Initial Experience and Evaluation of a Nomogram for Outcome Prediction in Management of Medium-sized (1–2 cm) Kidney Stones

European Urology Focus - Tập 8 - Trang 276-282 - 2022
Salvatore Micali1, Maria Chiara Sighinolfi1, Andrea Iseppi1, Elena Morini1, Tommaso Calcagnile1, Mattia Benedetti1, Marco Ticonosco1, Shaniko Kaleci2, Luigi Bevilacqua1, Stefano Puliatti1, Cosimo De Nunzio3, Raphael Arada4, Francesco Chiancone5, Davide Campobasso6, Ahmed Eissa7, Giulia Bonfante1, Elisa Simonetti8, Michele Cotugno9, Riccardo Galli10, Pierpaolo Curti11
1Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Urological Residency School Network, University of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
2Clinical and experimental medicine (CEM), Department of Surgical, Medical, Dental and Morphological Sciences with Interest in Transplant, Oncology and Regenerative Medicine, University of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
3Department of Urology, Ospedale Sant’Andrea, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
4Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, USA
5Department of Urology, AORN Antonio Cardarelli, Naples, Italy
6Department of Urology, Ospedale Civile di Guastalla, Urological Residency School Network, University of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Guastalla, Italy
7Department of Urology, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
8Department of Urology, Ospedale Maggiore, Urological Residency School Network, University of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Parma, Italy
9Department of Urology, Ospedale di Vaio, Urological Residency School Network, University of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Fidenza, Italy
10Department of Urology, Policlinico San Pietro, Ponte San Pietro, Italy
11Department of Urology, Ospedale Mater Salutis, Legnago, Italy

Tài liệu tham khảo

Alivizatos, 2006, Is there still a role for open surgery in the management of renal stones?, Curr Opin Urol, 16, 106, 10.1097/01.mou.0000193379.08857.e7 Micali, 2009, Laparoscopic simultaneous treatment of peripelvic renal cysts and stones: case series, J Endourol, 23, 1851, 10.1089/end.2009.0042 Bove, 2009, Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: a comparison between the transperitoneal and the retroperitoneal approach during the learning curve, J Endourol, 23, 953, 10.1089/end.2008.0055 EAU guidelines, 2020 Rosa, 2013, Recent finding and new technologies in nephrolithiasis: a review of the recent literature, BMC Urol, 13, 10, 10.1186/1471-2490-13-10 Micali, 2009, Dornier Lithotripter S 220 F EMSE: the first report of over 1000 treatments, Urology, 74, 1211, 10.1016/j.urology.2009.05.101 Sighinolfi, 2008, Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in an elderly population: how to prevent complications and make the treatment safe and effective, J Endourol, 22, 2223, 10.1089/end.2008.9704 Pearle, 2005, Prospective, randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less, J Urol, 179, S69 Donaldson, 2015, Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones, Eur Urol, 67, 612, 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.054 Desai, 2017, Miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a decade of paradigm shift in percutaneous renal access, Eur Urol, 72, 236, 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.02.028 De La Rosette, 2012, Categorisation of complications and validation of the Clavien score for percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Eur Urol, 62, 246, 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.055 Resorlu, 2013, Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery, shockwave lithotripsy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of medium-sized radiolucent renal stones, World J Urol, 31, 1581, 10.1007/s00345-012-0991-1 Okhunov, 2013, S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry: Novel surgical classification system for kidney calculi, Urology, 81, 1154, 10.1016/j.urology.2012.10.083 Hosmer, 2000 Zlotnik, 2015, A general-purpose nomogram generator for predictive logistic regression models, Stata J, 15, 537, 10.1177/1536867X1501500212 Steyerberg, 2009 Thomas, 2011, The Guy’s stone score grading the complexity of percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures, Urology, 78, 277, 10.1016/j.urology.2010.12.026 Smith, 2013, A nephrolithometric nomogram to predict treatment success of percutaneous nephrolithotomy, J Urol, 190, 149, 10.1016/j.juro.2013.01.047 Jeong, 2013, Seoul National University renal stone complexity score for predicting stone-free rate after percutaneous nephrolithotomy, PLoS One, 8, 10.1371/journal.pone.0065888 Resorlu, 2012, A new scoring system for predicting stone-free rate after retrograde intrarenal surgery: the “resorlu-Unsal Stone Score.”, Urology, 80, 512, 10.1016/j.urology.2012.02.072 Sfoungaristos, 2016, External validation of Resorlu–Unsal stone score as predictor of outcomes after retrograde intrarenal surgery, Int Urol Nephrol, 48, 1247, 10.1007/s11255-016-1311-2 Tran, 2015, Triple D score is a reportable predictor of shockwave lithotripsy stone-free rates, J Endourol, 29, 226, 10.1089/end.2014.0212 Bagrodia, 2008, Impact of body mass index on cost and clinical outcomes after percutaneous nephrostolithotomy, Urology, 72, 756, 10.1016/j.urology.2008.06.054 Patel, 2009, Skin to stone distance is an independent predictor of stone-free status following shockwave lithotripsy, J Endourol, 23, 1383, 10.1089/end.2009.0394 Kim, 2016, Clinical nomograms to predict stone-free rates after shock-wave lithotripsy: development and internal-validation, PLoS One, 11 Akman, 2011, Variables that influence operative time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an analysis of 1897 cases, J Endourol, 25, 1269, 10.1089/end.2011.0061 Giusti, 2007, Miniperc? No, thank you!, Eur Urol, 51, 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.07.047 De, 2015, Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Eur Urol, 67, 125, 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.003 Wiesenthal, 2011, A comparison of treatment modalities for renal calculi between 100 and 300 mm2: are shockwave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy equivalent?, J Endourol, 25, 481, 10.1089/end.2010.0208 Merigot De Treigny, 2015, The cumulated stone diameter: a limited tool for stone burden estimation, Urology, 86, 477, 10.1016/j.urology.2015.06.018