Integrating corporate social responsibility and other strategic foci in a distributed production system: a transaction cost perspective on the North Sea offshore petroleum industry

Corporate Governance (Bingley) - Tập 7 Số 2 - Trang 194-208 - 2007
AtleMidttun1, ToreDirdal1, KristianGautesen1, TerjeOmland1, SørenWenstøp1
1The Norwegian School of Management, Sandvika, Norway.

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe purpose of the paper is to explore the challenges of integrating corporate social responsibility (CSR) with other strategic foci into the supply/contractor chain, both conceptually and empirically, with a focus on one sectorial case: the Norwegian upstream petroleum industry. It compares contradictory theories of strategic focus and explores their implications for the organisation of the supply chain and discusses challenges and solutions for operative CSR‐oriented supply chain managementDesign/methodology/approachThe empirical analysis, inspired by the cognitive mapping approach, seeks to elicit the strategic profiles of the oil majors and suppliers/contractors in the petroleum industry. This is based on textual analysis of core statements of overall business strategy such as the CEO's and the Chairman's statement letter to the shareholders. The paper also draws on research and workshops with petroleum companies and their suppliers in the North Sea, as well as contracting experts and researchers taking part in the EU‐TRENDS project which focused on satisfying Europe's future demands and needs for sustainable, secure, safe and clean energy supplies.FindingsThe strategic profiles of the petroleum companies and their suppliers/contractors indicate that, while they coincide on many points, there is considerable discrepancy as far as CSR and HSE are concerned. The suppliers/contractors tend to emphasise the technology dimension more strongly than the petroleum companies. HSE and CSR are, on average, strategically under‐communicated within the supply industry compared with the petroleum companies, but there is also considerable variation within each group.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper explores how transaction cost theory may help frame managerial challenges and approaches in integrating CSR consistently throughout supply chains. It shows some of the limitations of the “rationalist” model of industrial organisation both at the firm level and at the supply chain level and discusses possible expansions into broader managerial approaches.Practical implicationsThe paper highlights some of the managerial challenges and basic approaches for integrating CSR consistently throughout the value chain.Originality/valueThe originality of the article lies conceptually in linking the CSR literature to transaction cost theory of industrial organisation. Empirically the article presents new insights into strategic foci of the petroleum companies and their supply chain.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Ayres, I. and Braithwaite, J. (1992), Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.

Baldwin, R., Scott, C. and Hood, C. (1998), A Reader on Regulation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Bonham, M.G. (1993), “Cognitive mapping as a technique for supporting international negotiation”, Theory and Decision, Vol. 34 No. 3, pp. 255‐73.

Brown Weiss, E. (1999), “The emerging structure of international environmental law”, in Vig, N.J. and Axelrod, R.S. (Eds), The Global Environment, CQ Press, Washington, DC.

Coase, R.H. (1937), “The nature of the firm”, Economica, Vol. 4 No. 16, pp. 386‐405.

Eden, C., Ackerman, F. and Cropper, S. (1992), “The analysis of cause maps”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 309‐24.

Elkington, J. (1998), Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business, New Society Publishing, Gabriola Island.

Fombrun, C.J., Gardberg, N.A. and Sever, J.M. (2000), “The reputation quotient: a multistakeholder measure of corporate reputation”, The Journal of Business Management, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 241‐55.

Fox, T., Ward, H. and Howard, B. (2002), Public Sector Roles in Strengthening Corporate Social Responsibility: A Baseline Study, World Bank Report, October, World Bank, Washington, DC.

Freeman, R.E. and Harrison, J.S. (1999), “Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 42 No. 5, pp. 479‐85.

Fuglseth, A.M. (1989), “Beslutningsstøtte: metode for diagnose av lederes informasjons‐ og situasjonsoppfatninger”, PhD dissertation, Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration, Bergen.

Jensen, M. (2001), “Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function”, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 8‐22.

Langlois, R.N. (2003), “The vanishing hand: the changing dynamics of industrial capitalism”, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 351‐85.

March, J.G. (1991), “Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning”, Organizational Science, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 71‐87.

Sturgeon, T.J. (2002), “Modular production networks: a new American model of industrial organization”, Industrial & Corporate Change, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 451‐96.

Williamson, O.E. (1975), Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, Free Press, New York, NY.

Williamson, O.E. (1979), “Transaction cost economics: the governance of contractual relations”, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 233‐61.

Williamson, O.E. (1985), Economic Institutions of Capitalism, Free Press, New York, NY.

Williamson, O.E. (1993a), “Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization”, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 453‐86.

Williamson, O.E. (1993b), “The evolving science of organization”, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, Vol. 149 No. 1, pp. 36‐63.

Bromley, D. (2002), “Comparing corporate reputations; league tables, quotients, benchmarks or case studies?”, Corporate Reputation Review, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 35‐50.

Friedman, M. (1970), “The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits”, New York Sunday Times Magazine, 13 September.

Larkin, J. (2002), Strategic Reputation Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Moss Kanter, R. (2001), “From spare change to real change: the social sector as beta site for business innovation”, Harvard Business Review on Innovation, Vol. 77 No. 3, pp. 122‐33.

Porter, M. and Kramer, M.R. (2001), “The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy”, Harvard Business Review, December, pp. 57‐68.

Stabell, C. (2001), “New models for value creation and competitive advantage in the petroleum industry”, research report 1/2001, The Norwegian School of Management, Oslo.

Weiss, E.B. (1999), “The emerging structure of international environmental law”, in Vig, N.J. and Axelrod, R.S. (Eds), The Global Environment: Institutions, Law and Policy, Congressional Quarterly Press, Washington, DC.

Zadek, S. (2001), The Civil Corporation: The New Economy of Corporate Citizenship, Earthscan Publications, London.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Corporate Governance (Bingley)

Tập 7 Số 2

194-208

Thông tin tác giả