Influence of adhesive system and bevel preparation on fracture strength of teeth restored with composite resin

Brazilian Dental Journal - Tập 21 Số 4 - Trang 327-331 - 2010
Fábio Herrmann Coelho-de-Souza1, Analice da Cunha Rocha2, Alessandro Rubini2, Celso Afonso Klein-Júnior3, Flávio Fernando Demarco4
1Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre, Brazil
2Clinical Practice, Pelotas, Brazil
3Lutheran University of Brazil, Cachoeira do Sul, Brazil
4Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil

Tóm tắt

The aim of this study was to evaluate the fracture strength of teeth with different cavosurface margin cavity preparations and restored with composite resin and different adhesive systems. Eighty premolars were randomly divided in 8 groups, as follow: G1- sound teeth; G2- MOD preparation (no restoration); G3- Adper Single Bond without bevel preparation (butt joint); G4- Adper Single Bond with bevel preparation; G5- Adper Single Bond with chamfer preparation; G6- Clearfil SE Bond without bevel (butt joint); G7- Clearfil SE Bond with bevel preparation; G8- Clearfil SE Bond with chamfer preparation. The adhesive systems were applied according to manufacturers’ instructions. Composite resin (Filtek Z250) was incrementally placed in all cavities. After 24 h, the specimens were tested in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey’s test (fracture strength) and Fisher’s exact test (fracture pattern). The confidence level was set at 95% for all tests. Prepared and non-restored teeth showed the worst performance and G4 exhibited the highest fracture strength among all groups (p<0.05). In conclusion, all restorative treatments were able to recover the fracture strength of non-restored teeth to levels similar to those of sound teeth. Using a total-etch adhesive system with bevel preparation significantly improved the resistance to fracture.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Van Meerbeek B, 2003, . Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges, Oper Dent, 28, 215

Pires-de-Souza FC, 2009, Polymerization shinkage stress of composites photoativated by different light sources, Braz Dent J, 20, 319, 10.1590/S0103-64402009000400010

Mondelli J, 1980, Fracture strength of human teeth with cavity preparations, J Prosthet Dent, 43, 419, 10.1016/0022-3913(80)90213-9

Habekost LV, 2007, Fracture resistance of thermal cycled and endodontically treated premolars with adhesive restorations, J Prosthet Dent, 98, 186, 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60054-7

Morimoto S, 2009, Fracture strength of teeth restored with ceramic inlays and overlays, Braz Dent J, 20, 143, 10.1590/S0103-64402009000200010

Perdigão J, 2006, Influence of conditioning time on enamel adhesion, Quintessence Int, 37, 35

Yang B, 2006, Micro-tensile bond strength of three luting resins to human regional dentin, Dent Mater, 22, 45, 10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.009

Opdam NJM, 1998, Necessity of bevels for box only class II composite restoration, J Prosthet Dent, 80, 274, 10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70127-1

Reis A, 2001, Re-attachment of anterior fractured teeth: fracture strength using different techniques, Oper Dent, 26, 287

Coelho-de-Souza FH, 2008, Fracture resistance and gap formation of MOD restoration: influence of restorative technique, bevel preparation and water storage, Oper Dent, 33, 37, 10.2341/07-27

Goracci C, 2004, Bonding to worn or fractured incisal edges: shear bond strength of new adhesive systems, Quintessence Int, 35, 21

Carvalho RM, 1996, A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress development versus stress relief, Oper Dent, 21, 17

Sano H, 2006, Microtensile testing, nanoleakage and biodegradation of resin-dentin bonds, J Dent Res, 85, 11, 10.1177/154405910608500102

Peixoto RT, 2002, The influence of occlusal finish line configuration on microleakage of indirect composite inlays, J Adhes Dent, 4, 145

Gandhi K, 2006, Effect of enamel preparations on fracture resistance of composite resin build-up of fractures involving dentine in anterior bovine teeth: an in vitro study, J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent, 24, 69, 10.4103/0970-4388.26019

Cenci MS, 2008, The effect of polishing techniques and time on the surface characteristics and sealing ability of resin composite restorations after one-year storage, Oper Dent, 33, 165, 10.2341/07-66

Schmidlin PR, 2007, Influence of beveling and ultrasound application on marginal adaptation of box-only class II (slot) resin composite restorations, Oper Dent, 32, 291, 10.2341/06-84

Rotta M, 2007, Effects of phosphoric acid pretreatment and substitution of bonding resin on bonding effectiveness of self-etching systems to enamel, J Adhes Dent, 9, 537

Moura SK, 2006, Does the acidity of self-etching primers affect bond strength and surface morphology of enamel?, J Adhes Dent, 8, 75

Coelho-de-Souza FH, 2010, Double-blind randomized clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with and without bevel: 6-month follow-up, J Contemp Dent Pract, 11, 1, 10.5005/jcdp-11-2-1

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Brazilian Dental Journal

Tập 21 Số 4

327-331

Thông tin tác giả