Institutional Divergence of Digital Item Bank Management in Bureaucratic Hybridization: An Application of SSM Based Multi-Method

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 35 - Trang 527-553 - 2021
Nur Muhammaditya1, Sudarsono Hardjosoekarto1, One Herwantoko1, Yulia Gita Fany1, Mahari Is Subangun1
1Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

Tóm tắt

This study aims to analyze institutional divergence of Beckert (2010) by measuring the reframing of three constitutive principles of Digital Weberian Bureaucracy (DWB). In contrast to the studies by Gaus et al. (2017), Sofyani et al. (2018), Muellerleile and Robertson (2018), Turner et al. (2019), and Meilani and Hardjosoekarto (2020), this study explores normative and mimetic mechanisms resulting in the mixed pattern of public administration (Traditional Public Administration (TPA), New Public Management (NPM), and Post NPM), focusing on the transformation of Digital Era Governance (DEG). Employing Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) by Reynolds and Holwell (2010), combined with Text Network Analysis (TNA) by Segev (2020) and Social Network Analysis (SNA) by Borgatti et al. (2014), this study shows the micro dynamics of relationships between actors, the meso dynamics of organizations, and the absence of regulations at the macro level, all of which lead to institutional divergence in the form of fully hybrid governance (as proposed by De Waele et al. (2015)) that is also caused by normative and mimetic mechanisms. Complementing the study of DWB, this study suggests that computer literacy and programming languages are essential to be improved by future bureaucrats as social actors to achieve the success of digital transformation.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Al-Kaabi H (2020) Evaluation of the Vocational Training System in Qatar’s Public Sector. Thesis. Cardiff Metropolitan University Beckert J (2010) Institutional isomorphism revisited: convergence and divergence in institutional change. Sociol Theory 28(2):150–166. http://www.jstor.com/stable/25746221. Accessed 04 Aug 2020 Berg LN, Pinheiro R (2016) Handling different institutional logics in the public sector: comparing management in Norwegian universities and hospitals. Res Sociol Organ 45:146–168. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20150000045018 Borgatti SP, Brass DJ, Halgin DS (2014) Social network research: confusions, criticisms, and controversies. Res Sociol Organ 40:1–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X(2014)0000040001 Breit E, Fossestøl K, Andreassen TA (2018) From pure to hybrid professionalism in post-NPM activation reform: the institutional work of frontline managers. J Prof Organ 5(3):28–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/jox013 Brocklesby J (1995) Intervening in the cultural constitution of systems—methodological complementarism and other visions for systems research. J Oper Res Soc 46(11):1285–1298. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1995.178 Checkland P (2000) Soft systems methodology: a thirty year retrospective. Syst Res Behav Sci 17:11–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1743(200011)17:1+<::aid-sres374>3.0.co;2-o Checkland P, Poulter J (2006) Learning for Action: A Short Definitive Account of Soft Systems Methodology and its use for Practitioners. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Teachers and Students Correia T, Denis JL (2016) Hybrid management, organizational configuration, and medical professionalism: evidence from the establishment of a clinical directorate in Portugal. BMC Health Serv Res 16(2). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1398-2 Curtis S (2019) Digital transformation—the silver bullet to public service improvement? Public Money Manag 39(5):322–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1611233 Danowski JA, Riopelle K (2020) Correction to: scaling constructs with semantic networks (quality and quantity, (2019), 53, 5, (2671-2683), 10.1007/s11135-019-00879-5). Qual Quant 54(1):235–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-019-00959-6 De Waele L, Berghman L, Matthyssens P (2015) Defining hybridity and hybrid contingencies in public organizations: an alternative conceptual model. Stud Public Non-Profit Gov 4:113–154. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2051-663020150000004005 Diegel W, Moritz A, Block JH, Botsari A, Lang F, Krämer-Eis H (2020) Measuring Venture Capital Sentiment in Europe. In FGF Studies in Small Business and Entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17612-9_6 DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The Iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev 48(2):147–160. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2095101. Accessed 04 Aug 2020 Donina D, Paleari S (2019) New public management: global reform script or conceptual stretching? Analysis of university governance structures in the Napoleonic administrative tradition. High Educ 78(2):193–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0338-y Dunleavy P, Margetts H, Bastow S, Tinkler J (2006) Public management research association new public management is dead: long live digital-era governance. J Public Admin Res Theory 16(3):467–494. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3840393. Accessed 10 Sep 2020 Dwivedi P, Shankar RT, Meghana B, Sushaini H, Sudeep BR, Pooja MR (2021) Designing an adaptive question Bank and question paper generation management system. Adv Intell Syst Comput 1133:965–973. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3514-7_72 Ediyono (2013) Penyempurnaan Proses Implementasi Evaluasi Diri Sekolah Dalam rangka Penjaminan dan Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan: Sebuah Aplikasi Riset Tindakan Berbasis SSM. Master Thesis. Faculty of Social and Political Sciences. University of Indonesia. http://lontar.