Influence of concrete compressive strength on the debonding failure of externally bonded carbon fiber reinforced polymers
Tóm tắt
This paper investigates the interactions between externally bonded FRP and high strength concrete substrate in small scale reinforced concrete beams strengthened with CFRP. The bond mechanism was assessed through beam-tests adapted from ASTM, designed to simulate normal and shear stresses induced at the FRP/concrete interface. The beams were 600 mm long, with a square 150 mm × 150 mm cross-section, two 5 mm steel reinforcing bars, 6.3 mm steel stirrups spaced 75 mm apart, one single layer of externally bonded CFRP, and concrete compressive strength of 30 MPa, 50 MPa, 80 MPa, or 90 MPa. The mechanisms of damage initiation and debonding propagation showed to be highly dependent on the load transferring and the stress redistribution after concrete cracking. The use of high concrete compressive strength affected the pre-cracking response, the stress transfer, and the overall ductility at failure, resulting in a less effective FRP strengthening scheme. For service conditions, the strains in the FRP were lower, the higher the concrete compressive strength. The FRP strains at failure were below the maximum strain level to avoid intermediate crack-induced debonding determined according to current design standards.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ulaga T, Vogel T, Meier U (2003) Bilinear stress-slip bond model: theoretical background and significance. In: Proceeding FRPRCS-6 conference Singaporem pp 153–62
Siddika A, Mamun MAA, Ferdous W, Alyousef R (2020) Performances, challenges and opportunities in strengthening reinforced concrete structures by using FRPs—a state-of-the-art review. Eng Fail Anal 111:104480
Garcez M, Meneghetti L, Silva Filho LCP (2008) Structural performance of RC beams poststrengthened with carbon, aramid, and glass FRP systems. J Compos Constr 12:522–530
Dai J, Ueda T, Sato Y (2005) Development of the nonlinear bond stress-slip model of fiber reinforced plastics sheet-concrete interfaces with a simple method. J Compos Constr 9:52–62
Smith ST, Teng JG (2002) FRP-strengthened RC beams. I: review of debonding strength models. Eng Struct 24:385–395
Triantafillou T, Matthys S (2013) Fibre-reinforced polymer reinforcement enters fib Model Code 2010. Struct Concr 14:335–341
ACI (2017) Guide for the design and construction of externally bonded FRP systems for strengthening concrete structures (ACI 440.2R–17). American Concrete Institute
Täljsten B (1996) Strengthening of concrete prisms using the plate-bonding technique. Int J Fract 82:253–266
Brosens K (1998) DVG. Plate end and shear design for external CFRP laminates. In: Proceedings of Fract Mech Concr Struct Fram. Freiburg: AEDIFICATO Publishers, pp 1793–804
Teng JG, Smith ST, Yao J, Chen JF (2003) Intermediate crack-induced debonding in RC beams and slabs. Constr Build Mater 17:447–462
Brosens K, Van Gemert D (1999) Anchorage design for externally bonded carbon fiber-reinforced polymer laminates. In: Proceedings of FRPRCS-4, pp 635–645
Monti, M; Renzelli, M; Luciani P (2003) FRP adhesion in uncracked and cracked concrete zone. In: Proceedings of 6th international symposium FRP Reinf Concr Struct. Singapore: World Scientific Publications, pp 183–92
Hadigheh SA, Gravina RJ, Setunge S (2015) Prediction of the bond-slip law in externally laminated concrete substrates by an analytical based nonlinear approach. Mater Des 66:217–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.10.061
Chen JF, Teng JG (2001) Anchorage strength models for FRP and steel plates bonded to concrete. J Struct Eng 127:784–791
Lu XZ, Teng JG, Ye LP, Jiang JJ (2005) Bond—slip models for FRP sheets/plates bonded to concrete. Eng Struct 27:920–937
Ko H, Matthys S, Palmieri A, Sato Y (2014) Development of a simplified bond stress-slip model for bonded FRP-concrete interfaces. Constr Build Mater 68:142–157
Oehlers DJ (1993) Reinforced concrete beams with plates glued to their soffits. J Struct Eng 118:2023–2038
Smith ST, Teng JG (2002) FRP-strengthened RC beams. II: Assessment of debonding strength models. Eng Struct 24:397–417
