Inferring ecological explanations for biogeographic boundaries of parapatric Asian mountain frogs

Junhua Hu1, Jianping Jiang2
1Key Laboratory of Southwest China Wildlife Resource Conservation (China West Normal University), Ministry of Education, Nanchong, 637009, China
2Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China

Tóm tắt

Abstract Background

Identifying and understanding the mechanisms that shape barriers to dispersal and resulting biogeographic boundaries has been a longstanding, yet challenging, goal in ecology, evolution and biogeography. Characterized by stable, adjacent ranges, without any intervening physical barriers, and limited, if any, range overlap in a narrow contact zone, parapatric species are an interesting system for studying biogeographic boundaries. The geographic ranges of two parapatric frog species, Feirana quadranus and F. taihangnica, meet in a contact zone within the Qinling Mountains, an important watershed for East Asia. To identify possible ecological determinants of the parapatric range boundaries for two closely related frog species, we quantified the extent of their niche differentiation in both geographical and environmental space combining ecological niche models with an ordination technique. We tested two alternative null hypotheses (sharp environmental gradients versus a ribbon of unsuitable habitat dividing two highly suitable regions) for biogeographic boundaries, against the null expectation that environmental variation across a given boundary is no greater than expected by chance.

Results

We found that the niches of these two parapatric species are more similar than expected by chance, but not equivalent. No sharp environmental gradient was found, while a ribbon of unsuitable habitat did act as a barrier for F. quadranus, but not for F. taihangnica.

Conclusions

Integrating our findings with historical biogeographic information, our results suggest that at a contact zone, environmental tolerance restricted F. quadranus from dispersing further north, while interspecific competition most likely prevented the southward expansion of F. taihangnica. This study highlights the importance of both climate and competition in exploring ecological explanations for parapatric range boundaries between ecologically similar frog species, in particular under the effects of changing climate.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Kubisch A, Holt RD, Poethke HJ, Fronhofer EA. Where am I and why? Synthesizing range biology and the eco-evolutionary dynamics of dispersal. Oikos. 2014;123(1):5–22.

Gaston KJ. Geographic range limits of species. Proc R Soc B. 2009;276(1661):1391–3.

Holt RD. On the evolutionary ecology of species’ ranges. Evol Ecol Res. 2003;5(2):159–78.

Werner P, Lötters S, Schmidt BR, Engler JO, Rödder D. The role of climate for the range limits of parapatric European land salamanders. Ecography. 2013;36(10):1127–37.

Geber MA. Ecological and evolutionary limits to species geographic ranges. Am Nat. 2011;178(4):S1–5.

Svenning JC, Gravel D, Holt RD, Schurr FM, Thuiller W, Münkemüller T, Schiffers KH, Dullinger S, Edwards TC, Hickler T, et al. The influence of interspecific interactions on species range expansion rates. Ecography. 2014;37(12):1198–209.

Cunningham HR, Rissler LJ, Apodaca JJ. Competition at the range boundary in the slimy salamander: using reciprocal transplants for studies on the role of biotic interactions in spatial distributions. J Anim Ecol. 2009;78(1):52–62.

Bridle JR, Vines TH. Limits to evolution at range margins: when and why does adaptation fail? Trends Ecol Evol. 2007;22(3):140–7.

Gifford ME, Kozak KH. Islands in the sky or squeezed at the top? Ecological causes of elevational range limits in montane salamanders. Ecography. 2012;35(3):193–203.

Soberón J. Grinnellian and Eltonian niches and geographic distributions of species. Ecol Lett. 2007;10(12):1115–23.

Cunningham HR, Rissler LJ, Buckley LB, Urban MC. Abiotic and biotic constraints across reptile and amphibian ranges. Ecography. 2016;39(1):1–8.

Parmesan C, Gaines S, Gonzalez L, Kaufman DM, Kingsolver J, Townsend Peterson A, Sagarin R. Empirical perspectives on species borders: from traditional biogeography to global change. Oikos. 2005;108(1):58–75.

Sexton JP, McIntyre PJ, Angert AL, Rice KJ. Evolution and ecology of species range limits. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2009;40(1):415–36.

Cahill AE, Aiello-Lammens ME, Caitlin Fisher-Reid M, Hua X, Karanewsky CJ, Ryu HY, Sbeglia GC, Spagnolo F, Waldron JB, Wiens JJ. Causes of warm-edge range limits: systematic review, proximate factors and implications for climate change. J Biogeogr. 2014;41(3):429–42.

Gaston KJ. The structure and dynamics of geographic ranges. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.

Gross SJ, Price TD. Determinants of the northern and southern range limits of a warbler. J Biogeogr. 2000;27(4):869–78.

Buckley LB, Jetz W. Environmental and historical constraints on global patterns of amphibian richness. Proc R Soc B. 2007;274(1614):1167–73.

McQuillan MA, Rice AM. Differential effects of climate and species interactions on range limits at a hybrid zone: potential direct and indirect impacts of climate change. Ecol Evol. 2015;5(21):5120–37.

MacArthur RH. Geographical ecology: patterns in the distribution of species. New York: Harper and Row; 1972.

Wiens JJ, Ackerly DD, Allen AP, Anacker BL, Buckley LB, Cornell HV, Damschen EI, Davies TJ, Grytnes JA, Harrison SP, et al. Niche conservatism as an emerging principle in ecology and conservation biology. Ecol Lett. 2010;13(10):1310–24.

