Influence of ambient temperature changes on intraoral scanning accuracy

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry - Tập 130 - Trang 755-760 - 2023
Marta Revilla-León1,2,3, Aishwa Gohil4, Abdul B. Barmak5, Miguel Gómez-Polo6, Jorge Alonso Pérez-Barquero7, Wael Att8, John C. Kois9,10,11
1Affiliate Assistant Professor Graduate Prosthodontics, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Density, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash
2Director of Research and Digital Dentistry, Kois Center, Seattle, Wash
3Adjunct Professor Graduate Prosthodontics, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, Mass
4Predoctoral student, College of Dentistry, Texas A&M University, Dallas, Texas
5Assistant Professor Clinical Research and Biostatistics, Eastman Institute of Oral Health, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
6Associate Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
7Associate Professor, Department of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
8Professor and Chair Department of Prosthodontics, Tuff University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Mass
9Founder and Director Kois Center, Seattle, Wash
10Affiliate Professor, Graduate Prosthodontics, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash
11Private practice, Seattle, Wash.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Chochlidakis, 2016, Digital versus conventional impressions for fixed prosthodontics: A systematic review and meta-analysis, J Prosthet Dent, 116, 184, 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.017 Tabesh, 2021, Marginal adaptation of zirconia complete-coverage fixed dental restorations made from digital scans or conventional impressions: A systematic review and meta-analysis, J Prosthet Dent, 125, 603, 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.01.035 Giachetti, 2020, Accuracy of digital impressions in fixed prosthodontics: A systematic review of clinical studies, Int J Prosthodont, 33, 192, 10.11607/ijp.6468 Chochlidakis, 2020, Digital versus conventional full-arch implant impressions: A prospective study on 16 edentulous maxillae, J Prosthodont, 29, 281, 10.1111/jopr.13162 Kernen, 2021, Accuracy of intraoral scans: An in vivo study of different scanning devices, J Prosthet Dent Oh, 2020, Effects of scanning strategy and scanner type on the accuracy of intraoral scans: A new approach for assessing the accuracy of scanned data, J Prosthodont, 29, 518, 10.1111/jopr.13158 Müller, 2016, Impact of digital intraoral scan strategies on the impression accuracy using the TRIOS Pod scanner, Quintessence Int, 47, 343 Revilla-León, 2020, Intraoral digital scans-Part 1: Influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of different intraoral scanners, J Prosthet Dent, 124, 372, 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.06.003 Revilla-León, 2020, Clinical study of the influence of ambient light scanning conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of an intraoral scanner, J Prosthodont, 29, 107, 10.1111/jopr.13135 Revilla-León, 2021, Analysis of different illuminance of the room lighting condition on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of an intraoral scanner, J Prosthodont, 30, 157, 10.1111/jopr.13276 Medina-Sotomayor, 2018, Relationship between resolution and accuracy of four intraoral scanners in complete-arch impressions, J Clin Exp Dent, 10, e361 Joda, 2017, The complete digital workflow in fixed prosthodontics: A systematic review, BMC Oral Health, 17, 124, 10.1186/s12903-017-0415-0 Renne, 2017, Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons, J Prosthet Dent, 118, 36, 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.024 Moon, 2020, Comparison of the accuracy of intraoral scans between complete-arch scan and quadrant scan, Prog Orthod, 21, 36, 10.1186/s40510-020-00337-1 Kim, 2020, Effect of the volumetric dimensions of a complete arch on the accuracy of scanners, J Adv Prosthodont, 12, 361, 10.4047/jap.2020.12.6.361 Waldecker, 2021, Effects of training on the execution of complete-arch scans. Part 2: Scanning accuracy, Int J Prosthodont, 34, 27, 10.11607/ijp.6940 Lim, 2018, Comparison of digital intraoral scanner reproducibility and image trueness considering repetitive experience, J Prosthet Dent, 119, 225, 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.05.002 Kim, 2016, Comparison of experience curves between two 3-dimensional intraoral scanners, J Prosthet Dent, 116, 221, 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.018 Shin, 2021, Scanning accuracy of bracket features and slot base angle in different bracket materials by four intraoral scanners: An in vitro study, Materials (Basel), 14, 365, 10.3390/ma14020365 Jin-Young Kim, 2021, Trueness of intraoral scanners in digitizing specific locations at the margin and intaglio surfaces of intracoronal preparations, J Prosthet Dent, 126, 779, 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.019 Anh, 2016, A comparison of the precision of three-dimensional images acquired by 2 digital intraoral scanners: Effects of tooth irregularity and scanning direction, Korean J Orthod, 46, 3, 10.4041/kjod.2016.46.1.3 Li, 2017, Influence of object translucency on the scanning accuracy of a powder-free intraoral scanner: A laboratory study, J Prosthet Dent, 117, 93, 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.04.008 Nagy, 2020, Comparing the trueness of seven intraoral scanners and a physical impression on dentate human maxilla by a novel method, BMC Oral Health, 20, 97, 10.1186/s12903-020-01090-x Mizumoto, 2018, Intraoral scan bodies in implant dentistry: A systematic review, J Prosthet Dent, 120, 343, 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.10.029 Fluegge, 2017, A Novel method to evaluate precision of optical implant impressions with commercial scan bodies—an experimental approach, J Prosthodont, 26, 34, 10.1111/jopr.12362 Moslemion, 2020, Do type and shape of scan bodies affect accuracy and time of digital implant impressions?, Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, 28, 18 Mizumoto, 2020, Accuracy of different digital scanning techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses, J Prosthet Dent, 123, 96, 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.01.003 Arcuri, 2020, Influence of implant scanbody material, position and operator on the accuracy of digital impression for complete-arch: A randomized in vitro trial, J Prosthodont Res, 64, 128, 10.1016/j.jpor.2019.06.001 Basaki, 2017, Accuracy of digital vs conventional implant impression approach: A three-dimensional comparative in vitro analysis, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 32, 792, 10.11607/jomi.5431 Carneiro Pereira, 2021, Influence of implant position on the accuracy of intraoral scanning in fully edentulous arches: A systematic review, J Prosthet Dent, 126, 749, 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.008 Gimenez-Gonzalez, 2017, An in vitro study of factors influencing the performance of digital intraoral impressions operating on active wavefront sampling technology with multiple implants in the edentulous maxilla, J Prosthodont, 26, 650, 10.1111/jopr.12457 Gimenez, 2015, Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active triangulation technology with blue light for implants: Effect of clinically relevant parameters, Implant Dent, 24, 498, 10.1097/ID.0000000000000283 Zhang, 2021, Accuracy of full-arch digital implant impressions taken using intraoral scanners and related variables: A systematic review, Int J Oral Implantol (Berl), 14, 157 Choi, 2020, Effects of scan body exposure and operator on the accuracy of image matching of implant impressions with scan bodies, J Prosthet Dent, 124, 379.e1, 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.04.004 Adamczyk, 2014, Effect of temperature on calibration quality of structured-light three-dimensional scanners, Appl Opt, 53, 5154, 10.1364/AO.53.005154 Adamczyk, 2020, Temperature compensation method for raster projectors used in 3D structured light scanners, Sensors (Basel), 20, 5778, 10.3390/s20205778 Culton, 2003, The effect of room temperature on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, Osteoporos Int, 14, 137, 10.1007/s00198-002-1330-y Teixeira, 2019, On the feasibility of ultrasound imaging enrichment by medium-temperature changes, Ultrason Imaging, 41, 17, 10.1177/0161734618800660