Individual and social fides: the contribution of Reformation to the ontology of economics

International Review of Economics - Tập 66 - Trang 293-304 - 2019
Emilio Di Somma1
1Mugnano Di Napoli, Italy

Tóm tắt

This essay wishes to address what is believed to be a central historical crossroad that allowed the development of economics, and other social sciences, in the modern era. Such development would not have been possible without the transformation of the fundamental ontology through which European and Christian societies understood the world around them and their own social structures. I identify the turning point of such transformation, as other scholars, philosophers and social scientists have done, with the Reformation, which was the center and cause of major cultural, political and scientific development. Philosophers and social scientists have developed such interpretation of the Reformation as the historical event in which the cultural and political landscape of western civilization has been utterly transformed. My interest in the Reformation as a religious, political and cultural upheaval lies in the fact that I identify Luther’s reforms not only as a shift in the landscape of political/religious authorities of the time, but also as a crucial moment in which the ontological landscape of western civilization has been radically changed. I am of the belief that the fundamental, ontological, assumptions of economics are based on the ontological revolution represented by Luther’s theology, and Reformation more generally, in a fundamental way. Such that economics would be unthinkable without the Reformation.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Agamben G (2011) The kingdom and the glory, by L. Chiesa. Stanford University Press, Stanford Blumenberg H (1983) The legitimacy of the modern age, by Robert M. Wallace. The MIT Press, Cambridge Brandt WI, Lehmann HT (1962) Luther’s works. In: Brandt WI, Lehmann HT (ed) The Christian in society, vol 45. Fortress, Philadelphia Butterworth R (1977) Hippolytus of Rome. In: Butterworth R (ed) Contra Noetum. Heythrop College (University of London), London Cavanaugh WT (2008) Being consumed: economics and Christian desire. William B. Eerdmans Publishing, Cambridge Cavanaugh WT (2009) The myth of religious violence. Secular ideology and the root of modern conflict. Oxford University Press, Oxford Ernesto DM (2007) Il Mondo Magico; Prolegomeni ad una Storia del Magismo. Bollati Boringhieri, Torino Foucault M (2007) Security, territory, population: lectures at the College de France, 1977–78, by Michel Senellart, François Ewald, Alessandro Fontana. Palgrave Macmillan Publisher, Basingstoke Fransens P (1985) A short history of the formula “Fides et Mores”, Hermeneutics of the Councils and other studies, by Mertens and de Graeve. Leuven University Press, Leuven, pp 287–318 Lull TF (1989) Martin Luther’s basic theological writings. Fortress Press, Minneapolis Luther M (1796) A commentary on the Galatians, by Martin Luther with the life of the author, Chester. Eighteenth Century Collections Online. University of Aberdeen, Gale Luther M (2005) Faith alone. In: Galvin JC (ed) Zondervan Nelson RH (2001) Economics as religion: from Samuelson to Chicago and beyond. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park Rössner PR (2015a) Martin Luther on commerce and usury. Anthem, London Rössner PR (2015b) Luther—Ein tüchtiger Ökonom? Über die monetären Ursprünge der Deutschen Reformation. Zeitschrift für Historische Forschung 42(2):37–74 Rössner P (2016) Burying money? Monetary origins and afterlives of Luther’s reformation. Hist Polit Econ 48(2):225–263 Scarpat G (1959) Tertullian. In: Scarpat G (ed) Adversus Praxean. Loescher, Torino Stagaman D (2003) Piet Fransen’s research on Fides et Mores. Theol Stud 64:69–77 Taylor C (2007) A secular age. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, London Ugilt R (2014) Giorgio Agamben: political philosophy. Humanities-Ebooks LLP, Tirril, Penrith Weber M (2005) The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Routledge, London Weijers O (1977) Some notes on Fides and related words in medieval latin. Archivum Latinitatis medii aevi 40:77–102