Influence of chlorhexidine digluconate concentration and application time on resin–dentin bond strength durability

European Journal of Oral Sciences - Tập 117 Số 5 - Trang 587-596 - 2009
Alessandro Dourado Loguércio1, Rodrigo Stanislawczuk1, Luceli Grabicoski Polli1, Jully Anna da Costa1, Milton Domingos Michél2, Alessandra Reis1
1Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, PR, Brazil
2Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, University Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, PR, Brazil

Tóm tắt

Although it is known that chlorhexidine application may preserve resin–dentin bonds from degradation, the lowest optimal concentration and application time have yet to be established. This study evaluated the effects of different concentrations of chlorhexidine digluconate and different application times on the preservation of resin–dentin bonds formed using two etch‐and‐rinse adhesives. In experiment 1, after acid etching, the occlusal demineralized dentin was rewetted either with water or with 0.002, 0.02, 0.2, 2, or 4% chlorhexidine for 60 s. In experiment 2, the surfaces were rewetted with water, or with 0.002% or 2% chlorhexidine for 15 or 60 s. After this, both adhesives and composite resin were applied and light‐cured. Bonded sticks (0.8 mm2) were tested under tension (0.5 mm min−1) immediately or after 6 months of storage in water. Two bonded sticks from each tooth were immersed in silver nitrate and analyzed quantitatively using scanning electron microscopy. Reductions in microtensile bond strengths and higher silver nitrate uptake were observed for both adhesives when the rewetting procedure was performed with water. Stable bonds were maintained for up to 6 months under all chlorhexidine conditions tested, irrespective of the chlorhexidine concentration and application time. The use of 0.002% chlorhexidine for 15 s seems to be sufficient to preserve resin–dentin interfaces over a 6‐month period.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1177/154405910508400204

10.1016/j.jdent.2004.12.003

Tay FR, 2005, Water treeing in simplified dentin adhesives – déjà vu?, Oper Dent, 30, 561

10.1002/jbm.820160307

Van Meerbeek B, 2003, Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges, Oper Dent, 28, 215

10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199910)47:1<85::AID-JBM12>3.0.CO;2-H

Armstrong SR, 2003, Microtensile bond strength of a total‐etch 3‐step, total‐etch 2‐step, self‐etch 2‐step, and a self‐etch 1‐step dentin bonding system through 15‐month water storage, J Adhes Dent, 5, 47

10.1177/154405910308200213

Hashimoto M, 2002, The extent to which resin can infiltrate dentin by acetone‐based adhesives, J Dent Res, 81, 74, 10.1177/002203450208100116

10.1016/S0109-5641(96)80038-8

10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00262-X

10.1177/00220345980770081001

10.1177/00220345010800061301

10.1111/j.1600-0765.1995.tb01249.x

10.1177/154405910408300306

10.1016/S0003-9969(00)00052-2

10.1177/154405910708600509

10.1016/j.archoralbio.2006.08.009

10.1177/154405910508400811

10.2341/06-55

10.1177/154405910708600115

10.1177/154405910708600608

Tay FR, 2003, Have dentin adhesives become too hydrophilic?, J Can Dent Assoc, 69, 726

10.1067/moe.2001.116812

Souza LB, 2007, Cytotoxic effects of different concentrations of chlorhexidine, Am J Dent, 20, 400

Gendron R, 1999, Inhibition of the activities of matrix metaloproteinases 2, 8 and 9 by chlorhexidine, Clin Diagn Lab Immunol, 6, 437, 10.1128/CDLI.6.3.437-439.1999

10.1002/jbm.b.31295

10.2341/08-016-L

10.1177/154405910208100708

Montgomery DC, 1991, Design and analysis of experiments

Yoshiyama M, 1995, Interfacial morphology and strength of bonds made to superficial versus deep dentin, Am J Dent, 8, 297

10.1067/moe.2002.124002

10.1016/j.tripleo.2003.07.005

10.1016/0003-9969(74)90090-9

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

European Journal of Oral Sciences

Tập 117 Số 5

587-596

Thông tin tác giả