Indirect nontarget effects of host-specific biological control agents: Implications for biological control

Allee, 1949 Blossey, 1996, A biological weed control program using insects against purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) in North America, 351 Briese, 2004, Weed biological control: applying the science to solve seemingly intractable problems, Aust. J. Entomol., 43, 304, 10.1111/j.1326-6756.2004.00442.x Briese, D.T., 2003. The centrifugal phylogenetic method used to select plants for host-specificity testing of weed biological control agents: can and should it be modernized? In: Spafford-Jacob, H.S., Briese, D.T. (Eds.), Improving the Selection, Testing and Evaluation of Weed Biological Control Agents. CRC for Australian Weed Management, Tech. Ser. 7, pp. 23–34. Briese, 2002, A strategy for the biological control of blue heliotrope (Heliotropium amplexicaule), 394 Briese, 2002, A strategy for the biological control of Onopordum spp. Thistles in south-eastern Australia, Biocontrol Sci. Tech., 12, 121, 10.1080/09583150120110707 Callaway, 1999, Biological-control herbivores increase competitive ability of Centaurea maculosa, Ecology, 80, 1196, 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1196:BCHMIC]2.0.CO;2 Callaway, 2001, Compensatory growth and competitive ability of and invasive weed are enhanced by soil fungi and native neighbors, Ecol. Lett., 4, 1, 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00251.x Childs, 1994, Serologic and genetic identification of Peromyscus maniculatus as the primary rodent reservoir for a new hantavirus in the southwestern United States, J. Infect. Dis., 169, 1271, 10.1093/infdis/169.6.1271 Colautti, 2004, Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis, Ecol. Lett., 7, 721, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00616.x Crawley, 1989, Insect herbivores and plant population dynamics, Annu. Rev. Entomol., 34, 531, 10.1146/annurev.en.34.010189.002531 Crawley, 1997 DeBach, 1976, Evaluation of the impact of natural enemies, 255 DeLoach, 1991, Past successes and current prospects in biological control of weeds in the United States and Canada, Nat. Areas J., 11, 129 DeLoach, 2000, Ecological interactions in the biological control of saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) in the United States: toward a new understanding, 819 Denoth, 2002, Multiple agents in biological control: improving the odds?, Biol. Control, 24, 20, 10.1016/S1049-9644(02)00002-6 Ehler, 1982, Evidence for competitive exclusion of introduced natural enemies in biological control, Environ. Entomol., 11, 1, 10.1093/ee/11.1.1 Follett, 2000 Forno, 2000, Success in biological control of aquatic weeds by arthopods, 159 Frank, 1998, How risky is biological control?, Comment. Ecol., 79, 1829, 10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[1829:HRIBCC]2.0.CO;2 Gerlach, 2003, Testing life history correlates of invasiveness using congeneric plant species, Ecol. Appl., 13, 167, 10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0167:TLHCOI]2.0.CO;2 Goeden, 1986, Commments on a proposed “new” approach for selecting agents for the biological control of weeds, Can. Entomol., 118, 51, 10.4039/Ent11851-1 Goeden, 1976, Biotic interference with insects imported for weed control, Annu. Rev. Entomol., 21, 325, 10.1146/annurev.en.21.010176.001545 Gurr, 2000 Hamilton, 2001, Can plants stimulate soil microbes and their own nutrient supply?, Ecology, 82, 2397, 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[2397:CPSSMA]2.0.CO;2 Hajek, 2004 Harris, 1980, Effects of Urophora affinis Frfld. and U . quadrifasciata (Meig.) (Diptera: Tephritidae) on Centaurea diffusa Lam. and C. maculosa Lam. (Compositae), Z. Angew. Entomol., 90, 190, 10.1111/j.1439-0418.1980.tb03518.x Harris, 1990, Environmental impact of introduced biological control agents, 289 Harris, 1991, Invitation paper (C.P. Alexander fund): classical biocontrol of weeds: its definition, selection of effective agents, and administrative-political problems, Can. Entomol., 123, 827, 10.4039/Ent123827-4 Hinz, 2005, Comparing invasive plants from their native and exotic range: what we can learn for biological control?, Weed Technol., 18, 1533, 10.1614/0890-037X(2004)018[1533:CIPFTN]2.0.CO;2 Hokkanen, 1984, New approach for selecting biological control agents, Can. Entomol., 116, 1109, 10.4039/Ent1161109-8 Hoddle, 2004, Restoring balance: using exotic species to control invasive exotic species, Conserv. Biol., 18, 38, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00249.x Hoddle, 2004, The strength of biological control in the battle against invasive pests: a