Industrial Policy in the United States

American Electronics Association, Attracting the Best and Brightest to the United States: Reforming High-Skilled Visa Policy, AeA Competitiveness Series Report. American Electronics Association: Washington, DC, 2006.

Association of American Universities AAU, National Defense Education and Innovation Initiative: Meeting America’s Economic and Security Challenges in the 21st Century. Association of American Universities: Washington, DC, 2006.

Biotechnology Industry Association BIO, Growing the Nation’s Bioscience Sector: State Bioscience Initiatives 2006, Prepared by the Battelle Technology Partnership Practice and SSTI. Biotechnology Industry Association: Washington, DC, 2006.

Braunerhjelm, P., Faini, R., Norman, V., Ruane, F., and Seabright, P., Integration and the Regions of Europe: How the Right Policies can Prevent Polarization. CEPR: London, 2000.

Broad, W.J., U.S. is Losing Its Dominance in the Sciences. New York Times, 2004, May 3.

Business Roundtable, Tapping America’s Potential. Business Roundtable: Washington, DC, 2005.

Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century: An Agenda for American Science and Technology, Rising above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Future. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine: Washington, DC, 2006.

Council on Competitiveness, Innovate America—National Innovation Initiative Report. Council on Competitiveness: Washington, DC, 2004.

Council on Competitiveness, Competitiveness Index 2006: Where America Stands. Council on Competitiveness: Washington, DC, 2006.

Council on Competitiveness, M. E. Porter, Monitor Company, Cluster of Innovation-Initiative: San Diego. Council on Competitiveness: Washington, DC, 2001.

Curtis, M.R., The Innovation of Energy Technologies and the US National Innovation System—The Case of the Advanced Turbine System. U.S. Department of Energy: Washington, DC, 2003.

Destler, I.M., American Trade Politics, 4th edition. Institute for International Economics: Washington, DC, 2005.

Domestic Policy Council/Office of Science and Technology Policy, American Competitiveness Initiative. Domestic Policy Council/Office of Science and Technology: The White House, Washington, DC, 2006.

Drabenstott, M., A Review of the Federal Role in Regional Economic Development. Center for the Study of Rural America, Kansas City: Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 2005.

Fong, G.R., Breaking New Grounds or Breaking the Rules, in International Security, vol. 25, no.2, pp. 152–186, 2000 (Fall).

Gadzey, A., Thompson, H., and Yeboah, O., Industrial Subsidies in Alabama: Economic Impact Across Counties, in Southern Business & Economics Journal, 2007 (in press).

General Accounting Office, Community Development: Federal Revitalization Programs are Being Implemented, but Data on the Use of Tax Benefits are Limited, GAO-04-306. General Accounting Office: Washington, DC, 2004.

General Accounting Office, Federal Research: Observations on the Small Business Innovation Research Program, GAO-05-861T. General Accounting Office: Washington, DC, 2005a.

General Accounting Office, Advanced Technology Program: Inherent Factors in Selection Process are Likely to Limit Identification of Similar Research, GAO-05-759T. General Accounting Office: Washington, DC, 2005b.

Graham, E. and Marchick, D., US National Security and Foreign Direct Investment. Institute for International Economics: Washington, DC, 2006.

Gresser, E., Weinstein, P., and Marshall, W., Raising our Game: A National Competition Strategy, The 2006 Progressive Policy Institute report. Progressive Policy Institute: Washington, DC, 2006.

Gurbaxani, I., Industriepolitik in den Vereinigten Staaten. Nomos Verlag: Baden-Baden, 2000.

Hill, C., “Developments in the Federal Science and Technology Policies in the United States,” in Shapira, P., Kuhlmann, S. (eds.), Learning from Science and Technology Policy Evaluation—Experiences from the United States and Europe. Edward Elgar: Chatenham, 2003.

Hill, K., Universities in the U.S. National Innovation System Productivity and Prosperity Project, Tempe, 2006.

Hufbauer, G.C., The Foreign Sales Corporation Drama: Reaching the Last Act? IIE International Economics Policy Briefs. Intitute of International Economics: Washington, DC, 2002.

Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness (ISC), Cluster Mapping Project, database available at www.isc.hbs.edu/cmp accessed 10 December 2006.

Jaffe, A. and Lerner, J., Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken Patent System is Endangering Innovation and Progress. Princeton University Press: Princeton, 2004.

Ketels, C., Mobilizing the Economic Potential of Science—A Comparison Between Germany and the United States. Humboldt Institution for Transatlantic Issues: Berlin, 2004.

