Instrumented load tests and layered elastic theory analysis of a large-scale EPS block embankment
Tài liệu tham khảo
Horvath, 1994, Expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam: an introduction to material behavior, Geotext Geomembranes, 13, 263, 10.1016/0266-1144(94)90048-5
Horvath, 1997, The compressible inclusion function of EPS geofoam, Geotext Geomembranes, 15, 77, 10.1016/S0266-1144(97)00008-3
Stark, 2004, National cooperative highway research program. d, national research council (U.S.). transportation research board. JS, Leshchinsky D. Guideline and recommended standard for Geofoam applications in highway embankments, Transport. Res. Board National Research Council
Puppala, 2019, Design and construction of lightweight EPS geofoam embedded geomaterial embankment system for control of settlements, Geotext Geomembranes, 47, 295, 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.01.015
Riad HL, Horvath JS. Analysis and Design of EPS-Geofoam Embankments for Seismic Loading. Geotech. Eng. Transp. Proj., Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2004, p. 2028–37. Doi: 10.1061/40744(154)198.
Keller, 2016, Application of geosynthetics on low-volume roads, Transp Geotech, 8, 119, 10.1016/j.trgeo.2016.04.002
Kim, 2018, Numerical study of earth pressure reduction on rigid walls using EPS geofoam inclusions, Geosynth Int, 25, 180, 10.1680/jgein.18.00001
Athanasopoulos - Zekkos A, Lamote K, Athanasopoulos GA. Use of EPS geofoam compressible inclusions for reducing the earthquake effects on yielding earth retaining structures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2012;41:59–71. Doi: 10.1016/J.SOILDYN.2012.05.004.
Ikizler, 2009, Reductions in swelling pressure of expansive soil stabilized using EPS geofoam and sand, Geosynth Int, 16, 216, 10.1680/gein.2009.16.3.216
Ikizler, 2008, Laboratory study of expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam used with expansive soils, Geotext Geomembranes, 26, 189, 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2007.05.005
Aytekin, 1997, Numerical modeling of EPS geofoam used with swelling soil, Geotext Geomembranes, 15, 133, 10.1016/S0266-1144(97)00010-1
Suits, 2010, Reduction of earth pressure on buried pipes by EPS geofoam inclusions, Geotech Test J, 33
Meguid, 20173, A numerical procedure for the assessment of contact pressures on buried structures overlain by EPS geofoam inclusion, Int J Geosynth Gr Eng
Abdollahi, 2019, Experimental-numerical assessment of geogrid-EPS systems for protecting buried utilities, Geosynth Int, 26, 333, 10.1680/jgein.19.00013
Liyanapathirana, 2016, Application of EPS geofoam in attenuating ground vibrations during vibratory pile driving, Geotext Geomembranes, 44, 59, 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.06.007
Murillo, 2009, Ground vibration isolation with geofoam barriers: centrifuge modeling, Geotext Geomembranes, 27, 423, 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.03.006
Lyratzakis, 202022, Efficient mitigation of high-speed trains induced vibrations of railway embankments using expanded polystyrene blocks, Transp Geotech
Duškov, 1997, Materials research on EPS20 and EPS15 under representative conditions in pavement structures, Geotext Geomembranes, 15, 147, 10.1016/S0266-1144(97)00011-3
Chun, 2004, Development of a hyperbolic constitutive model for expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam under triaxial compression tests, Geotext Geomembranes, 22, 223, 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2004.03.005
Hazarika, 2006, Stress–strain modeling of EPS geofoam for large-strain applications, Geotext Geomembranes, 24, 79, 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2005.11.003
Meguid, 2019, On the time-dependent behavior of EPS geofoam: experimental and numerical investigations, Geotech Geol Eng, 37, 755, 10.1007/s10706-018-0646-0
Avesani Neto, 2012, Laboratory research on EPS blocks used in geotechnical engineering, Soils Rocks, 35, 169, 10.28927/SR.352169
Beju, 2016, Compression creep test on expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam, Int J Geotech Eng, 10, 401, 10.1080/19386362.2016.1155260
Padade, 2014, Interface strength behavior of expanded polystyrene EPS geofoam, Int J Geotech Eng, 8, 66, 10.1179/1938636213Z.00000000056
Khan, 2018, Experimental investigation of the shear behavior of EPS geofoam, Int J Geosynth Gr Eng, 4
Xenaki, 2001, Experimental investigation of the interaction mechanism at the EPS geofoam-sand interface by direct shear testing, Geosynth Int, 8, 471, 10.1680/gein.8.0204
Ossa, 2011, Dynamic characterization of EPS geofoam, Geotext Geomembranes, 29, 40, 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2010.06.007
Anasthas N. Young’s Modulus by Bending Test and Other Properties of EPS Geofoam Related to Geotechnical Applications. Syracuse University, 2001.
