Industrial design students’ perceptions towards a career in user experience field in Turkey

Sedef Süner-Pla-Cerdà1, Aslı Günay2, Gülşen Töre Yargın3, Haktan Ural4
1Department of Industrial Design, TED University, Ankara, Turkey
2Department of Media and Visual Arts, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
3UTEST Product Usability Unit, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey
4Department of Sociology, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey

Tóm tắt

The rapid growth of the user experience (UX) field has brought efforts to meet the increasing demand for specialists by welcoming professionals from diverse disciplines, including industrial design (ID). UX field offers ID graduates extended professional possibilities, potentially appeasing the challenging conditions of the ID job market in Turkey. Although there are some educational efforts on getting prepared for a career in UX, how ID students perceive such a career path has not been investigated. For this purpose, this paper presents a survey study conducted with senior ID students to understand their perspectives regarding the likelihood of a career in UX. The findings outline the extent and reasons of their interest in UX, benefits of their educational background, and perceived readiness and individual efforts towards building a UX career. We discuss the potentials of ID background for UX, and present implications for design education and practice to better prepare students for a career in UX.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Assessment, Selection and Placement Centre. (2020). Student selection and placement system manuals. Resource document. Retrieved December 10, 2019, from www.osym.gov.tr. Bačíková, M. (2015). User experience design: Contrasting academic with practice. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on emerging eLearning technologies and applications (ICETA), Stary Smokovec, 26–27 November 2015 (pp. 1–6). IEEE. Bartlett, J. E., Kotrlik, J. W., & Higgins, C. C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning and Performance Journal, 19(1), 43–50. Budd, J., Taylor, R., Wakkary, R., & Evernden, D. (2003). Industrial design to experience design: Searching for new common ground. In B. Weller & G. Spellmeyer (Eds.), ICSID 2nd educational conference 2003 Hanover. (pp. 137–141). iF International Forum Design GmbH. Budd, J., & Wang, W. (2017). Industrial design education: Taming technology to enhance user experience. Archives of Design Research, 30(3), 17–27. Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. . Psychology Press. Erkarslan, Ö., Kaya, N., & Dilek, Ö. (2011). Comparative analysis of recruitment qualifications of industrial designers in Turkey through undergraduate education programs and online recruitment resources. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23, 129–145. Faiola, A., & Matei, S. A. (2010). Enhancing human–computer interaction design education: Teaching affordance design for emerging mobile devices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(3), 239–254. Getto, G., & Beecher, F. (2016). Toward a model of UX education: Training UX designers within the academy. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 59(2), 153–164. Getto, G., Potts, L., & Salvo, M. J. (2013). Teaching UX: Designing programs to train the next generation of UX experts. In SIGDOC2013: Proceedings of the 31st ACM international conference on design of communication, Greenville, 30 September–1 October 2013 (pp. 65–70). ACM. Gonzalez, C. A., Smith, M. A., & Youmans, R. J. (2017). Are human factors students prepared for careers in user experience research? A survey of predicted and actual skill utilization. In Proceedings of HFES2017 annual meeting (Vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 1101–1105). Gray, C. M. (2016). ‘It’s more of a mindset than a method’:UX practitioners’ conception of design methods. In CHI '16: Proceedings of the 34th annual CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, San Jose, 7–12 May 2016 (pp. 4044–4055). ACM. Hamurcu, A. (2014). Türkiye’de Kullanıcı Deneyimi Pratiği ile Endüstriyel Tasarımcıların İlişkisi Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Unpublished master’s thesis. Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul. İnal, Y., & Rızvanoğlu, K. (2016). Türkiye’deki Kullanıcı Deneyimi Profesyonellerinin Profili, Çalışma Ortamları, Kullandıkları Yöntemler ve Mevcut İş Akışı İçindeki Konumları. Galatasaray Üniversitesi İletişim Dergisi, 25, 181–207. Kaygan, P., Ilhan, A. O., & Oygür, I. (2020). Change in industrial designers’ jobs: The case of Turkey, 1984–2018. The Design Journal, 23(6), 821–841. Kındı, M. (2007). Türkiye’de Endüstriyel Tasarım İş Piyasası ve İstihdam Düzeyinde Temel Karakteristikleri. Unpublished master’s thesis. Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul. King, S., & Chang, K. (2016). Understanding industrial design: Principles for UX and interaction design. . O’Reilly. Kou, Y., & Gray, C. M. (2019). A practice-led account of the conceptual evolution of UX knowledge. In CHI 2019: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Glasgow, 4–9 May 2019 (pp. 1–13). ACM. Kou, Y., Gray, C. M., Toombs, A. L., & Adams, R. S. (2018). Knowledge production and social roles in an online community of emerging occupation: A study of user experience practitioners on reddit. In Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Hawai, 2–6 January 2018 (pp. 2068–2077). Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. (3rd ed.). Sage. Nielsen, J. (2017). A 100-year view of user experience. Nielsen Norman Group. Retrieved December 24, 2019, from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/100-years-ux/. Norman, D. (2010). Why design education must change. Core77. Retrieved November 26, 2019, from https://www.core77.com/posts/17993/why-design-education-must-change-17993. Nunnally, J. C., & Berstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. Paik, H., Kim, S., Ahn, S., Suh, H., Kang, H., Lee, E., Cho, H., & Wang, Q. (2019). Integrated perspectives in design: Issues and perspectives of design research, education, and practice. The Design Journal, 22(5), 581–605. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. (4th ed.). Sage. Peng, C. J., Lee, K. L., & Ingersoll, G. M. (2002). An introduction to logistic regression analysis and reporting. The Journal of Educational Research, 96(1), 3–14. Pett, M. A., Lackey, N. R., & Sullivan, J. J. (2003). Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. . Sage. Presidential Human Resources Office. (2019). Uni-veri: performance ranking of departments. resource document. Retrieved December 27, 2019, from https://www.cbiko.gov.tr/en/projects/uni-veri. Rodber, M., & Wormald, P. (2007). Aligning industrial design education to emerging trends in professional practice and industry. In E. Bohemia, K. Hilton, C. McMahon, & A. Clarke (Eds.), DS43: Proceedings of E &PDE 2007, the 9th international conference on engineering and product design education, University of Northumbria, Newcastle, 13–14 September 2007 (pp. 87–92). Hadleys. Rodgers, P. A. (2007). Polymath interpolators—The next generation of designers. In E. Bohemia, K. Hilton, C. McMahon, & A. Clarke (Eds.), DS43: Proceedings of E &PDE 2007, the 9th international conference on engineering and product design education, University of Northumbria, Newcastle, 13–14 September 2007 (pp. 375–380). Hadleys. Rosala, M., & Krause, R. (2019). User experience careers: What a career in UX looks like today. (2nd ed.). Nielsen Norman Group. Rose, E., Davidson, A., Agapie, E., & Sobel, K. (2016). Designing our future students: Introducing user experience to teens through a UCD charette. In SIGDOC '16: proceedings of the 34th ACM international conference on the design of communication, Silver Spring, 23–24 September 2016 (pp. 1–6). ACM. Rose, E., & Tenenberg, J. (2017). Making practice-level struggles visible: Researching UX practice to inform pedagogy. Communication Design Quarterly, 5(1), 89–97. Şener, B., & Pedgley, O. (2019). Accelerating students’ capability in design for interaction. In N.A.G.Z Börekçi, D. Özgen Koçyıldırım, F. Korkut, & D. Jones (Eds.), Proceedings of the DRS learn X design 2019: Insider knowledge, Ankara, 9–12 July 2019 (pp. 171–181). METU Department of Industrial Design. Talone, A. B., Basavaraj, P., & Wisniewski, P. J. (2017). Enhancing human–computer interaction and user experience education through a hybrid approach to experiential learning. In SIGITE '17: Proceedings of the 18th annual conference on information technology education, Rochester, 4–7 September 2017 (pp. 83–88). ACM. Töre Yargın, G., Günay, A., & Süner-Pla-Cerdà, S. (2019). UX modelling in design education: Methods, processes and examples. In N.A.G.Z Börekçi, D. Özgen Koçyıldırım, F. Korkut, & D. Jones (Eds.), Proceedings of the DRS learn X design 2019: Insider knowledge, Ankara, 9–12 July 2019 (pp. 139–152). METU Department of Industrial Design. Töre Yargın, G., Süner, S., & Günay, A. (2018). Modelling user experience: Integrating user experience research into design education. In Proceedings of the IADIS international conferences interfaces and human computer interaction, Madrid, 18–20 July 2018 (pp. 26–34). Underwood, G., & Conrad, F. (2019). Exploring the ongoing diversity issues embedded in product design. In N.A.G.Z Börekçi, D. Özgen Koçyıldırım, F. Korkut, & D. Jones (Eds.), Proceedings of the DRS learn X design 2019: Insider knowledge, Ankara, 9–12 July 2019 (pp. 321–330). METU Department of Industrial Design. Vorvoreanu, M., Gray, C. M., Parsons, P., & Rasche, N. (2017). Advancing UX education: A model for integrated studio pedagogy. In CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Denver, 6–11 May 2017 (pp. 1441–1446). ACM.