Influence of dual-mobility acetabular implants on revision and survivorship of cup and Kerboull-type reinforcement ring constructs in aseptic acetabular loosening
Tài liệu tham khảo
Kerboull, 2000, The Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device in major acetabular reconstructions, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 378, 155, 10.1097/00003086-200009000-00025
Wegrzyn, 2014, Acetabular reconstruction using a kerboull cross-plate, structural allograft and cemented dual-mobility cup in revision THA at a minimum 5-year follow-up, J Arthroplasty, 29, 432, 10.1016/j.arth.2013.05.030
Gibon, 2018, Revision total hip arthroplasty using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device for Paprosky type III defects involving the inferior margin of the acetabulum: a minimum five-year follow-up study, Bone Joint J, 100–B, 725, 10.1302/0301-620X.100B6.BJJ-2017-1472.R1
Okano, 2010, Revision with impacted bone allografts and the Kerboull cross plate for massive bone defect of the acetabulum, J Arthroplasty, 25, 594, 10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.003
Hamadouche, 2010, The use of a cemented dual mobility socket to treat recurrent dislocation, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 468, 3248, 10.1007/s11999-010-1404-7
Schneider, 2011, Revision total hip arthroplasty using a reconstruction cage device and a cemented dual mobility cup, Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 97, 807, 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.09.010
Langlais, 2008, Dual mobility cemented cups have low dislocation rates in THA revisions, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 466, 389, 10.1007/s11999-007-0047-9
Guyen, 2009, Use of a dual mobility socket to manage total hip arthroplasty instability, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 467, 465, 10.1007/s11999-008-0476-0
Reina, 2019, Dual-mobility constructs in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of comparative studies, J Arthroplasty, 34, 594, 10.1016/j.arth.2018.11.020
Assi, 2019, Revision total hip arthroplasty with a Kerboull plate: comparative outcomes using standard versus dual mobility cups, Int Orthop SICOT, 43, 2245, 10.1007/s00264-018-4209-z
Stevenson, 2020, Instability following all-cause acetabular-only revision total hip arthroplasty remains a clinical problem, J Arthroplasty, 10.1016/j.arth.2020.06.011
D’Antonio, 1989, Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 126
Aulakh, 2009, Long-term clinical outcomes following the use of synthetic hydroxyapatite and bone graft in impaction in revision hip arthroplasty, Biomaterials, 30, 1732, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.035
Lebeau, 2017, Total hip arthroplasty revision by dual-mobility acetabular cup cemented in a metal reinforcement: a 62 case series at a minimum 5 years’ follow-up, Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 103, 679, 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.04.009
Massin, 1989, Evaluation of cementless acetabular component migration. An experimental study, J Arthroplasty, 4, 245, 10.1016/S0883-5403(89)80020-8
Nunn, 1989, The measurement of migration of the acetabular component of hip prostheses, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 71, 629, 10.1302/0301-620X.71B4.2768311
DeLee, 1976, Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 20
Harris, 1969, Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 51, 737, 10.2106/00004623-196951040-00012
D’aubigne, 1954, Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 36–A, 451, 10.2106/00004623-195436030-00001
Parker, 1993, A new mobility score for predicting mortality after hip fracture, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 75, 797, 10.1302/0301-620X.75B5.8376443
Kaplan, 1958, Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations, J Am Stat Assoc, 53, 457, 10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452
Erivan, 2019, Progression and projection for hip surgery in France, 2008–2070: epidemiologic study with trend and projection analysis, Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 105, 1227, 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.07.021
Chen, 2014, Component selection in revision total hip arthroplasty, Orthop Clin N Am, 45, 275, 10.1016/j.ocl.2014.03.001
Wegrzyn, 2013, Cementation of a dual-mobility acetabular component into a well-fixed metal shell during revision total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical validation, J Orthop Res, 31, 991, 10.1002/jor.22314
Kamada, 2018, Acetabular reconstruction with the Kerboull-type plate at mid-term follow-up: survivorship analysis and prognostic factors for loosening, Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 28, 485, 10.1007/s00590-017-2060-3
Sayac, 2020, Low revision rates at more than 10 years for dual-mobility cups cemented into cages in complex revision total hip arthroplasty, J Arthroplasty, 35, 513, 10.1016/j.arth.2019.08.058
Baecker, 2020, Tantalum augments combined with antiprotrusio cages for massive acetabular defects in revision arthroplasty, Arthroplasty Today, 6, 704, 10.1016/j.artd.2020.07.039
Kubota, 2019, Isolated acetabular revision with femoral stem retention using computed tomography-based navigation, Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 105, 1311, 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.08.002
Wachtl, 2000, The Burch–Schneider antiprotrusio cage in acetabular revision surgery, J Arthroplasty, 15, 959, 10.1054/arth.2000.17942
Erivan, 2019, Use of morselized allografts for acetabular reconstruction during THA revision: French multicenter study of 508 cases with 8 years’ average follow-up, Orthop Traumatol Surg Resh, 105, 957, 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.02.025
Khoshbin, 2020, A cost-effectiveness assessment of dual-mobility bearings in revision hip arthroplasty, Bone Joint J, 102–B, 1128, 10.1302/0301-620X.102B9.BJJ-2019-1742.R1
Makita, 2017, Revision total hip arthroplasty using the kerboull acetabular reinforcement device and structural allograft for severe defects of the acetabulum, J Arthroplasty, 32, 3502, 10.1016/j.arth.2017.06.029
Li, 2019, Dual mobility bearing articulations result in lower rates of dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty, J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 1
Goldman, 2019, Dorr surgical techniques & technologies award: why are contemporary revision total hip arthroplasties failing? An analysis of 2500 cases, J Arthroplasty, 34, S11, 10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.031
de l’Escalopier, 2020, Dual mobility constructs in revision total hip arthroplasty: survivorship analysis in recurrent dislocation versus other indications at three to twelve-year follow-up, Int Orthop SICOT, 44, 253, 10.1007/s00264-019-04445-4
Stevenson, 2020, Instability after all-cause acetabular-only revision total hip arthroplasty remains a clinical problem, J Arthroplasty, 35, 3249, 10.1016/j.arth.2020.06.011
Springer, 2009, Why revision total hip arthroplasty fails, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 467, 166, 10.1007/s11999-008-0566-z