Smith ST, Gravina RJ (2007) Modeling debonding failure in FRP flexurally strengthened rc members using a local deformation model. J Compos Constr 11:184–191
Hadigheh SA, Gravina RJ (2016) Generalization of the interface law for different FRP processing techniques in FRP-to-concrete bonded interfaces. Compos Part B Eng 91:399–407
Varastehpour HI, Hamelin P (1997) Strengthening of concrete beams using fiber-reinforced plastics. Mater Struct 30:160–166
Nakaba K, Kanakubo T, Furuta T, Yoshizawa H (2001) Bond behavior between fiber-reinforced polymer laminates and concrete. ACI Struct J 98:359–367
Savioa M, Farracuti B, Mazzotti D (2003) Non-linear bond-slip law for FRP-concrete interface. In: Proceedings of 6th international symposium FRP Reinf Concr Struct. Singapore: World Scientific Publications, pp 163–72
Chajes MJ, Finch WW, Januszka TF, Thomson TA (1996) Bond and force transfer of composite-material plates bonded to concrete. ACI Struct J 93:209–217
Horiguchi T (1997) Effect of test methods and quality of concrete on bond strength of CFRP sheet. In: International symposium on non-metallic reinf concr struct, pp 265–70
Sato Y, Asano Y, Ueda T (2000) Fundamental study on bond mechanism of carbon fiber sheet. J Civ Eng Stud 648:97–115
Kurtz S, Balaguru P, Helm J (2008) Experimental study of interfacial shear stresses in FRP-strengthened RC beams. J Compos Constr 12:312–322
Athawale P (2012) Analysis of factors affecting effective bond length for fiber reinfroced polymer composite laminate. Texas Tech University
Zhou Y, Zheng S, Huang Z, Sui L, Chen Y (2020) Explicit neural network model for predicting FRP-concrete interfacial bond strength based on a large database. Compos Struct 240:111998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.111998
Yuan H, Lu X, Hui D, Feo L (2012) Studies on FRP-concrete interface with hardening and softening bond-slip law. Compos Struct 94:3781–3792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.06.009
Chen JF, Yuan H, Teng JG (2007) Debonding failure along a softening FRP-to-concrete interface between two adjacent cracks in concrete members. Eng Struct 29:259–270
Teng JG, Chen JF, Smith ST, Lam L (2002) FRP strengthened RC structures. Wiley, West Sussex
FIB (2013) fib Model code for concrete structures 2010. Ernst & Sohn, Lausane
López-gonzález JC, Fernández-gómez J, González-valle E (2012) Effect of adhesive thickness and concrete strength on FRP-concrete bonds. J Compos Constr 16:705–711
Wang J (2006) Cohesive zone model of intermediate crack-induced debonding of FRP-plated concrete beam. Int J Solids Struct 43:6630–6648
Niu H, Karbhari VM, Wu Z (2006) Diagonal macro-crack induced debonding mechanisms in FRP rehabilitated concrete. Compos Part B Eng 37:627–641
ASTM (2020) Standard test method for evaluation of performance for FRP composite bonded to concrete substrate using beam test. ASTM, Pennsylvania
Wu Z, Hemdan S (2005) Debonding in FRP-strengthened flexural members with different shear-span ratios. In: Proceedings of 7th international symposium fiber—reinf polym reinf concr struct, pp 411–26
Pan J, Leung CKY (2009) Effect of concrete composition on interfacial parameters governing FRP debonding from the concrete substrate. Adv Struct Eng 12:627–637
Mehdikhani M, Gorbatikh L, Verpoest I, Lomov SV (2019) Voids in fiber-reinforced polymer composites: a review on their formation, characteristics, and effects on mechanical performance. J Compos Mater 53:1579–1669
ACI Committee 318 (2014) Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318R–14). ACI Committee, Farmington Hills
Pellegrino C, Modena C (2008) Bond-slip relationships between FRP sheets and concrete. In: Proceedings of fourth international conference FRP compos civ eng. Zurich, pp 22–4
Mukhopadhyaya BP, Swamy N (2001) Interface shear stress: a new design criterion for plate debonding. J Compos Constr 5:35–43
Garcez MR, Silva Filho LCP, Meier U (2012) Post-strengthening of reinforced concrete beams with prestressed CFRP strips: part 2: analysis under cyclic loading. IBRACON Struct Mater J 5(4):420–439. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1983-41952012000400002