Athanasopoulos, 2011, Experimental investigation of the mechanical behavior of EPS Geofoam under static and dynamic/ cyclic loading, 4th Int. Conf. Geofoam Blocks Constr. Appl.
Athanasopoulos, 1999, Dynamic properties of EPS geofoam: an experimental investigation, Geosynth Int, 6, 171, 10.1680/gein.6.0149
Elragi A, Negussey D, Kyanka G. Sample Size Effects on the Behavior of EPS Geofoam. Soft Gr. Technol., Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2001, p. 280–91. Doi: 10.1061/40552(301)22.
Zou, 2019, Effect of stress history on compressive and rheological behaviors of EPS geofoam, Constr Build Mater, 228, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.318
Zou, 2000, Behaviour of EPS geofoam as flexible pavement subgrade material in model tests, Geosynth Int, 7, 1, 10.1680/gein.7.0163
Negussey D, Huang X. Modulus of Subgrade Reaction for EPS Geofoam. Pavement Mech. Perform., Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2006, p. 165–72. Doi: 10.1061/40866(198)21.
Huang, 2007, Resilient modulus for EPS geofoam, Geotech Spec Publ
Ghotbi Siabil, 2019, Behavior of expanded polystyrene (EPS) blocks under cyclic pavement foundation loading, Geosynth Int, 26, 1, 10.1680/jgein.18.00033
Ghotbi Siabil, 2019, Response of pavement foundations incorporating both geocells and expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam, Geotext Geomembranes
Avesani Neto, 2013, A bearing capacity calculation method for soil reinforced with a geocell, Geosynth Int, 20, 10.1680/gein.13.00007
Avesani Neto, 2015, Evaluation of a calculation method for embankments reinforced with geocells over soft soils using finite-element analysis, Geosynth Int, 1, 10.1680/gein.15.00024
Avesani Neto, 2019, Application of the two-layer system theory to calculate the settlements and vertical stress propagation in soil reinforcement with geocell, Geotext Geomembranes, 47, 32, 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.09.003
Duškov, 1997, Measurements on a flexible pavement structure with an EPS geofoam sub-base, Geotext Geomembranes, 15, 5, 10.1016/S0266-1144(97)00004-6
Srivastava, 2018, Sustainability assessment of EPS-geofoam in road construction: a case study, Int J Sustain Eng
Negussey, 2007, Design parameters for eps geofoam. soils and foundations, SOILS Found, 47, 161, 10.3208/sandf.47.161
Huang X, Negussey D. EPS Geofoam Design Parameters for Pavement Structures. Geo-Frontiers 2011, Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2011, p. 4544–54. Doi: 10.1061/41165(397)465.
ASTM D6817. Standard Specification for Rigid Cellular Polystyrene Geofoam. 2017.
IP-05. Flexible pavement design for medium, medium heavy, heavy, very heavy traffics and bus lanes. 2004.
AASHTO. Guide for Design of Pavement Structures. 1993.
Sanders, 1994
Momoi T, Kokusyo T. Evaluation of bearing properties of eps subgrade. IInternational Symp. PES (Expanded Poly-Styrol) Constr. Method (EPS Tokyo ’96), 1996, p. 94–100.
Beju YZ, Mandal JN. California Bearing Ratio (CBR) Behaviors of EPS Geofoam: Experimental and Numerical Studies. 5th Int. Conf. Geofoam Blocks Constr. Appl., Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019, p. 185–96. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-78981-1_15.
DNER-ME024. Determination of pavement deflections using the benkelman beam. 1994.
AASHTO T 256. Standard Method of Test for Pavement Deflection Measurements. 2016.
IP-09. Flexible pavement rehabilitation design. 2004.
