Information asymmetry in fire insurance: a frontier approach
Tóm tắt
The composed error stochastic frontier model is used to separate random variations in fire insurance losses from systematic unexpected losses due to adverse selection or moral hazard. Net premiums are an ex-ante predictor of losses, based on information available to insurers. Losses due to information unknown to the insurer are picked up by the half-normal part of the error term. Loss data for 275 stock fire companies operating in 51 states and territories in 1917 are analyzed in a random effects panel data model. The mean cost per insurer of adverse selection and moral hazard amounts to 15% of fire losses. This is an upper bound estimate because some portion of this cost may be due to failure to operate efficiently rather than incomplete information.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Coelli TJ, Rao DS, O’Donnell, Battese GE (2005) An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
Cohen A, Siegelman P (2010) Testing for adverse selection in insurance markets. J Risk Insur 77(1):39–84
Cummins JD and J Vanderhei, 1992, A note on the relative efficiency of property-liability insurance distribution systems. Reprinted In Foundations of Insurance Economics, Dionne, G and S.E. Harrington (eds.), 521-531. Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publishers
Goble GW (1937) The moral Hazard clauses of the standard fire insurance policy. Columbia Law Rev 37:410–428
Greene WH (2002) “Fixed and random effects in stochastic frontier models,” Working Paper: Stern School of Business, New York University
Greene WH (2007) Limdep Version 9, An Econometric Modeling Guide. Econometric Software, Inc., Plainview
Greene WH (2008) The econometric approach to efficiency analysis. In: Fried H, Lovell K, Schmidt S (eds) The Measurement of Productive Efficiency and Productivity Growth. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 92–250
Hasofer AM, Thomas IR (2003) Probability distributions of fire losses’, Proceedings of the International Symposium for Fire Safety Science, 7th, 2002: Worcester: Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 1063-1072
Insurance Society of New York (1922) The fire insurance contract: its history and interpretation. The Rough Notes Co., Minneapolis
Jondrow JK, Lovell K, Materov I, Schmidt P (1982) On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production model. J Econ 19:233–238
Joskow PL (1992) Cartels, competition and regulation in the property-liability insurance industry. In: Dionne G, Harrington SE (eds) Foundations of insurance economics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, pp 468–520
Kumbhakar SC, Lovell CAK (2000) Stochastic frontier analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York
Pitt M, Lee L (1981) The measurement and sources of technical inefficiency in the Indonesian weaving industry. J Dev Econ 9:43–64
Rothschild M, Stiglitz J (1976) Equilibrium in competitive insurance markets. Q J Econ 90(4):629–649
Siegelman P (2004) Adverse selection in insurance markets: an exaggerated threat. Yale Law J 113(6):1223–1281
Spectator Co (1918a) Distribution by states of fire insurance in 1917. The Spectator Company, New York
Spectator Co (1918b) Fire Insurance Laws, Taxes and Fees. The Spectator Company, New York
Spectator Insurance Yearbook (1917) 1918, Volume 46 (2), Fire and Marine, New York: The Spectator Co.