 10.1207/s15327809jls0902_1 Lemke, 1989, Social semiotics: A new model for literacy education, 289 Lemke, 1990 Luke, 1996, Genres of power? Literacy education and the production of capital, 308 Martin, 1992 Martin, 1993, Literacy in science: Learning to handle text as technology McConachie, 2006, Task, text, and talk: Literacy for all subjects, Educational Leadership, 64, 8 McNeill, 2008, Scientific explanations: Characterizing and evaluating the effects of teachers’ instructional practices on student learning, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 53, 10.1002/tea.20201 Mehan, 1979 Mercer, 2004, Reasoning as a scientist: Ways of helping children to use language to learn science, British Educational Research Journal, 30, 359, 10.1080/01411920410001689689 Moje, 2007, Developing socially just subject-matter instruction: A review of the literature on disciplinary literacy teaching, Review of Research in Education, 31, 1, 10.3102/0091732X07300046001 Moje, 2008, Foregrounding the disciplines in secondary literacy teaching and learning: A call for change, Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52, 96, 10.1598/JAAL.52.2.1 Mortimer, 2003 Nam, 2011, Implementation of the science writing heuristic approach in 8th grade science classrooms, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1111, 10.1007/s10763-010-9250-3 National Research Council, 2014 New London Group, 1996, A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures, Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60, 10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u O’Connor, 1993, Aligning academic task and participation status through revoicing: Analysis of a classroom discourse strategy, Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 24, 318, 10.1525/aeq.1993.24.4.04x0063k Pearson, 2010, Literacy and science: Each in the service of the other, Science, 328, 459, 10.1126/science.1182595 Raimes, 1991, Out of the woods: Emerging traditions in the teaching of writing, TESOL Quarterly, 25, 407, 10.2307/3586978 Sandoval, 2005, The quality of students’ use of evidence in written scientific explanations, Cognition and Instruction, 23, 23, 10.1207/s1532690xci2301_2 Schiffrin, 1980, Meta-talk: Organizational and evaluative brackets in discourse, Sociological Inquiry, 50, 199, 10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00021.x Schleppegrell, 2004 Shanahan, 2008, Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy, Harvard Educational Review, 78, 40, 10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101 Shulman, 1987, Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform, Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1, 10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411 Tang, 2011 Toulmin, 1958 Unsworth, 2001, Evaluating the language of different types of explanations in junior high school science texts, International Journal of Science Education, 23, 585, 10.1080/09500690010006473 Van Zee, 1997, Using questioning to guide student thinking, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 227, 10.1207/s15327809jls0602_3 Vande Kopple, 1997, Refining and applying views of metadiscourse Vande Kopple, 2012, The importance of studying metadiscourse, Applied Research on English Language, 1, 37 Veel, 1997, Learning how to mean-scientifically speaking: Apprenticeship into scientific discourse in the secondary school, 161 Wellington, 2001 Wells, 1993, Reevaluating the IRF sequence: A proposal for the articulation of theories of activity and discourse for the analysis of teaching and learning in the classroom, Linguistics and Education, 5, 1, 10.1016/S0898-5898(05)80001-4 Westgate, 1997, Identifying ‘quality’ in classroom talk: An enduring research task, Language and Education, 11, 125, 10.1080/09500789708666723 Wragg, 2001