Induction of labour with a viable infant: a randomised clinical trial comparing intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal dinoprostone

Committee on Obstetrics. Induction of labor. Washington: American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists, 1995. ACOG Technical Bulletin No. 217. Goffinet, 1999, Enquête de pratique nationale après des obstétriciens sur le déclenchement artificiel du travail, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, 28, 319 Williams, 1985, Use of prostaglandin E2 topical cervical gel in high risk patients: a critical analysis, Obstet Gynecol, 66, 769 Rayburn, 1989, PGE2 gel for cervical ripening and induction of labor: a critical analysis, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 160, 529, 10.1016/S0002-9378(89)80020-1 Keirse, 1993, Prostaglandins in preinduction cervical ripening: meta-analysis of worldwide clinical experience, J Reprod Med, 38, 89 Wing, 1995, A comparison of misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 172, 1804, 10.1016/0002-9378(95)91415-3 Wing, 1995, Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 172, 1811, 10.1016/0002-9378(95)91416-1 Chuck, 1995, Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel (prepidil gel): randomized comparison, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 173, 1137, 10.1016/0002-9378(95)91340-8 Varaklis, 1995, Randomized Controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labor at term, Obstet Gynecol, 86, 541 Mundle, 1996, Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial, Obstet Gynecol, 88, 521, 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00220-7 Gottschall, 1997, A randomised clinical trial comparing misoprostol with prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 177, 1067, 10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70016-4 Buser, 1997, A randomised comparison between misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction in patients with unfavorable cervices, Obstet Gynecol, 89, 581, 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00015-X Sanchez-Ramos, 1998, Induction with prostaglandin E1 misoprostol compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: a randomised trial, Obstet Gynecol, 91, 401, 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00673-X Kolderup, 1999, Misoprostol is more efficacious for labor induction than prostaglandin E2, but is it associated with more risk?, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 180, 1543, 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70050-5 Danielian, 1999, Misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 106, 793, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08399.x Nunes, 1999, Randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labor, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 181, 626, 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70503-X Fletcher, 1994, Intravaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone as cervical ripening and labor-inducing agents, Obstet Gynecol, 83, 244 Surbek, 1997, A double-blind comparison of the safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 to induce labor, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 177, 1018, 10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70006-1 Wing, 1997, A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 177, 612, 10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70154-6 Drummond, 1996, Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submission to the BMJ. The BMJ Economic Evaluation Working Party, BMJ, 313, 275, 10.1136/bmj.313.7052.275 Hofmeyr, 1999, Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 106, 798, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08400.x