Information systems management and strategy formulation: the ‘stages of growth’ model revisited

Information Systems Journal - Tập 1 Số 2 - Trang 89-114 - 1991
Robert D. Galliers1, Alison Sutherland1
1Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, England, and Corporate Systems Planning Pty Ltd, Perth, Australia

Tóm tắt

Abstract. The original ‘stages of growth’ model, as applied to the field of Information Systems (Gibson & Nolan, 1974), may be viewed as seminal, given the influence it has had on both theory and practice (Nolan, 1984; Sullivan, 1985; Ward, et al., 1990). This is so, despite the model's lack of substantiation based on empirical evidence, the overly simplistic assumptions on which it is based, and the limited focus of the original concept (Benbasat, et al., 1984; King & Kraemer, 1984).Since its first appearance, the model has been refined following many applications (Nolan, 1979, 1984). In addition, others have developed ‘stages of growth’ models of their own. For example, Somogyi & Galliers, (1987a, b)provide a model depicting the move from basic data processing systems to strategic information systems, tracing the early days of commercial applications of computing through to the present day (Ward et al. 1990). Earl (1983, 1986, 1988, 1989) proposes a stages‐model for information systems planning, as does Bhabuta (1988), while Hirschheim, et al. (1988) have developed a more broadly focused model associated with the development of the information‐systems management function.As a result of a review of the above and of a case study research undertaken in Perth, Western Australia, a revised model was developed, which takes account of current thinking and past experience in the application of the various ‘stages of growth’ models (Sutherland & Galliers, 1989).This paper sets out to review some of these models and proceeds to describe the process of developing, testing and applying the revised ‘stages of growth’ model. The model is more broadly focused than the original concept, incorporating strategic, organizational, human resource and management considerations. As a result, it is argued that this model has greater utility than its predecessors.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Ackoff R. L., 1981, Creating the Corporate Future

British Computer Society (1990)From Potential to Reality: ‘Hybrids’ ‐ A Critical Force in the Application of Information Technology in the 1990s.A Report by the British Computer Society Task Group on Hybrids 2 January.

10.1145/358189.358076

Bhabuta L.(1988)Sustaining productivity and competitiveness by marshalling IT. In:Proceedings: Information Technology Management for Productivity and Strategic Advantage IFIP TC‐8 Open Conference Singapore March.

Cash J. I., 1985, IS Redraws competitive boundaries, Harvard Business Review, 63, 134

Earl M. J., 1983, The Management lmplications of New Information Technology

Earl M. J., 1986, Critical lssues in Information Systems Research

Earl M. J., 1988, Information Management: The Strategic Dimension

Earl M. J., 1989, Management Strategies for Information Technology

Edwards B. Earl M.&Feeny D.(1989)Any way out of the labyrinth of managing IS? RDP89/3 Oxford Institute of Information Management Research and Discussion Paper Templeton College Oxford University.

Galliers R. D., 1987, Oxford Surveys in Information Technology, 223

Galliers R. D., 1987, Information Analysis: Selected Readings

Galliers R. D., 1990, Problems and answers of the IT skills shortage, The Computer Bulletin, 2

10.1057/ejis.1991.7

Galliers R. D., 1991, Warwick Business School Working Paper

Gibson C., 1974, Managing the four stages of EDP growth, Harvard Business Review, 52

Gluck F. W., 1980, Strategic management for competitive advantage, Harvard Business Review, 58, 7

Greiner L. E., 1972, Evolution and revolution as organisations grow, Harvard Business Review, 50, 7

Hamilton S., 1982, Knowledge utilisation among MIS researchers, MIS Quarterly, 6, 13

Hirschheim R. Earl M. Feeny D.&Lockett M.(1988)An exploration into the management of the information systems function: key issues and an evolutionary model.Proceedings: Information Technology Management for Productivity and Strategic Advantage IFIP TC‐8 Open Conference Singapore March.

10.1145/358189.358074

Land F. F., 1982, Infomation Analysis: selected readings, 203

McFarlan F. W., 1982, The Information archipeligo: gaps and bridges, Harvard Business Review, 60, 8

McFarlan F. W., 1983, The information archipeligo: plotting a course, Harvard Business Review, 61, 1

Nolan R., 1979, Managing the crises in data processing, Harvard Business Review, 57, 8

Nolan R., 1984, The Information Systems Research Challenge, 195

Oliver I., 1984, Information Analysis: selected readings, 113

10.1016/0007-6813(81)90032-X

Sobkowich R.(1985)When the company picks a CIO will you be IT.Computerworld June 24.

10.1057/jit.1987.7

Somogyi E. K., 1987, Towards Strategic Infomation Systems

Sullivan C. H.(1985)Systems planning in the information age.Sloan Management Review Winter.

Sutherland A. R.&Galliers R. D.(1989)An evolutionary model to assist in the planning of strategic information systems and the management of the information systems function.School of Information Systems Working Paper Curtin University of Technology Perth Western Australia February.

Ward J., 1990, Strategic Planning for Information Systems

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Information Systems Journal

Tập 1 Số 2

89-114

Thông tin tác giả