Individual participant data meta-analyses should not ignore clustering

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology - Tập 66 - Trang 865-873.e4 - 2013
Ghada Abo-Zaid1, Boliang Guo2, Jonathan J. Deeks3, Thomas P.A. Debray4, Ewout W. Steyerberg5, Karel G.M. Moons4, Richard David Riley3
1European Centre for Environment and Human Health, Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Exeter, Knowledge Spa, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, Cornwall TR1 3HD, UK
2Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Community Health Sciences, The University of Nottingham, Sir Colin Campbell Building, Jubilee Campus, Wollaton Road, Nottingham NG8 1BB, UK
3Public Health, Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Health and Population Sciences, The Public Health Building, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
4Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
5Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Tài liệu tham khảo

Riley, 2010, Meta-analysis of individual participant data: conduct, rationale and reporting, BMJ, 340, c221, 10.1136/bmj.c221 Stewart, 1993, Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference?, Lancet, 341, 418, 10.1016/0140-6736(93)93004-K Stewart, 2002, To IPD or not to IPD? Advantages and disadvantages of systematic reviews using individual patient data, Eval Health Prof, 25, 76, 10.1177/0163278702025001006 Simmonds, 2005, Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials: a review of methods used in practice, Clin Trials, 2, 209, 10.1191/1740774505cn087oa Turner, 2000, A multilevel model framework for meta-analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes, Stat Med, 19, 3417, 10.1002/1097-0258(20001230)19:24<3417::AID-SIM614>3.0.CO;2-L Higgins, 2001, Meta-analysis of continuous outcome data from individual patients, Stat Med, 20, 2219, 10.1002/sim.918 Whitehead, 2001, Meta-analysis of ordinal outcomes using individual patient data, Stat Med, 20, 2243, 10.1002/sim.919 Tudur-Smith, 2005, Investigating heterogeneity in an individual patient data meta-analysis of time to event outcomes, Stat Med, 24, 1307, 10.1002/sim.2050 Jones, 2009, Meta-analysis of individual patient data versus aggregate data from longitudinal clinical trials, Clin Trials, 6, 16, 10.1177/1740774508100984 Riley, 2008, Meta-analysis of continuous outcomes combining individual patient data and aggregate data, Stat Med, 27, 1870, 10.1002/sim.3165 Riley, 2008, Meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies using individual patient data and aggregate data, Stat Med, 27, 6111, 10.1002/sim.3441 Olkin, 1998, Comparison of meta-analysis versus analysis of variance of individual patient data, Biometrics, 54, 317, 10.2307/2534018 Mathew, 1999, On the equivalence of meta-analysis using literature and using individual patient data, Biometrics, 55, 1221, 10.1111/j.0006-341X.1999.01221.x Tudur Smith, 2007, A comparison of methods for fixed effects meta-analysis of individual patient data with time to event outcomes, Clin Trials, 4, 621, 10.1177/1740774507085276 Matthew, 2010, Comparison of one-step and two-step meta-analysis models using individual patient data, Biometrical J, 52, 271 Stijnen, 2010, Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data, Stat Med, 29, 3046, 10.1002/sim.4040 Hamza, 2008, The binomial distribution of meta-analysis was preferred to model within-study variability, J Clin Epidemiol, 61, 41, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.016 Abo-Zaid, 2012, Individual participant data meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies: state of the art?, BMC Med Res Methodol, 12, 56, 10.1186/1471-2288-12-56 Whitehead, 2002 DerSimonian, 1986, Meta-analysis in clinical trials, Control Clin Trials, 7, 177, 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 Sterne, 2009 Bradburn, 2007, Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta-analytical methods with rare events, Stat Med, 26, 53, 10.1002/sim.2528 Hukkelhoven, 2003, Patient age and outcome following severe traumatic brain injury: an analysis of 5600 patients, J Neurosurg, 99, 666, 10.3171/jns.2003.99.4.0666 Carlsson, 1968, Factors affecting the clinical course of patients with severe head injuries. 