Ketels, C. and Sölvell, Ö., Clusters in the 10 New EU Member Countries. European Commission—DG Enterprise and Industry: Brussels, 2006.

Krugman, P., Geography and Trade. MIT Press: Cambridge, 1991.

Lindqvist, G., Sölvell, Ö., and Ketels, C., The Cluster Initiative Greenbook. Ivory Tower AB: Stockholm, 2003.

Midelfart-Knarvik, K.H., Overman, H.G., Redding, S.J., and Venables, A.J., The Location of European Industry, Economic Papers Number 142. European Commission—DG Economic and Financial Affairs: Brussels, 2000.

National Association of State Budget Officers (NASBO), 2005 State Expenditure Report, NASBO: Washington, D.C., 2006.

National Governors Association, Center for Best Practices, Enhancing Competitiveness: A Review of Recent State Economic Development Initiatives. National Governors Association: Washington, DC, 2005.

National Science Board, Fulfilling the Promise. National Science Board: Washington, DC, 2003.

National Science Foundation, Science and Engineering Indicators 2006. National Science Foundation: Arlington, 2006.

OECD, Policies for Industrial Development and Competitiveness. Working Paper DSTI/IND(97)28/FINAL. OECD: Paris, 1998.

OECD, Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2002—Country Response to Policy Questionnaire, United States. OECD: Paris, 2002a.

OECD, Small and Medium Enterprise Outlook. OECD: Paris, 2002b.

OECD, Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2004. OECD: Paris, 2004a.

OECD, Recent Tax Policy Trends and Reforms in OECD Countries–No. 9. OECD: Paris, 2004b.

OECD, Science, Technology, and Industry Outlook, OECD: Paris, 2006.

Paytas, J., Gradeck, R., and Andrews, L., Universities and the Development of Industry Clusters, Prepared for the Economic Development Administration (EDA). US Department of Commerce: Washington, DC, 2004.

Porter, M.E., The Economic Performance of Regions, Regional Studies, vol. 37, nos. 6 & 7, pp. 549–578, 2003 (August/October).

Porter, M.E., The Competitive Advantage of Nations. The Free Press: New York, 1990.

Porter, M.E , Ketels, C., Miller, K., and Bryden, R., Competitiveness in Rural U.S. Regions: Learning and Research Agenda, Prepared for the Economic Development Administration (EDA). US Department of Commerce: Washington, DC, 2004 (April).

Porter, M.E., Delgado, M., and Ketels, C., The Microeconomic Foundations of Prosperity: Findings from the Business Competitiveness Index, in World Economic Forum, The Global Competitiveness Report, Palgrave MacMillan, 2006 (September).

Quillen, C., Innovation and Standards for Patentability, in FTC/DOJ Hearings on Competition and Intellectual Property Law in the Knowledge-Based Economy, Washington, DC, 2002 (July).

Schott, J., Free Trade Agreements: US Policies and Priorities. Institute for International Economics: Washington, DC, 2004 (April).

Shapira, P., “Evaluating Manufacturing Extension Services in the United States”, in P. Shapira, S. Kuhlmann (eds.), Learning from Science and Technology Policy Evaluation—Experiences from the United States and Europe. Edward Elgar: Chatenham, 2003.

Shapira, P., “Systems for Supporting Small Business in the United States: Insights and Challenges from State Programs in Georgia”, in N. Kojima (ed.), Supporting Systems for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the United States. Japan Institute of Labour: Tokyo, 2001.

Strengthening Americas Communities Advisory Committee (SACAC), Report Submitted to Secretary of Commerce Carlos M. Gutierez. SACAC: Washington, DC, 2005 (July).

Task Force on the Future of American Innovation, Benchmarks of our Innovation Future, Task Force on the Future of American Innovation: Washington, D.C., 2006.

U.S. Department of Commerce, Manufacturing in America. U.S. Department of Commerce: Washington, DC, 2004 (January).

Ward, A., US states become addicted to use of economic sweeteners. Financial Times, 2006 (23 March).

White House, A New Generation of American Innovation. White House: Washington, DC, 2004 (April).

White House Office of Management and Budget, President Bush Proposes Strengthening America’s Communities Initiative. White House Office of Management and Budget: Washington, DC, 2005a (3 February).

White House Office of Management and Budget, FY 2006 Budget Priorities, White House Office of Management and Budget: Washington, DC, 2005b (January).

White House Office of Management and Budget, Overview of the President’s 2006 Budget. White House Office of Management and Budget: Washington, DC, 2005c.

World Trade Organization, Trade Policy Review United States. World Trade Organization: Geneva, 2006.