Glor RE, Warren D. Testing ecological explanations for biogeographic boundaries. Evolution. 2011;65(3):673–83.

Lee-Yaw JA, Irwin DE. The importance (or lack thereof) of niche divergence to the maintenance of a northern species complex: the case of the long-toed salamander (Ambystoma macrodactylum Baird). J Evol Biol. 2015;28(4):917–30.

Peers MJL, Thornton DH, Murray DL. Evidence for large-scale effects of competition: niche displacement in Canada lynx and bobcat. Proc R Soc B. 2013;280(1773):20132495.

Wang B, Jiang J, Xie F, Chen X, Dubois A, Liang G, Wagner S. Molecular phylogeny and genetic identification of populations of two species of Feirana frogs (Amphibia: Anura, Ranidae, Dicroglossinae, Paini) endemic to China. Zool Sci. 2009;26(7):500–9.

Wang B, Jiang J, Xie F, Li C. Postglacial colonization of the Qinling Mountains: phylogeography of the swelled vent frog (Feirana quadranus). PLoS ONE. 2012;7(7):e41579.

Wang B, Jiang J, Xie F, Li C. Phylogeographic patterns of mtDNA variation revealed multiple glacial refugia for the frog species Feirana taihangnica endemic to the Qinling Mountains. J Mol Evol. 2013;76(3):112–28.

Fei L, Hu S, Ye C, Huang Y. Fauna Sinica. Amphibia. Vol. 3. Anura Ranidae. Beijing: Science Press; 2009.

Yang X, Wang B, Hu J, Jiang J. A new species of the genus Feirana (Amphibia: Anura: Dicroglossidae) from the western Qinling Mountains of China. Asian Herpetol Res. 2011;2(2):72–86.

Yang X. Speciation and geographic distribution pattern of the genus Feirana. Chengdu: Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences; 2011.

Warren DL, Glor RE, Turelli M. Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatism: quantitative approaches to niche evolution. Evolution. 2008;62(11):2868–83.

Hu J, Broennimann O, Guisan A, Wang B, Huang Y, Jiang J. Niche conservatism in Gynandropaa frogs on the southeastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Sci Rep. 2016;6:32624.

Broennimann O, Fitzpatrick MC, Pearman PB, Petitpierre B, Pellissier L, Yoccoz NG, Thuiller W, Fortin M-J, Randin C, Zimmermann NE, et al. Measuring ecological niche overlap from occurrence and spatial environmental data. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2012;21(4):481–97.

Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model. 2006;190(3–4):231–59.

Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol. 2005;25(15):1965–78.

Wells K. The ecology and behavior of amphibians. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 2007.

Phillips SJ, Dudík M. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography. 2008;31(2):161–75.

Swets J. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science. 1988;240(4857):1285–93.

Liu CR, Berry PM, Dawson TP, Pearson RG. Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions. Ecography. 2005;28(3):385–93.

Hu J, Jiang Z, Chen J, Qiao H. Niche divergence accelerates evolution in Asian endemic Procapra gazelles. Sci Rep. 2015;5:10069.

Warren DL, Glor RE, Turelli M. ENMTools: a toolbox for comparative studies of environmental niche models. Ecography. 2010;33(3):607–11.

R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/; 2013. Accessed 25 June 2015.

Hof C, Araújo MB, Jetz W, Rahbek C. Additive threats from pathogens, climate and land-use change for global amphibian diversity. Nature. 2011;480(7378):516–9.

Peterson AT. Ecological niche conservatism: a time-structured review of evidence. J Biogeogr. 2011;38(5):817–27.

McCormack JE, Zellmer AJ, Knowles LL. Does niche divergence accompany allopatric divergence in Aphelocoma jays as predicted under ecological speciation? Insights from tests with niche models. Evolution. 2010;64(5):1231–44.

Pearman PB, Guisan A, Broennimann O, Randin CF. Niche dynamics in space and time. Trends Ecol Evol. 2008;23(3):149–58.

Angilletta MJ. Thermal adaptation: a theoretical and empirical synthesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.

Araújo MB, Guisan A. Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling. J Biogeogr. 2006;33(10):1677–88.

Bull CM. Ecology of parapatric distributions. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1991;22:19–36.

Case TJ, Holt RD, McPeek MA, Keitt TH. The community context of species’ borders: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Oikos. 2005;108(1):28–46.

Acevedo P, Jiménez-Valverde A, Melo-Ferreira J, Real R, Alves PC. Parapatric species and the implications for climate change studies: a case study on hares in Europe. Glob Change Biol. 2012;18(5):1509–19.

Araújo MB, Rozenfeld A. The geographic scaling of biotic interactions. Ecography. 2014;37(5):406–15.

Laube I, Graham CH, Böhning-Gaese K. Intra-generic species richness and dispersal ability interact to determine geographic ranges of birds. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2013;22(2):223–32.

Hua F, Hu J, Liu Y, Giam X, Lee TM, Luo H, Wu J, Liang Q, Zhao J, Long X, et al. Community-wide changes in intertaxonomic temporal co-occurrence resulting from phenological shifts. Glob Change Biol. 2016;22(5):1746–54.