Tang, 2015, The PRO instructional strategy in the construction of scientific explanations, Teaching Science, 61, 14
Tang, 2016, Constructing scientific explanations through premise–reasoning–outcome (PRO): an exploratory study to scaffold students in structuring written explanations, International Journal of Science Education, 38, 1415, 10.1080/09500693.2016.1192309
Tang, 2016, How is disciplinary literacy addressed in the science classrooms?. A Singaporean case study, Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 39, 220, 10.1007/BF03651975
Tang, 2017, Analyzing teachers’ use of metadiscourse: The missing element in classroom discourse analysis, Science Education, 101, 548, 10.1002/sce.21275
Tang, 2018, The expanding development of literacy research in science education
Tang, 2018, Infusing literacy into an inquiry instructional model to support students’ construction of scientific explanations
Bilkstad-Balas, 2012, Digital literacy in upper secondary school—What do students use their laptops for during teacher instruction?, Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 7, 81, 10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2012-02-01
Boyd, 2006, How contingent questioning promotes extended student talk: A function of display questions, Journal of Literacy Research, 38, 141, 10.1207/s15548430jlr3802_2
Braaten, 2011, Working toward a stronger conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education, Science Education, 95, 639, 10.1002/sce.20449
Chin, 2006, Classroom interaction in science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students’ responses, International Journal of Science Education, 28, 1315, 10.1080/09500690600621100
Ciechanowski, 2012, Conflicting discourses: Functional linguistic and discourse analyses of Pocahontas texts in bilingual third-grade social studies, Journal of Literacy Research, 44, 300, 10.1177/1086296X12450699
Collins, 2004, Design research: Theoretical & methodological issues, Journal of Learning Sciences, 13, 15, 10.1207/s15327809jls1301_2
Dixon, 1987, The question of genres, 9
Duschl, 2002, Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education, Studies in Science Education, 38, 39, 10.1080/03057260208560187
Edwards, 1987
Erickson, 1992, Ethnographic microanalysis of interaction, 201
1994
Gilbert, 2000, Explanations with models in science education, 193
Halliday, 1978
Halliday, 1993
Hammond, 1999, Critical literacy: Challenges and questions for ESL classrooms, TESOL Quarterly, 33, 528, 10.2307/3587678
Hand, 2002, Influences of writing tasks on students’ answers to recall and higher-level test questions, Research in Science Education, 32, 19, 10.1023/A:1015098605498
Hogan, 1997
Holliday, 1994, The reading-science learning–writing connection: Breakthroughs, barriers, and promises, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 10.1002/tea.3660310905
Hyland, 2005
Ivanic, 2009
Kozma, 2000, The roles of representations and tools in the chemistry laboratory and their implications for chemistry learning, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 105, 10.1207/s15327809jls0902_1
Lemke, 1989, Social semiotics: A new model for literacy education, 289
Lemke, 1990
Luke, 1996, Genres of power? Literacy education and the production of capital, 308
Martin, 1992
Martin, 1993, Literacy in science: Learning to handle text as technology
McConachie, 2006, Task, text, and talk: Literacy for all subjects, Educational Leadership, 64, 8
McNeill, 2008, Scientific explanations: Characterizing and evaluating the effects of teachers’ instructional practices on student learning, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 53, 10.1002/tea.20201
Mehan, 1979
Mercer, 2004, Reasoning as a scientist: Ways of helping children to use language to learn science, British Educational Research Journal, 30, 359, 10.1080/01411920410001689689
Moje, 2007, Developing socially just subject-matter instruction: A review of the literature on disciplinary literacy teaching, Review of Research in Education, 31, 1, 10.3102/0091732X07300046001
Moje, 2008, Foregrounding the disciplines in secondary literacy teaching and learning: A call for change, Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52, 96, 10.1598/JAAL.52.2.1
Mortimer, 2003
Nam, 2011, Implementation of the science writing heuristic approach in 8th grade science classrooms, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1111, 10.1007/s10763-010-9250-3
National Research Council, 2014
New London Group, 1996, A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures, Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60, 10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
O’Connor, 1993, Aligning academic task and participation status through revoicing: Analysis of a classroom discourse strategy, Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 24, 318, 10.1525/aeq.1993.24.4.04x0063k
Pearson, 2010, Literacy and science: Each in the service of the other, Science, 328, 459, 10.1126/science.1182595
Raimes, 1991, Out of the woods: Emerging traditions in the teaching of writing, TESOL Quarterly, 25, 407, 10.2307/3586978
Sandoval, 2005, The quality of students’ use of evidence in written scientific explanations, Cognition and Instruction, 23, 23, 10.1207/s1532690xci2301_2
Schiffrin, 1980, Meta-talk: Organizational and evaluative brackets in discourse, Sociological Inquiry, 50, 199, 10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00021.x
Schleppegrell, 2004
Shanahan, 2008, Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy, Harvard Educational Review, 78, 40, 10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101
Shulman, 1987, Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform, Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1, 10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
Tang, 2011
Toulmin, 1958
Unsworth, 2001, Evaluating the language of different types of explanations in junior high school science texts, International Journal of Science Education, 23, 585, 10.1080/09500690010006473
Van Zee, 1997, Using questioning to guide student thinking, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 227, 10.1207/s15327809jls0602_3
Vande Kopple, 1997, Refining and applying views of metadiscourse
Vande Kopple, 2012, The importance of studying metadiscourse, Applied Research on English Language, 1, 37
Veel, 1997, Learning how to mean-scientifically speaking: Apprenticeship into scientific discourse in the secondary school, 161
Wellington, 2001
Wells, 1993, Reevaluating the IRF sequence: A proposal for the articulation of theories of activity and discourse for the analysis of teaching and learning in the classroom, Linguistics and Education, 5, 1, 10.1016/S0898-5898(05)80001-4
Westgate, 1997, Identifying ‘quality’ in classroom talk: An enduring research task, Language and Education, 11, 125, 10.1080/09500789708666723
Wragg, 2001