Insurance with Rent Schemes: An Empirical Study of Market Provision and Consumer Demand
Tóm tắt
In the U.K., home contents insurance is widely available, with a reduction in the number of “traditional” insurance companies offering cover being offset by a growth in the availability through “non-traditional” providers such as supermarkets, motoring organizations and even energy providers. Research suggests that while around 80 per cent of all households are covered by home contents insurance, only around 50 per cent of people living in rented or local authority housing insure their contents. The low uptake is undesirable for two reasons. Firstly, financial exclusion is a phenomenon whereby individuals or sectors of society are deliberately, or effectively, denied access to financial services products, including home insurance, and it is commonly government policy to reduce such exclusion. Secondly, possession of contents insurance by householders minimizes the possibility that after a catastrophic loss such as flooding, uninsured persons will seek emergency assistance and temporary housing at the expense of their local authority. Studies and government reports exist that shed light upon the reasons behind the low purchase of conventionally marketed insurance. Special schemes exist to encourage purchase of insurance by enabling home contents insurance for local authority tenants to be paid for along with rent. Governments support such schemes. There appears to be little published research to indicate the extent to which such schemes are used by tenants. We survey local authorities in Scotland to determine the availability of “insurance with rent” schemes and their take-up rate by tenants. We find that many schemes exist, providing average market cover at typically average or lower cost and that there is no evidence of highly selective underwriting and pricing. Despite this easy availability of competitively priced, good policy cover, we find that the take-up rates by tenants are low. We consider reasons why apparently effective insurance products are not more popular. We conclude that local authorities and government need to promote the schemes with greater vigour.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Allen, K. and Rainie, L. (2002) Parents Online, Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
Association of British Insurers (1995) ‘IPT: a good or bad tax?’ Insurance Trends (July), pp. 1–5.
Association of London Authorities (1994) At a Premium: The Cost of Home Contents Insurance to Londoners, London: ALA.
British Bankers Association (2000) ‘Promoting financial inclusion – The work of the Banking industry’, available online atwww.bba.org.uk/public/consumers/1667.
Bronheim, S., Magrab, P. and Crowel, R. (2000) Social Exclusion in the United States: Policy Implications for Community Solutions, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Canadian Co-operative Association (2002) Micro-insurance for Macro Benefits, available online atwww.coopcca.com/pdf/newsletter/IDDigest/Autumn2002/8-AUT02.pdf.
Carvin, A. (2000) ‘Mind the gap: the digital divide as the civil rights issue of the new millennium’, MultiMedia Schools (January/February), available online atwww.infotoday.com/mmscholls/jan00/carvin.htm.
Combes, J. (1998) Preliminary Approach to the Concept of Social Exclusion, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
CRSIS (2003) Regional Financial Inclusion Strategies, Centre for Research into Socially Inclusive Services Edinburgh: Heriot Watt University.
Dancer, H. (2002) ‘Scottish rent to include flood cover’, Insurance Times (8th August).
Davison, E. and Cotten, S.R. (2003) ‘Connection discrepancies: unmasking further layers of the digital divide’, First Monday 8(3). Available online atwww.firstmonday.org/issues/issue8_3/Davison.html.
DFID (2004) Adaptation to Climate Change: Can Insurance Reduce the Vulnerability of the Poor?, London: Department for International Development.
Financial Services Authority (2000) In or Out? Financial Exclusion: A Literature and Research Review, London: Financial Services Authority.
Gill, M. and Turbin, V. (1997) ‘Insurance in the inner-city: Is red-lining fact or fiction?’ The Journal of the Society of Fellows, The Chartered Insurance Institute 11: 29–37.
Hargittai, E. (2002) ‘Second-level digital divide: Differences in people's online skills’, First Monday 7(4). Available online atwww.firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_4/hargittai/index.html.
Highland Council (2004) Home Contents Insurance Schemes – Survey, The Highland Council, Glenurquhart Road, Inverness, Scotland IV3 5NX.
HM Treasury (1999) PAT 14 Access to Financial Services: National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal, available online athttp://www.renewal.net/Documents/RNET/Policy%20Guidance/Accessfinancialservices.pdf.
Kempson, E. and Whyley, C. (1999) Kept Out or Opted Out? Understanding and Combating Financial Exclusion, Bristol: The Policy Press/Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Lewis, H. (1989) Insuring against burglary loss, Research and Planning Unit Paper 52, The Home Office, London.
Mansell, R. (2002) ‘From digital divides to digital entitlements in knowledge Societies’, Current Sociology 50: 407–426.
National Consumer Council (1994) Consumer Concerns 1994: A Consumer Review of Personal Financial Services, London: National Consumer Council.
National Statistics (2003) Family spending: A report on the 2002–2003 expenditure and food survey, TSO, HMSO, London.
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2004) Tackling social exclusion: Taking stock and looking to the future. Emerging findings, Social Exclusion Unit, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London.
OFT (1999) Vulnerable consumers and financial services: A report of the Director General's Enquiry, Office of Fair Trading, London.
Palmer, G., North, J., Carr, J. and Kenway, P. (2003) Monitoring poverty and social exclusion: 2003, New Policy Institute, Joseph Rowantree Foundation.
Palmer, G., Carr, J. and Kenway, P. (2004) Monitoring poverty and social exclusion in Scotland: 2004, New Policy Institute, Joseph Rowantree Foundation.
Scottish Consumer Council (1996) Under cover: Home contents insurance schemes for local authority tenants, Scottish Consumer Council, Glasgow.
Scottish Executive (2003a) A partnership for a better Scotland, Scottish Executive, Edinburgh.
Scottish Executive (2003b) Scotland's people: Results from the 2003 Scottish Household Survey, Annual report: TNS Social and MORI Scotland, A Scottish Executive National Statistics Publication.
Shires, I. (2002) ‘Insuring the uninsured’, Insurance and Financial Services Review (September): 11–12.
Sinclair, S. (2001) Financial Exclusion: an introductory survey, CRSIS: Centre for Research into Socially Inclusive Services, Edinburgh: Heriot Watt University.
USAID (1999) Providing insurance to low-income households; Part 1: A primer on insurance principles and products, Microenterprise Best Practices, Bethesda MD.
USAID (2000) Insurance in low-income communities; Part 2: Initial lessons from micro-insurance experiments for the poor, Microenterprise Best Practices, Bethesda MD.
Whyley, C., McCormick, J. and Kempson, E. (1998a) ‘Why are some people without home contents insurance?’ Insurance Trends 16: 7–12.
Whyley, C., McCormick, J. and Kempson, E. (1998b) Paying for Peace of Mind: Access to Home Contents Insurance for Low-income Households, London: Policy Studies Institute.