Institutionalized computer workaround practices in a Mediterranean country: an examination of two organizations
Tóm tắt
Information systems research often treats computer workarounds tangentially and as temporary phenomena. This exploratory research embraces anomalous system use in general and computer workarounds in particular by suggesting why the latter can be institutionalized and how they may be manifested in practice. Anomalous use is defined as sociomaterial actions around an IT artifact not consistent with its design or related official rules that nevertheless constitute system enactment in practice. The persistence of computer workarounds might be explained by the tension between top-down pressures from the external environment and bottom-up constraints from day-to-day operational work. These insights are drawn from an up-close study of workarounds in two cases from the Mediterranean region. The workaround practices involve decoupling and loose coupling, effectively creating ‘equilibrium’ between the aforementioned top-down and bottom-up influences. This may be attributed to parity between the influence exercised by external regulatory/accrediting bodies and the constraints of day-to-day work within the focal organization (i.e., work ethos, material constraints, and discretion to decouple). Our results show why some computer workarounds exhibit institutionalized behavior and their antecedent conditions. We also suggest that constituent workaround practices may exist as twin but distinctive behavioral patterns – non-compliance (or partial compliance) with an official rule and partially (or fully) working around designed systems.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Azad B and King N (2008) Enacting computer workarounds within a medication dispensing system. European Journal of Information Systems 17 (3), 264–278.
Boudreau M-C and Robey D (2005) Enacting integrated information technology: a human agency perspective. Organization Science 16 (1), 3–18.
Constantinides P and Barrett M (2006) Large-scale ICT innovation, power, and organizational change: the case of a regional health information network. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 42 (1), 76–90.
DeSanctis G and Poole MS (1994) Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science 5 (2), 121–147.
Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review 14 (4), 532–550.
Evered R and Louis MR (1981) Alternative perspectives in the organizational sciences: ‘inquiry from the inside’ and ‘inquiry from the outside’. Academy of Management Review 6 (3), 385–395.
Ferneley EH and Sobreperez P (2006) Resist, comply or workaround? An examination of different facets of user engagement with information systems. European Journal of Information Systems 15 (4), 345–356.
Gasser L (1986) The integration of computing and routine work. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 4 (3), 205–225.
Gerson EM and Star SL (1986) Analyzing due process in the workplace. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 4 (3), 257–270.
Greenwood R and Hinings CR (1996) Understanding radical organizational change: bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review 21 (4), 1022–1054.
International Finance Corporation (2009) Doing Business in the Arab World 2010. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Washington, DC.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2005) Lebanon: Report on observance of standards and codes-fiscal transparency module.
Klein HK and Myers MD (1999) A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly 23 (1), 67–94.
Kobayashi M, Fussell SR, Xiao Y and Seagull FJ (2005) Work coordination, workflow, and workarounds in a medical context. In CHI ‘05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vander Veer Vrije G and Gale C, Eds) April, ACM, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Koopman P and Hoffman RR (2003) Work-arounds, make-work, and kludges. IEEE Intelligent Systems 18 (6), 70–75.
Kunin CM (1993) Resistance to antimicrobial drugs – a worldwide calamity. Annals of Internal Medicine 118 (7), 557–561.
LaPointe L and Rivard S (2005) A multilevel model of resistance to information technology implementation. MIS Quarterly 29 (3), 461–491.
Lee ASB (1989) A scientific methodology for MIS case studies. MIS Quarterly 13 (1), 33–50.
Leonard-Barton D (1990) A dual methodology for case studies: synergistic use of a longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites. Organization Science 1 (3), 248–266.
Meyer JW and Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology 83 (2), 340–363.
Navarra DD (2010) The architecture of global ICT programs: a case study of e-governance in Jordan. Information Technology for Development 16 (2), 128–140.
Orton JD and Weick KE (1990) Loosely coupled systems: a reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review 15 (2), 203–223.
Patton KA (2002) Role of JCAHO standards and clinical practice guidelines in promoting appropriate antimicrobial use. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy 59 (3), S16–S18.
Scott WR (2008) Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
Selznick P (1949) TVA and the Grass Roots. A Study of Politics and Organization. University of California Press, Berkeley.
Selznick P (1996) Institutionalism ‘Old’ and ‘New’. Administrative Science Quarterly 41 (2), 270–277.
Strauss A and Corbin JM (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage, Newbury Park.
The World Bank (1994) Memorandum of the President: Revenue Enhancement and Technical Assistance Project – LE3770. Lebanon.
Wagner EL and Newell S (2006) Repairing ERP: producing social order to create a working information system. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 42 (1), 40–57.
Yin RKB (2003) Case study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks, California, USA.