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20348762&lokasi=loka Garg S, Norman GJ (2021) Impact of COVID-19 on health economics and Technology of Diabetes Care: use cases of real-time continuous glucose monitoring to transform health care during a global pandemic. Diabetes Technol Ther 23(S1):S15–S20. https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2020.0656 Gaus N, Sultan S, Basri M (2017) State bureaucracy in Indonesia and its reforms: an overview. Int J Public Adm 40(8):658–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1186179 Gebreiter F, Hidayah NN (2019) Individual responses to competing accountability pressures in hybrid organisations: the case of an English business school. Account Audit Account J 32(3):727–749. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2017-3098 Glaser BG, Anselm LS (2017) The discovery of grounded theory strategies for qualitative research. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203793206 Gulbrandsen M (2011) Research institutes as hybrid organizations: central challenges to their legitimacy. Policy Sci 44(3):215–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-011-9128-4 Hadiyanto W (2013) Penyempurnaan Kebijakan Lembaga Penyiaran Publik Televisi Republik Indonesia- TVRI, Aplikasi Riset Tindakan Berbasis SSM. Master Thesis. Faculty of Social and Political Sciences. University of Indonesia. http://lontar.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20348952&lokasi=lokal Hardjosoekarto S (2012) Construction of social development index as a theoretical research practice in action research by using soft systems methodology. Syst Pract Action Res 25(6):493–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-012-9237-9 Hardjosoekarto S, Yovani N, Santiar L (2013) Institutional strengthening for the role of mass Media in Disaster Risk Reduction in Japan and Indonesia: an application of SSM-based action research. Syst Pract Action Res 27(3):227–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-013-9282-z Heeks R (2002) iGovernment: working paper series. In eGovernment in Africa: promise and practice (no. 13). University of Manchester, precinct Centre. http://idpm.man.ac.uk/wp/igov/index.htm. Accessed 20 Oct 2020 Hildebrandt SA, Eom M (2011) Teacher professionalization: motivational factors and the influence of age. Teach Teach Educ 27(2):416–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.09.011 Kareborn (2004) Basic principles of SSM modeling: an examination of CATWOE from a soft perspective. Problemy Peredachi Informatsii 40(2):50–62. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SPAA.0000018903.18767.18 Khodachek I, Timoshenko K (2018) Russian central government budgeting and public sector reform discourses: paradigms, hybrids, and a “Third Way”. Int J Public Adm 41(5–6):460–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1383417 Kotiadis K, Tako AA, Rouwette EAJA, Vasilakis C, Brennan J, Gandhi P, Wegstapel H, Sagias F, Webb P (2013) Using a model of the performance measures in soft systems methodology (SSM) to take action: a case study in health care. J Oper Res Soc 64(1):125–137. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2012.21 Kusumastuti R (2013) Membangun Keunggulan Bersaing Melalui Dual Ambidexterity: Aplikasi Multi Metodologi Cognitive Map dan SSM kontinum Dual Imperatives. Doctoral Dissertation. Faculty of Social and Political Sciences. University of Indonesia. http://lontar.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20350869&lokasi=lokal Larrán M, Herrera J, Andrades FJ (2015) Measuring the linkage between strategies on sustainability and institutional forces: an empirical study of Spanish universities. J Environ Plan Manag 59(6):967–992. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2015.1050485 Margetts H, Dunleavy P (2013) The second wave of digital-era governance: a quasi-paradigm for government on the web. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 371(1987):20120382. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0382 Matsuoka R, Akazawa H, Kodera S, Komuro I (2020) The dawning of the digital era in the management of hypertension. Hypertens Res 43(11):1135–1140. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-020-0506-1 Mehra A, Kilduff M, Brass DJ (2001) The social networks of high and low self-monitors: implications for workplace performance. Adm Sci Q 46(1):121–146. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667127 Meilani NL, Hardjosoekarto S (2020) Digital weberianism bureaucracy: alertness and disaster risk reduction (DRR) related to the Sunda Strait volcanic tsunami. Int J Disaster Risk Reduction 51:101898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101898 Mingers J (2001) Combining IS research methods: towards a pluralist methodology. Inf Syst Res 12(3):240–259. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.12.3.240.9709 Möllers N (2021) Making digital territory: cybersecurity, techno-nationalism, and the moral boundaries of the state. Sci Technol Hum Values 46(1):112–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243920904436 Muellerleile C, Robertson SL (2018) Digital Weberianism: bureaucracy, information, and the techno-rationality of neoliberal capitalism. Indiana J Global Legal Stud 25(1):187. https://doi.org/10.2979/indjglolegstu.25.1.0187 Muliawaty L, Alamsyah K, Salamah U, Maylawati DS (2019) The concept of big data in bureaucratic service using sentiment analysis. Int J Sociotechnol Knowl Dev 11(3):1–13. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSKD.2019070101 Muluk MRK, Danar OR, Rahmawati L (2019) Community participation and development planning in local government level: a study on the formulation of Batu City medium-term development plan. BISNIS & BIROKRASI: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Organisasi 26(3):1. https://doi.org/10.20476/jbb.v26i3.11145 OECD (2018) PISA 2018 released financial literacy items. August, 1–27. