Integrating Suppliers into Green Product Innovation Development: an Empirical Case Study in the Semiconductor Industry

Business Strategy and the Environment - Tập 20 Số 8 - Trang 527-538 - 2011
Ki‐Hoon Lee1, Ji Whan Kim2
1Griffith Business School, Gold Coast Campus, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia
2(Samsung Global Environment Research Centre, Seoul, Korea)

Tóm tắt

ABSTRACTGreen innovation has been recognized as one of the key factors to achieve environmental and economic success in markets. Understanding green product innovation development as a result of suppliers' involvement has become a strategic priority for academics and practitioners. This paper aims to explore and understand the role of suppliers in enhancing the manufacturer's ability to successfully carry out green innovation in product development. As a research methodology, a case study approach is employed. Primary data were collected through site visits and extensive interviews with corporate and plant management in Korea. Based on the Korean study, the paper presents following outcomes. First, there is a strong linkage between environmental compliance and green new product developments. Second, there is a strategically close relationship of environmental collaboration between suppliers and the buying company through technological integration. Finally, involving key suppliers in green new product development for environmentally demanding customers and markets can bring both environmental and commercial success. This research provides new insights on supplier involvement and green product innovation development in supply chain management. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1002/bse.638

10.1108/14601060910953979

10.5465/amr.2003.8925233

10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00681.x

10.1002/bse.488

10.5465/AME.1998.650515

10.1111/j.1937-5956.2001.tb00077.x

10.1016/S0272-6963(99)00007-8

10.1111/j.1745-493X.2001.tb00102.x

10.1007/s10551-006-9025-5

10.1287/mnsc.47.2.250.9841

10.1108/01443570410538104

10.1016/S1464-391X(06)70584-0

10.1007/s10551-010-0434-0

10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00293.x

10.5465/amj.2007.24160888

European Commission.2007.Competitivenessand Innovation Framework ProgrammeBrussels.

10.1108/01443570010304242

10.1002/(SICI)1099-0836(199609)5:3<188::AID-BSE60>3.0.CO;2-P

10.1016/S0959-6526(00)00013-5

10.1111/j.1745-493X.2002.tb00134.x

10.1080/08956308.2007.11657461

10.1002/bse.422

10.1080/08956308.2005.11657334

Jaffe A, 1995, Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing: what does the evidence tell us?, Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 132

10.1111/j.1467-8551.1996.tb00147.x

10.1108/00251740910978322

10.1108/13598540910942000

10.1002/sd.322

McKinsey & Company, 2008, How companies think about climate change: a McKinsey global survey, The McKinsey Quarterly, 18

10.1002/csr.176

10.1016/j.techfore.2008.03.025

10.3200/ENVT.48.5.22-36

10.1257/jep.9.4.97

Porter M, 2007, A strategic approach to climate, Harvard Business Review, 85, 22

Prahalad C, 1990, The core competence of the corporation, Harvard Business Review, 63, 79

10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00310-1

10.1016/S0969-7012(01)00007-7

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.02.003

10.5465/AME.2003.9474812

10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00062-8

10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020

10.2307/258961

Tischner U, 2001, How to Do Ecodesign?: A Guide for Environmentally and Economically Sound Design

10.1002/eet.475

10.1080/00207540701440303

10.1108/01443570610672248

10.1016/j.pursup.2008.01.007

10.1111/j.1745-493X.1998.tb00042.x

10.1002/tqem.20099

10.1016/S0969-7012(00)00002-2

10.1016/S0969-7012(99)00035-0

Yin R, 2003, Applications of Case Study Research

10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.01.003

10.1016/S0969-7012(00)00007-1