Cai, 2015, Effect of anisotropic base/interlayer on the mechanistic responses of layered pavements, Comput Geotech, 65, 250, 10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.12.014
Vellasco BQ. Critical analysis on the control of pavement construction using Benkelman beam: application to the case of the expansion of Tom Jobim International Airport in Rio de Janeiro. Polytechnic School at University of São Paulo (in Portuguese), 2018.
Fernandes IS, Trichês G. Mechanical behavior evaluation of “in situ” graded gravel layer. II Natl. Semin. Mod. Road Tech. (in Port., 2000.
Mota, 2012, Pavement Mechanics applied to the evaluation of a low volume highway, Paving J, 24, 36
Salviano W, Motta LMG. Constructive control analysis of a section of semi-rigid pavement by deflection. 44th Annu. Paving Meet. (in Port., 2015.
Costa GM, Albuquerque FS, Mendonça AT, Albuquerque TMA. Effect of mechanical characteristics differences of laboratory and field paving materials. 44th Annu. Paving Meet. (in Port., 2015).
Andrade LR, Kuchiishi AK, Bessa IS, Vasconcelos, K., Bernucci LLB, Beja IA, Chaves JM. Mechanical behavior of granular and cement-treated base layers on very heavy traffic road. XXIX Natl. Congr. Res. Teach. Transp. (in Port., 2015.
Yoder, 1975, pp.
US Army Corps of Engineers. Settlement Analysis. DticMil 1990:1–18. Doi: 1110-1-1904.
Faghri M, Sadd MH, Cardin J, Daly P, Park K, Tanaka C, et al. Performance improvement of open-graded asphalt mixes. 2002.
Huang, 2004, Pavement Analysis and Design
Halsted, 2006, Guide to cement-treated base (CTB), Portland Cement Association
Wang, 2014, Structural contribution of open-graded friction course mixes in mechanistic–empirical pavement design, Int J Pavement Eng, 15, 731, 10.1080/10298436.2013.857776
Nikolaides, 2014, Highway Engineering, CRC Press
AASHTO. Mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide : a manual of practice. 2015.
Masada T, Sargand SM, Abdalla B, Figueroa JL. Material properties for implementation of mechanistic-empirical (M-E) pavement design procedures. 2004.
Avesani Neto JO. Characterization of geotechnical behavior of EPS through mechanical and hydraulic tests. M.Sc. thesis, São Carlos School of Engineering at University of São Paulo (in Portuguese), 2008.
Elragi, 2000
O’Brien, 2001, EPS behavior during static and cyclic loading from 0.05% strain to failure, 3rd Int. Conf. EPS Geofoam
Sivathayalan, 2001, Simple shear and bender element testing of geofoam, 3rd Int. Conf. EPS Geofoam
Dorman, 1965, Design curves for flexible pavements based on layered system theory, Highw Res Rec
Monismith, 1975, Permanent deformation characteristics of subgrade soils due to repeated loading, 54th Annu Meet. Transp. Res. Board, Transportation Research Board, 1
Pidwerbesky, 1995, Strain response and performance of subgrades and flexible pavements under various loading conditions, Transp. Res. Rec., Transport Res Board Commiss Sociotechnical Syst Nat Res Coun National Academy of Sciences, 87
Mulungye, 2007, Finite element modelling of flexible pavements on soft soil subgrades, Mater Des, 28, 739, 10.1016/j.matdes.2005.12.006
Khazanovich L, Wang Q (Chuck). MnLayer: High-Performance Layered Elastic Analysis Program. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2007;2037:63–75. Doi: 10.3141/2037-06.
Sheeley M, Negussey D. An Investigation of Geofoam Interface Strength Behavior. Soft Gr. Technol., Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2001, p. 292–303. Doi: 10.1061/40552(301)23.
Chrysikos D, Atmatzidis D, Missirlis E. EPS geofoam surface shear resistance. 8th Int. Conf. Geosynth., 2006, p. 1651–1654.
Negussey D, Elragi A. EPS Geofoam, an Overview. Geofoam Research Center Internal Report AE1-00. Syracuse University, NY; 2000.
Amini ZA. Dynamic Characteristics and Seismic Stability of Expanded Polystyrene Geofoam Embankments. University of Utah; 2014.