reply, Conserv. Biol., 18, 38, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00249.x Holt, 1977, Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities, Theor. Pop. Biol., 12, 197, 10.1016/0040-5809(77)90042-9 Holt, 2001, Indirect interactions, community modules and biological control: a theoretical perspective, 13 Howarth, 1991, Environmental impacts of classical biological control, Annu. Rev. Entomol., 36, 485, 10.1146/annurev.en.36.010191.002413 Huffaker, 1959, A ten-year study of vegetational changes associated with biological control of Klamath weed, J. Range Manage., 12, 69, 10.2307/3894934 Islam, 1983, Compensation and regrowth in ragwort (Senecio jacobaea) attacked by cinnabar moth (Tyria jacobaeae), J. Ecol., 71, 829, 10.2307/2259596 Julien, 1998 Julien, 1987, Effects of adult and larval Cyrtobagous salviniae on the floating weed Salvinia molesta, J. Appl. Ecol., 24, 935, 10.2307/2403990 Katovich, 1999, Effect of Galerucella spp. on survival of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) roots and crowns, Weed Sci., 47, 360, 10.1017/S0043174500091906 Keane, 2002, Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis, Trends Ecol. Evol., 4, 164, 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02499-0 Kluge, 1990, Prospects for the biological control of triffid weed, Chromolaena odorata, in South Africa, S. Afr. J. Sci., 86, 229 Lang, 2000, Release and establishment of diffuse and spotted knapweed biocontrol agents by USDA, APHIS, PPQ, in the United States, Pan-Pac. Entomol., 76, 197 Landis, 2003, Establishment and impact of Galerucella calmariensis L. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on Lythrum salicaria L. and associated plant communities in Michigan, Biol. Control, 28, 78, 10.1016/S1049-9644(03)00055-0 Louda, 2003, Invasiveness of some biological control insects and adequacy of their ecological risk assessment and regulation, Conserv. Biol., 17, 73, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02020.x Louda, 1997, Ecological effects of an insect introduced for the biological control of weeds, Science, 277, 1088, 10.1126/science.277.5329.1088 Louda, 2004, The double-edged sword of biological control in conservation and restoration, Conserv. Biol., 18, 50, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00070.x Maddox, 1982, Biological control of diffuse knapweed (Centaurea diffusa) and spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosa), Weed Sci., 30, 76, 10.1017/S0043174500026217 McClay, A., Balciunas, J.K., 2005 The role of pre-release efficacy assessment in selecting classical biological control agents for weeds—applying the Anna Karenina principle. Biol. Control xx: xxx-xxx. McEvoy, 1996, Host specificity and biological pest control, BioScience, 46, 401, 10.2307/1312873 McEvoy, 1999, Biological control of plant invaders: regional patterns, field experiments, and structured population models, Ecol. Appl., 9, 387, 10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0387:BCOPIR]2.0.CO;2 McEvoy, 2000, Why things bite back: unintended consequences of biological weed control, 167 McEvoy, 1993, Disturbance, competition, and herbivory effects on ragwort Senecio jacobaea populations, Ecol. Monogr., 63, 55, 10.2307/2937123 McFadyen, 1998, Biological control of weeds, Annu. Rev. Entomol., 43, 369, 10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.369 McFadyen, R.E., 2003. Does ecology help in the selection of biocontrol agents? In: Spafford-Jacob, H.S., Briese, D.T. (Eds.). Improving the Selection, Testing and Evaluation of Weed Biological Control Agents. CRC for Australian Weed Management, Tech. Ser. 7, pp. 5–10. Moore, 1987 Müller, 1989, Growth pattern of diploid and tetraploid spotted knapweed, Centaurea maculosa Lam. (Compositae) and effects of the root mining moth Agapeta zoegana (L.) (Lepidoptera:Cochylidae), Weed Res., 29, 103, 10.1111/j.1365-3180.1989.tb00847.x Müller-Shärer, 1991, The impact of root herbivory as a function of plant density and competition, survival, growth, and fecundity of Centaurea maculosa in field plots, J. Appl. Ecol., 28, 759, 10.2307/2404206 Müller-Shärer, 1993, The biological control of Centaurea spp. in North America: do insects solve the problem?, Pestic. Sci., 37, 343, 10.1002/ps.2780370407 Müller, 1990, Parasitoids acquired by Coleophora parthenica (Lepidoptera: Coleophoridae) ten years after its introduction into southern California for the biological control of Russian thistle, Entomophaga, 35, 257, 10.1007/BF02374801 Myers, 1985, How many insects are necessary for successful biological control of weeds, 77 Myers, 1989, How many insect species are necessary for