1. Influence of biological factors. 2. Significance of posttraumatic coma, J Neurosurg, 29, 242, 10.3171/jns.1968.29.3.0242 Kraaijenhagen, 2002, Simplification of the diagnostic management of suspected deep vein thrombosis, Arch Intern Med, 162, 907, 10.1001/archinte.162.8.907 Toll, 2006, Excluding deep vein thrombosis safely in primary care, J Fam Pract, 55, 613 Anderson, 2003, Combined use of clinical assessment and d-dimer to improve the management of patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected deep vein thrombosis (the EDITED Study), J Thromb Haemost, 1, 645, 10.1046/j.1538-7836.2003.00131.x Stevens, 2004, Withholding anticoagulation after a negative result on duplex ultrasonography for suspected symptomatic deep venous thrombosis, Ann Intern Med, 140, 985, 10.7326/0003-4819-140-12-200406150-00007 Wells, 2003, Evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of suspected deep-vein thrombosis, N Engl J Med, 349, 1227, 10.1056/NEJMoa023153 Toll, 2008, A new diagnostic rule for deep vein thrombosis: safety and efficiency in clinically relevant subgroups, Fam Pract, 25, 3, 10.1093/fampra/cmm075 Rice, 2001, Nursing interventions for smoking cessation, Cochrane Database Syst Rev (Complete Reviews), CD001188 Altman, 2002, Meta-analysis, Simpson's paradox, and the number needed to treat, BMC Med Res Methodol, 2, 3, 10.1186/1471-2288-2-3 Peters, 2003, Comparison of methods for analysing cluster randomized trials: an example involving a factorial design, Int J Epidemiol, 32, 840, 10.1093/ije/dyg228 Bland, 2004, Cluster randomised trials in the medical literature: two bibliometric surveys, BMC Med Res Methodol, 4, 21, 10.1186/1471-2288-4-21 Lee, 2005, The use of random effects models to allow for clustering in individually randomized trials, Clin Trials, 2, 163, 10.1191/1740774505cn082oa Steyerberg, 2000, Clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction: should we adjust for baseline characteristics?, Am Heart J, 139, 745, 10.1016/S0002-8703(00)90001-2 Hernández, 2004, Covariate adjustment in randomized controlled trials with dichotomous outcomes increases statistical power and reduces sample size requirements, J Clin Epidemiol, 57, 454, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.09.014 Turner, 2012, Covariate adjustment increased power in randomized controlled trials: an example in traumatic brain injury, J Clin Epidemiol, 65, 474, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.08.012 Robinson, 1991, Some surprising results about covariate adjustment in logistic regression models, Int Stat Rev, 58, 227, 10.2307/1403444 Greenland, 1999, Confounding and collapsibility in causal inference, Stat Sci, 14, 29, 10.1214/ss/1009211805 Gail, 1984, Biased estimates of treatment effect in randomized experiments with nonlinear regressions and omitted covariates, Biometrika, 71, 431, 10.1093/biomet/71.3.431 Mantel, 1959, Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease, J Natl Cancer Inst, 22, 719 Yusuf, 1985, Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: an overview of the randomized trials, Prog Cardiovasc Dis, 17, 335, 10.1016/S0033-0620(85)80003-7 Chu, 2006, Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with sparse data: a generalized linear mixed model approach, J Clin Epidemiol, 59, 1331, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.06.011 Ahmed, 2012, Assessment of publication bias, selection bias and unavailable data in meta-analyses using individual participant data: a database survey, BMJ, 344, d7762, 10.1136/bmj.d7762 Riley, 2007, Evidence synthesis combining individual patient data and aggregate data: a systematic review identified current practice and possible methods, J Clin Epidemiol, 60, 431, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.09.009 Jackson, 2009, Systematically missing confounders in individual participant data meta-analysis of observational cohort studies, Stat Med, 28, 1218, 10.1002/sim.3540