Information and visual attention in contingent valuation and choice modeling: field and eye-tracking experiments applied to reforestations in Spain

Adamowicz, 1998, Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: choice experiments and contingent valuation, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 80, 65, 10.2307/3180269 Akaichi, 2013, Are results from non-hypothetical choice-based conjoint analyses and non-hypothetical recoded-ranking conjoint analyses similar?, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 95, 949, 10.1093/ajae/aat013 Alberini, 1995, Optimal design for discrete choice contingent valuation surveys: single-bound, double-bound and bivariate models, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 28, 287, 10.1006/jeem.1995.1019 Alevy, 2011, How can behavioral economics inform nonmarket valuation? An example from the preference reversal literature, Land Econ., 87, 365, 10.3368/le.87.3.365 Balcombe, 2014, Visual attention and attribute attendance in multi-attribute choice experiments, J. Appl. Econ. Bazerman, 1999, Explaining how preferences change across joint versus separate evaluation, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 39, 41, 10.1016/S0167-2681(99)00025-6 Boxall, 1996, A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation, Ecol. Econ., 18, 243, 10.1016/0921-8009(96)00039-0 Cameron, 2010, Differential attention to attributes in utility-theoretic choice models, J Choice Model., 3, 73, 10.1016/S1755-5345(13)70015-0 Cameron, 2002, Alternative non-market value-elicitation methods: are the underlying preferences the same?, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 34, 391, 10.1006/jeem.2001.1210 Caparrós, 2008, Would you choose your preferred option? Comparing choice and recoded ranking experiments, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 90, 843, 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01137.x Caparrós, 2010, Carbon sequestration with reforestations and biodiversity-scenic values, Environ. Res. Econ., 45, 49, 10.1007/s10640-009-9305-5 Caplin, 2011, Search and satisficing, Am. Econ. Rev., 101, 2899, 10.1257/aer.101.7.2899 Christie, 2009, Testing the consistency between standard contingent valuation, repeated contingent valuation and choice experiments, J. Agric. Econ., 60, 154, 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2008.00178.x Christie, 2007, Valuing enhancements to forest recreation using choice experiment and contingent behaviour methods, J. For. Econ., 13, 75, 10.1016/j.jfe.2007.02.005 Efron, 1993 Foster, 2003, Elicitation format and sensitive to scope: do contingent valuation and choice experiments give the same results?, Environ. Res. Econ., 24, 141, 10.1023/A:1022856329552 Halvorsen, 2000, Comparing ranking and contingent valuation for valuing human lives, applying nested and non-nested logit models, Environ. Res. Econ., 17, 1, 10.1023/A:1008336406885 Hanley, 1998, Using choice experiments to value the environment. Design issues, current experience and future prospects, Environ. Res. Econ., 11, 413, 10.1023/A:1008287310583 Hanley, 1998, Contingent valuation versus choice experiments: estimating the benefits of environmentally sensitive areas in Scotland, J. Agric. Econ., 49, 1, 10.1111/j.1477-9552.1998.tb01248.x Hensher, 2006, How do respondents process stated choice experiments? Attribute consideration under varying information load, J. Appl. Econ., 21, 861, 10.1002/jae.877 Hoehn, 2010, Stated choice experiments with complex ecosystem changes: The effect of information formats on estimated variances and choice parameters, J. Agric. Res. Econ., 35, 568 Johnson, 1997, Estimating stated preferences with rated-paired data: environmental, health and employment effects of energy programs, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 34, 79, 10.1006/jeem.1997.1002 Krajbich, 2010, Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice, Nat. Neurosci., 13, 1292, 10.1038/nn.2635 Koenpfle, 2009, Studying learning in games using eye-tracking, J. Eur. Econ. Assoc., 72, 388 Krawczyk, 2012, Testing for hypothetical bias in willingness to support a reforestation program, J. For. Econ., 18, 282, 10.1016/j.jfe.2012.07.003 Krinsky, 1986, On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities, Rev. Econ. Stat., 68, 715, 10.2307/1924536 Lindhjem, 2012, Forest owners’ willingness to accept compensation for voluntary conservation: a contingent valuation approach, J. For. Econ., 18, 290, 10.1016/j.jfe.2012.06.004 Magat, 1988, Paired comparison and contingent valuation approaches to morbidity risk valuation, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 15, 395, 10.1016/0095-0696(88)90034-4 McFadden, 1973, Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour, 105 Mogas, 2006, A comparison of contingent valuation and choice modeling with second-order interactions, J. For. Econ., 12, 5, 10.1016/j.jfe.2005.11.001 Orquin, 2013, Attention and choice: a review on eye movements in decision making, Acta Psychol., 144, 190, 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.06.003 Ovando, 2010, Landowner net benefit from Stone pine (Pinus pinea L.) afforestation of dry-land cereal fields in Valladolid, Spain, J. For. Econ., 16, 83, 10.1016/j.jfe.2009.07.001 Oviedo, 2014, 56 pp Poe, 2005, Computational methods for measuring the difference of empirical distributions, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 87, 353, 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00727.x Ready, 1995, Contingent valuation when respondents are ambivalent, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 29, 181, 10.1006/jeem.1995.1040 Santos, 2006, Evaluating the benefits of CAP reforms: can afforestations restore bird diversity in Mediterranean Spain?, Basic Appl. Ecol., 7, 483, 10.1016/j.baae.2005.11.001 Scarpa, 2006, Distribution of Willingness-to-pay for Speed Reduction with Non-positive Bidders: is choice modeling consistent with contingent valuation, Transp. Rev., 26, 451, 10.1080/01441640600602252 Siikamäki, 2007, Discrete choice survey experiments: a comparison using flexible methods, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 53, 122, 10.1016/j.jeem.2006.04.003 Stevens, 1997, Conjoint analysis of groundwater protection programs, Agric. Res. Econ. Rev., 26, 229, 10.1017/S1068280500002690 Stevens, 2000, Comparison of contingent valuation and conjoint analysis in ecosystem management, Ecol. Econ., 32, 63, 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00071-3 Swait, 1993, The role of the scale parameter in the estimation and comparison of multinomial logit models, J. Mark. Res., 30, 305, 10.2307/3172883 Tanida, 2010, Testing social preferences through differential attention to own and partner's payoff in a Prisoner's Dilemma Game, Lett. Evol. Behav. Sci., 1, 31, 10.5178/lebs.2010.8 Train, 2009 Varela, 2014, Testing the single opt-out reminder in choice experiments: An application to fuel-break management in Spain, J. For. Econ., 20, 212, 10.1016/j.jfe.2014.05.001 Wedel, 2007, A review of eye-tracking research in marketing, Rev. Mark. Res., 4, 123, 10.1108/S1548-6435(2008)0000004009 Yang, 2015, A bounded rationality model of information search and choice in preference measurement, J. Mark. Res., 52, 166, 10.1509/jmr.13.0288