Inheritance of resistance to carboxylic acid amide (CAA) fungicides in Plasmopara viticola

Plant Pathology - Tập 56 Số 2 - Trang 199-208 - 2007
U. Gisi1,2, Maya Waldner1,2, N. Kraus2, Pierre-Henri Dubuis1,2, Helge Sierotzki2
1Institute of Botany, University of Basel, CH‐4056 Basel, Switzerland
2Syngenta Crop Protection, Research Biology, WST‐540, CH‐4332 Stein; and

Tóm tắt

Mandipropamid is a new mandelic acid amide fungicide expressing high activity against foliar infecting oomycetes, including the grapevine downy mildew, Plasmopara viticola. Because cross‐resistance with the valinamide fungicides iprovalicarb and benthiavalicarb and the cinnamic acid amide fungicides dimethomorph and flumorph was postulated, all five compounds are classified as carboxylic acid amide (CAA) fungicides. To support this classification, cross‐resistance among these compounds with field isolates and the segregation of resistance in F1 and F2 progeny of P. viticola were evaluated. A bimodal distribution of sensitivity in field isolates and cross‐resistance among all CAAs for the vast majority of isolates were detected. Crosses between sensitive (s) and CAA‐resistant (r) isolates of opposite mating types, P1 and P2, yielded abundant oospores. All F1‐progeny isolates were sensitive to CAAs (s:r segregation 1:0), whereas in F2 progeny segregation of about 9:1 (s:r) was observed suggesting that resistance to CAA fungicides is controlled by two recessive nuclear genes. Mating type segregated in a ratio P1:P2 of c. 2:1 in F1 and 1:1 in F2 progeny. In the same crosses, resistance to the phenylamide fungicide mefenoxam segregated in a ratio of c. 1:3:2 (sensitive:intermediate:resistant), reflecting the monogenic, semidominant nature of resistance. The risk of resistance in P. viticola was classified as high for phenylamide and moderate for CAA fungicides. This is the first report on the inheritance of phenotypic traits in P. viticola.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Albert G, 1996, Modern Fungicides and Antifungal Compounds, 141

Albert G, 1991, The 3rd International Conference on Plant Diseases, 887

Brent KJ, 1998, Fungicide Resistance: the Assessment of Risk

Chabane K, 1996, Modern Fungicides and Antifungal Compounds., 387

10.1094/Phyto-85-1500

Emmett RW, 1992, Plant Diseases of International Importance. Vol II: Diseases of Fruit Crops., 90

10.1094/PHYTO.1997.87.10.1034

Felsenstein J, 1995, PHYLIP: Phylogeny Inference Package

FRAC 2005.CAA Working Group Report.http://www.frac.info.com.

10.1007/0-306-47914-1_4

10.1146/annurev.phyto.34.1.549

Gisi U, 1988, Brighton Crop Protection Conference‐Pests and Diseases., 359

10.1023/A:1022565405974

HuggenbergerF LamberthC IwanzikW 2005.Mandipropamid a new fungicide against oomycete pathogens. In:Proceedings of the BCPC International Congress Glasgow UK 2005.87–92.

Judelson HS, 1995, Genetic mapping and non‐Mendelian segregation of mating type loci in the oomycete, Phytophthora infestans. Genetics, 141, 503

10.1046/j.1365-3059.2002.00762.x

Miyake Y, 2003, Brighton Crop Protection Conference‐Pests and Diseases., 105

10.1094/PD-90-0741

10.1094/PHYTO-96-0501

10.1111/j.1439-0434.2006.01136.x

Stenzel K, 1998, Brighton Crop Protection Conference Conference‐Pests and Diseases., 367

10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01462.x

10.1046/j.1365-3059.2001.00573.x

Young DH, 2005, Modern Fungicides and Antifungal Compounds IV, 145