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/test/ Pakpahan R (2016) Computer based national exam model: its benefits and barriers. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan 1(1):19–35. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/124980-none-a7dd8e51.pdf. Accessed 25 Apr 2021 Permatasari YI, Hardjosoekarto S, Salomo RV (2019) Institutional transformation of public private partnership to ensure low transaction costs: case study of infrastructure provision at the Ministry of Public Works and Housing of the Republic of Indonesia. Syst Pract Action Res 33(2):149–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-019-09485-w Pinora JA (2014) Implementasi SSM dalam Perkembangan Penyelidikan Intelijen Guna Menghadapi Ancaman Jaringan Terorisme di Indonesia. Master Thesis. Faculty of Social and Political Sciences. University of Indonesia. http://lontar.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20414093&lokasi=lokal Pollack J (2007) The changing paradigms of project management. Int J Proj Manag 25(3):266–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.08.002 Reynolds M, Holwell S (2010) Systems approaches to managing change: a practical guide. In Systems Approaches to Managing Change: A Practical Guide. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-809-4 Rogiers P, Viaene S, Leysen J (2020) The digital future of internal staffing: a vision for transformational electronic human resource management. Intell Syst Account Financ Manag 27(4):182–196. https://doi.org/10.1002/isaf.1481 Sari AM, Hidayanto AN, Purwandari B, Budi NFA, Kosandi M (2018) Challenges and issues of E-participation implementation: a case study of e-complaint Indonesia. Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on informatics and computing, ICIC 2018, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/IAC.2018.8780467 Segev E (2020) Textual network analysis: detecting prevailing themes and biases in international news and social media. Sociol Compass 14(4):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12779 Simonet D (2015) Post-NPM reforms or administrative hybridization in the French health care system? Int J Public Adm 38(9):672–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.955195 Sofyani H, Akbar R, Ferrer RC (2018) 20 years of performance measurement system (PMS) implementation in indonesian local governments: why is their performance still poor? Asian J Bus Account 11(1):151–184. https://doi.org/10.22452/ajba.vol11no1.6 Stephens J, Barton J, Haslett T (2009) Action research: its history and relationship to scientific methodology. Syst Pract Action Res 22(6):463–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-009-9147-7 Sulistiyani E, Susanto TD (2018) Change management methodology for e-government project in developing countries: a conceptual model. Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on informatics and computing, ICIC 2018, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/IAC.2018.8780500 Surjana O, Siswoyo M, Dedy ASK (2020) Bureaucratic reform and empowerment of state civil apparatus in the face of the industrial revolution 4.0 (pp. 2608–2611). https://doi.org/10.5373/JARDCS/V12I2/S20201310 Tian X, Christensen T (2020) Ambiguous hybridity? Main features of China’s service-oriented government reform. Int J Public Sect Manag 33(4):419–433. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-09-2019-0241 Tsoi HL (2004) Logical soft systems methodology for education Programme development. Issues Inf Sci Inf Technol 1:1027–1035. https://doi.org/10.28945/796 Turner M, Prasojo E, Sumarwono R (2019) The challenge of reforming big bureaucracy in Indonesia. Policy Stud 0(0): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2019.1708301 Ugyel L (2014) Explaining hybridity in public administration: an empirical case of bhutan’s civil service. Public Adm Dev 34(2):109–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1685 Van der Aalst WMP (2007) Exploring the CSCW spectrum using process mining. Adv Eng Inform 21(2):191–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2006.05.002 Weber M (1978) Economy and society: an outline of interpretive sociology. Sociology 3(3):448–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/003803856900300342 Wilopo (2013) Pembaruan Kelembagaan dan Tata Kelola dalam Rangka Perbaikan Pelayanan ICT USO. Doctoral Dissertation. Faculty of Social and Political Sciences. University of Indonesia. http://lontar.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20364578&lokasi=lokal Wilson B (2010) Soft systems methodology for conceptual modeling. In Conceptual Modeling for Discrete-Event Simulation. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439810385-p3 Xiaolong T, Christensen T (2019) Beyond NPM to post-NPM? A study of China’s government reforms over the past 40 years. Am Rev Public Adm 49(7):855–865. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074019849122 Xu S, Du W, Wang C, Liu D (2017) The library big data research: status and directions. Int J Softw Innov 5(3):77–88. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSI.2017070106 Yıldızcan C, Bayraktar U (2019) The empowerment of Turkish governors within hybrid settings of public administration. Mediterr Polit 24(3):356–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2017.1398889 Yovani N (2013) Transfer Teknologi sebagai Konstruksi Sosial: Sebuah Tesis awal yang diperoleh dari Perusahaan Afiliasi Jepang dan Perusahaan Lokal Komponen Otomotif dengan menggunakan SSM. Doctoral Dissertation. Faculty of Social and Political Sciences. University of Indonesia. http://lontar.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20329026&lokasi=lokal