Inelastic Displacement Amplification Factor for Ductile Structures with Constant Strength Reduction Factor

Advances in Structural Engineering - Tập 13 Số 1 - Trang 15-28 - 2010
Yongfeng Zhao1,2, Gen-Shu Tong1
1Department of Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, P.R.C.
2Department of Civil Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027, P.R.C.

Tóm tắt

Based on elastic-plastic time-history earthquake analysis of the single degree of freedom (SDOF) system, the inelastic displacement amplification factor Cd2 of the elastic-perfectly plastic (EPP) model with the same yield strength reduction was investigated for different normalized periods T/TgR, site types, strength reduction factors R, damping ratios, post yield stiffness ratios and second order ( P-Δ) effects. The factor Cd2 can be used to estimate the maximum inelastic response displacement from the elastic displacement under the design seismic conditions. It is found that the probability distribution of Cd2 satisfies the lognormal distribution approximately. The factor Cd2 decreases with decreasing damping (in the medium-long period range) and with increasing post yield stiffness. The existence of the P-Δ effect will increase Cd2 significantly and needs to be considered in future seismic design. Three other hysteretic models: the modified-Clough (MC), shear-slipped (SSP) and bilinear elastic (BIL) models, were analyzed to check the effect of the hysteretic model on Cd2 spectra The results were compared to those of the EPP model and it was found that the Cd2 of the EPP model is the smallest among the four hysteretic models.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

ACJ, 1997, The Provisions for Building Structures-Commentary and Implementation for Chapter 3 in Building Standards

AIJ, 1999, Design Guidelines for Earthquake Resistant Reinforced Concrete Buildings Based on Inelastic Displacement Concept

AIJ, 2002, Recommendation for Limit State Design of Steel Structures

CECS160: 2400, 2004, General Rules for Performance-Based Seismic Design of Buildings

Chopra A.K., 2000, Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, 2

Eurocode 8, 2003, Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance

FEMA450 (NEHRP), 2003, Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Dtructures Part 1: Provisions

GB50011, 2001, Code for Seismic Design of Buildings

10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:1(145)

10.1002/eqe.552

10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:5(1319)

SEAOC, 1996, Recommended Lateral Force Requirements and Commentary

10.1260/136943309789508492

10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.12.007

10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:8(2423)

UBC, 1997, Uniform Building Code

Zhai C.H., 2005, Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 37, 45