biological control of insects?, Environ. Entomol., 18, 541, 10.1093/ee/18.4.541 Myers, 2000, Why reduced seed production is not necessarily translated into successful weed biological control, 569 Nuessly, 1984, Rodent predation on larvae of Coleophora parthenica (Lepidoptera: Coleophoridae), a moth imported for the biological control of Russian thistle, Environ. Entomol., 13, 502, 10.1093/ee/13.2.502 Ortega, 2004, Effects of exotic plant invasion and introduced biological control agents on native deer mouse populations, Ecol. Appl., 14, 241, 10.1890/02-5276 Pearson, 2003, Indirect effects of host-specific biological control agents, Trends Ecol. Evol., 18, 456, 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00188-5 Pearson, 2000, Non-target effects of an introduced biological control agent on deer mouse ecology, Oecologia, 122, 121, 10.1007/PL00008828 Pemberton, 2000, Predictable risk to native plants in weed biological control, Oecologia, 125, 489, 10.1007/s004420000477 Pimentel, 1963, Introducing parasites and predators to control native pests, Can. Entomol., 95, 785, 10.4039/Ent95785-8 Pratt, 2003, Predation by phytoseiid mites on Tetranychus linearius (Acari: Tetranychidae), an established weed biological control agent of gorse (Ulex europaeus), Biol. Control, 26, 40, 10.1016/S1049-9644(02)00114-7 Ramsell, 1993, When grazed by Tipula paludosa, Lolium perenne is a stronger competitor of Rumex obtusifolius, J. Ecol., 81, 777, 10.2307/2261675 Reimer, 1988, Predation on Liothrips urichi Karny (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae): a case of biotic interference, Environ. Entomol., 17, 132, 10.1093/ee/17.1.132 Ridenour, 2003, Root herbivores, pathogenic fungi, and competition between Centaurea maculosa and Festuca idahoensis, Plant Ecol., 169, 161, 10.1023/A:1026277401640 Sebolt, 2004, Arthropod predators of Galerucella calmariensis L. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): an assessment of biotic interference, Environ. Entomol., 33, 356, 10.1603/0046-225X-33.2.356 Sheppard, A.W., 2003. Prioritizing agents based on predicted efficacy: beyond the lottery approach. In: Spafford-Jacob, H.S., Briese, D.T. (Eds.) Improving the Selection, Testing and Evaluation of Weed Biological Control Agents. CRC for Australian Weed Management, Tech. Ser. 7, pp. 11–22. Siemens, 2002, The cost of defense in the context of competition. Brassica rapa may grow and defend, Ecology, 83, 505, 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[0505:CODITC]2.0.CO;2 Simberloff, 1996, How risky is biological control?, Ecology, 7, 1965, 10.2307/2265693 Sogge, M.K., 2000. Breeding season ecology. In: Finch, D.M., Stoleson, S.H. (Eds) Status, Ecology, and Conservation of the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-60, pp. 57–70. Stanley, A.G., 2005. Evaluating the effectiveness of biological control: spotted knapweed, seed head gallflies, predacious mice, and environmental variation. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. Steinger, 1992, Physiological and growth responses of Centaurea maculosa (Asteraceae) to root herbivory under varying levels of interspecific competition and soil nitrogen availability, Oecologia, 91, 141, 10.1007/BF00317253 Story, 1991, Metzneria paucipunctella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) a moth introduced against spotted knapweed its feeding strategy and impact on two introduced Urophora spp. (Diptera: Techritididae), Can. Entomol., 123, 1001, 10.4039/Ent1231001-5 Story, 1995, Cause and extent of predation on Urophora spp. larvae (Diptera: Tephritidae) in spotted knapweed capitula, Environ. Entomol., 24, 1467, 10.1093/ee/24.6.1467 Strong, 2000, Biological control of invading species-risk and reform, Science, 288, 1969, 10.1126/science.288.5473.1969 Syrett, 2000, Success in biological control of terrestrial weeds by arthopods, 189 Trumble, 1993, Plant compensation for herbivory, Annu. Rev. Ent., 38, 93, 10.1146/annurev.en.38.010193.000521 Van den Bosch, 1973 Van Driesche, 1996 Wang, 2003, Intra- and interspecific competition by Fopius arisanus and Diachasmimorpha tryoni (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), parasitoids of tephritid fruit flies, Biol. Control, 27, 251, 10.1016/S1049-9644(03)00027-6 Wapshere, 1974, A strategy for evaluating the safety of organisms for biological weed control, Ann. Appl. Biol., 77, 201, 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1974.tb06886.x Wajnberg, 2001 Williamson, 1996 Woodburn, 1996, Interspecific competition between Rhinocyllus conicus and Urophora solstitialis, two biocontrol agents released in Australia against Carduus nutans, 409