Inelastic seismic response of steel bracing members

Archambault, 1995

Black, 1980

Gugerli H. Inelastic cyclic behavior of steel members. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 1982.

Lee S, Goel SC. Seismic behavior of hollow and concrete-filled square tubular bracing members. Research Report UMCE 87-11. Ann Arbor, MI: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Michigan. 1987.

Leowardi LS, Walpole WR. Performance of steel brace members. Research Report 96-3. Christchurch, New Zealand: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, 1996.

Liu Z. Investigation of concrete-filled steel tubes under cyclic bending and buckling. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 1987.

Shaback JB. Behaviour of square HSS braces with end connections under reversed cyclic axial loading. Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada, 2001.

Wakabayashi, 1977, Experimental studies on the elastic–plastic behavior of braced frames under repeated horizontal loading, Bull Disaster Prev Res Inst, Kyoto Univ, 27, 121

Walpole WR. Behaviour of cold-formed steel RHS members under cyclic loading. Research Report 96-4. Christchurch, New Zealand: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury. 1996.

Astaneh-Asl, 1984, Cyclic in-plane buckling of double-angle bracing, J Struct Engng, ASCE, 109, 2036, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1984)110:9(2036)

AstanehAsl, 1985, Cyclic out-of-plane buckling of double-angle bracing, J Struct Engng, ASCE, 111, 1135, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:5(1135)

El-Tayem, 1986, Effective length factor for the design of X-bracing systems, Engng J, AISC, 24, 41

Higginbotham, 1976, Axial hysteretic behavior of steel members, J Struct Div, ASCE, 102, 1365, 10.1061/JSDEAG.0004387

Jain, 1980, Hysteretic cycles of axially loaded steel members, J Struct Div, ASCE, 106, 1777, 10.1061/JSDEAG.0005498

Jain, 1978, Inelastic response of restrained steel tubes, J Struct Div, ASCE, 104, 897, 10.1061/JSDEAG.0004942

Kahn, 1976, Inelastic cycles of axially loaded steel members, J Struct Div, ASCE, 102, 947, 10.1061/JSDEAG.0004355

Perotti, 1991, Concentrically braced steel frames under seismic actions: non-linear behaviour and design coefficients, Earthq Engng Struct Dynam, 20, 409, 10.1002/eqe.4290200503

Pons HF. Dynamic behavior of tubular bracing members with single plate concentric connections. Master’s Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, 1997.

Prathuangsit, 1978, Axial hysteresis behavior with end restraints, J Struct Div, ASCE, 104, 883, 10.1061/JSDEAG.0004941

1997

1994

ECCS. ECCS—TWG 1.3 seismic design—European Recommendations for Steel Structures in Seismic Zones. Brussels, Belgium: European Convention for Constructional Steelwork. 1991.

SNZ. NZS 3404: Part 1: Steel Structures Standard. Wellington, New Zealand: Standards New Zealand. 1997.

Jain AK, Goel SC. Hysteresis models for steel members subjected to cyclic buckling or cyclic end moments and buckling (User’s Guide for Drain-2D: EL9 and EL10). Report UMEE 78R6. Ann Arbor, MI: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Michigan. 1978.

Ikeda K, Mahin SA, Stavros ND. Phenomenological modeling of steel braces under cyclic loading. Report UCB/EERC-84/09. Berkeley, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, University of California. 1984.

Ikeda K, Mahin SA. A refined physical theory model for predicting the seismic behavior of braced steel frames. Report UCB/EERC-84/12. Berkeley, CA: Earthquake Engineering Reasearch Center, College of Engineering, University of California. 1984.

Hassan OF, Goel SC. Modeling of bracing members and seismic behavior of concentrically braced steel structures. Research Report UMCE 91-1. Ann Arbor, MI: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Michigan. 1991.

Remennikov AM, Walpole AM. Incremental model for predicting the inelastic hysteretic behaviour of steel bracing members. Research Report 95-6. Christchurch, New Zealand: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury. 1995.

Caron, 1997

Khatib IF, Mahin SA, Pister KS. Seismic behavior of concentrically braced steel frames. Report UCB/EERC-88/01. Berkeley, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California. 1988.

Midorikawa, 1988, Static and dynamic analysis of full-scale concentrically K-braced steel building, 255

Redwood, 1991, Seismic response of concentrically braced steel frames, Can J Civil Engng, 18, 1062, 10.1139/l91-129

Remennikov, 1998, Seismic behavior and deterministic design procedures for steel V-braced frames, Earthq Spectra, 14, 335, 10.1193/1.1586004

Remennikov, 1997, Analytical prediction of seismic behaviour for concentrically-braced steel systems, Earthq Engng Struct Dynam, 26, 859, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199708)26:8<859::AID-EQE684>3.0.CO;2-9

Tang X, Goel SC. Seismic analysis and design considerations of braced steel structures. Research Report UMCE 87-4. Ann Arbor, MI: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Michigan. 1987.

Tremblay R, Robert N. Seismic performance of low- and medium-rise chevron braced steel frames. Can J Civil Engng 2001, in press.

Tremblay, 1991, Aspects of the seismic design of concentrically braced frames, 315

Tremblay, 1991, Seismic behavior of concentrically braced steel frames, 291

Feeney MJ, Clifton GC. Seismic design procedures for steel structures. HERA Report R4-76. Manukau City, New Zealand: Heavy Engineering Research Association (HERA). 1995.

Tremblay R. Seismic behaviour and design of concentrically braced steel frames. AISC Engng J 2000, in press.

Nakashima, 1992, Effect of strain hardening on post-buckling resistance of steel braces, 561

Remennikov, 1998, A note on compression strength reduction factor for a buckled strut in seismic-resisting braced system, Engng Struct, 20, 779, 10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00106-5

Tremblay, 1996, Seismic design of steel buildings: lessons from the 1995 Hyogoken–Nanbu earthquake, Can J Civil Engng, 23, 727, 10.1139/l96-885

Tang X, Goel SC. Seismic analysis and design considerations of braced steel structures. Research Report UMCE 87-4. Ann Arbor, MI: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Michigan. 1987.

Foutch, 1986, Seismic testing of full-scale steel building—Part I, J Struct Engng, ASCE, 113, 2111, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1987)113:11(2111)

Tremblay, 1995, Performance of steel structures during the January 17, 1994 Northridge earthquake, Can J Civil Engng, 22, 338, 10.1139/l95-046

SAC. FEMA 267—Interim guidelines: evaluation, repair, modification and design of welded steel moment frame structures. Report No. SAC-95-02. Sacramento, CA: SAC Joint Venture. 1995.

1998

Loov, 1996, A simple equation for axially loaded steel column design curves, Can J Civil Engng, 23, 272, 10.1139/l96-028

AISC. Load and resistance factor design specification for structural steel buildings. Chicago, IL: American Institute of Steel Construction Inc. (AISC). 1999.

SNZ. NZS 3404: Part 2: Commentary to the steel structures standard. Wellington, New Zealand: Standards New Zealand. 1997.

SEAOC. Recommended lateral force requirements and commentary. Sacramento, CA: Seismology Committee, Structural Engineers Association of California. 1990.

Nakashima, 1992, Analysis and design of steel braces and braced frames in building structures, 309

CSA. CAN/CSA-S16.1-01, Limit states design of steel structures (pre-ballot draft, April 2001). Rexdale, Ont.: Canadian Standard Association. 2001.

Shermann, 1996, Designing with structural tubing, Engng Jl, AISC, 3rd Quarter, 101