Infallibility in the Newcomb Problem

Ahmed, A. (2014). Evidence, decision and causality. Cambridge: CUP (forthcoming).

Allais, M. (1953). Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulats et axiomes de l’école américaine. Econometrica, 21, 503–546.

Anand, P. (1990). Two types of utility. Greek Economic Review, 12, 58–74.

Bach, K. (1987). Newcomb’s problem: The $1M solution. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 17, 409–425.

Broome, J. (1989). An economic Newcomb problem. Analysis, 49, 220–222.

Clark, M. (2007). Paradoxes from A to Z (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

Craig, W. L. (1987). Divine foreknowledge and Newcomb’s paradox. Philosophia, 17, 331–350.

Eells, E. (1982). Rational decision and causality. Cambridge: CUP.

Egan, A. (2007). Some counterexamples to causal decision theory. The Philosophical Review, 116, 93–114.

Fischer, J. M. (1994). The metaphysics of free will: An essay on control. Oxford: OUP.

Gibbard, A., & Harper, W. (1978). Counterfactuals and two kinds of expected utility. In C. Hooker, J. Leach & E. McClennen (Eds.), Foundations and applications of decision theory (pp. 125–162). Riedel, Dordrecht. Reprinted in P. Gärdenfors & N.-E. Sahlin (Eds.), Decision, probability and utility (1988). CUP, Cambridge.

Horgan, T. (1981). Counterfactuals and Newcomb’s problem. The Journal of Philosophy, 78, 331–356.

Horgan, T. (1985). Newcomb’s problem: A stalemate. In R. Campbell & L. Sowden (Eds.), Paradoxes of rationality and cooperation: Prisoner’s dilemma and Newcomb’s problem (1985) (pp. 223–234). Vancouver: UBC Press.

Hubin, D., & Ross, G. (1985). Newcomb’s perfect predictor. Noûs, 19, 439–446.

Jeffrey, R. (1965). The logic of decision. Chicago: Chicago UP.

Jeffrey, R. (1983). The logic of decision (2nd ed.). Chicago: Chicago UP.

Joyce, J. (1999). Foundations of causal decision theory. Cambridge: CUP.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 4481, 453–458.

Ledwig, M. (2000). Newcomb’s problem. Dissertation submitted to the University of Constance. http://kops.ub.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/handle/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-opus-5241/ledwig.pdf?sequence=1 . Accessed 2 Feb 2014.

Leeds, S. (1984). Eells and Jeffrey on Newcomb’s problem. Philosophical Studies, 46, 97–107.

Leslie, J. (1991). Ensuring two bird deaths with one throw. Mind, 100, 73–86.

Levi, I. (1975). Newcomb’s many problems. Theory and Decision, 6, 161–175.

Lewis, D. (1979). Counterfactual dependence and time’s arrow. Nous, 13, 455–476. Reprinted in his Philosophical papers (Vol. 2, 1986). Oxford: OUP.

Lewis, D. (1981). Causal decision theory. Australian Journal of Philosophy, 59, 5–30.

Meek, C., & Glymour, C. (1994). Conditioning and intervening. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 45, 1001–1021.

Nozick, R. (1969). Newcomb’s problem and two principles of choice. In N. Rescher (Ed.) Essays in honor of Carl G. Hempel (pp. 114–146). D. Reidel, Dordrecht. Reprinted in Moser P. (ed.) Rationality in action: Contemporary approaches (1990). Cambridge: CUP.

Nozick, R. (1993). The nature of rationality. Princeton: Princeton UP.

Price, H. (2012). Causation, chance and the rational significance of supernatural evidence. The Philosophical Review, 121, 483–538.

Resnik, M. (1987). Choices: An introduction to decision theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Seidenfeld, T. (1984). Comments on causal decision theory. PSA, 1984, 201–212.

Shafir, S., Reich, T., Tsur, E., Erev, I., & Lotem, A. (2008). Perceptual accuracy and conflicting effects of certainty on risk-taking behaviour. Nature, 453, 917–920.

Skyrms, B. (1980). Causal necessity. New Haven: Yale UP.

Sloman, S. (2005). Causal models. Oxford: OUP.

Sobel, J. H. (1988). Infallible predictors. Philosophical Review, 97, 3–24. Reprinted in his Taking chances (1994). Cambridge: CUP.

Spohn, W. (2012). Reversing 30 years of discussion: Why causal decision theorists should one-box. Synthese, 187, 95–122.

Wedgwood, R. (2013). Gandalf’s solution to the Newcomb problem. Synthese, 190, 2643–2675.

Weirich, P. (1998). Equilibrium and rationality: Game theory revised by decision rules. Cambridge: CUP.

Weirich, P. (2001). Decision space: Multidimensional utility analysis. Cambridge: CUP.