Indirect methods of large-scale forest biomass estimation

European Journal of Forest Research - Tập 126 Số 2 - Trang 197-207 - 2007
Z. Somogyi1, Emil Cienciala2, Raisa Mäkipää3, Petteri Muukkonen3, Aleksi Lehtonen3, Peter Weiß4
1Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy
2Institute of Forest Ecosystem Research (IFER), Jilove ú Prahy, Czech Republic
3Finnish Forest Research Institute (Metla), Helsinki, Finland
4Department of Terrestrial Ecology, Umweltbundesamt Wien, Vienna, Austria

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Araújo TM, Higuchi N, Carvalho JA Jr (1999) Comparison of formulae for biomass-content determination in a tropical rain forest site in the state of Pará, Brazil. For Ecol Manage 117:43–52

Baskerville GL (1972) Use of logarithmic regression in the estimation of plant biomass. Can J For 2:49–53

Brown S, Lugo AE (1984) Biomassof tropical forests: a new estimate based on forest volumes. Science 223:1290–1293

Cannell MGR (1982) World forest biomass and primary production data. Academic, London

Eamus D, McGuinness K, Burrows W (2000) Review of allometric relationships for estimating woody biomass for Queensland, the Northern Territory and Western Australia, National Carbon Accounting System technical report 5A. Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, 56 pp

Fang J-Y, Chen A, Peng C, Zhao S, Ci L (2001) Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in China between 1949 and 1998. Science 292:2320–2322

FCCC/SBSTA/2004/INF.7 (2004) Estimation of emissions and removals in land-use change and forestry and issues relating to projections. Note by the secretariat. http://www.unfccc.int

Hakkila P (1979) Wood density and dry weight tables for pine, spruce and birch stems in Finland. Commun Inst For Fenn 96(3):1–59

Haripriya GS (2000) Estimates of biomass in Indian forests. Biomass Bioenergy 19:245–258

IPCC (2003) Good practice guidance for land use, land-use change and forestry. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Hayama, ISBN 4-88788-003-0

Jalkanen A, Mäkipää R, Ståhl G, Lehtonen A, Petersson H (2005) Estimation of biomass stock of trees in Sweden: comparison of biomass equations and age-dependent biomass expansion factors. Ann For Sci 62(8):845–851

Jenkins JC, Chojnacky DC, Heath LS, Birdsey RA (2003) National-scale biomass estimators for United States tree species. For Sci 49:12–35

Jenkins JC, Chojnacky DC, Heath LS, Birdsey R (2004) Comprehensive database of diameter-based biomass regressions for North American tree species. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, General technical report NE-319, pp 1–45

Joosten R, Schumacher J, Wirth C, Schulte A (2004) Evaluating tree carbon predictions for beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in western Germany. For Ecol Manage 189:87–96

Keith H, Barrett D, Keenan R (2000) Review of allometric relationships for estimating woody biomass for New South Wales, the Australian Capital Territory, Victoria, Tasmania, and South Australia, National Carbon Accounting System technical report 5B. Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, 114 pp

Lehtonen A (2005) Estimating foliage biomass for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) plots. Tree Physiol 25:803–811

Lehtonen A, Mäkipää R, Heikkinen J, Sievänen R, Liski J (2004) Biomass expansion factors (BEFs) for Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch according to stand age for boreal forests. For Ecol Manage 188:211–224

Levy PE, Hale SE, Nicoll BC (2004) Biomass expansion factors and root:shoot ratios for coniferous tree species in Great Britain. Forestry 77:421–430

Marklund LG (1987) Biomass functions for Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) in Sweden. Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet. Rapporter-Skog 43:1–127

Marklund LG (1988) Biomassafunktioner för tall, gran och björk i Sverige. Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet (in Swedish). Rapporter-Skog 45:1–73

Monni S, Peltoniemi M, Palosuo T, Lehtonen A, Mäkipää R, Savolainen I (2006) Role of forest carbon stock changes in the uncertainty of greenhouse gas inventories—the case of Finland. Clim Change (in press)

Muukkonen P (2005) Generalized allometric volume and biomass equations for some European tree species. Eur J For Sci (in press)

NIR Hungary (2004) National Inventory Report for Hungary 2002. http://www.unfccc.de

Pan Y, Luo T, Birdsey R, Hom J, Melillo J (2004) New estimates of carbon storage and sequestration in China’s forests: effects of age–class and method on inventory-based carbon estimation. Clim Change 67.2-3:211–236. DOI 10.1007/s10584-004-2799-5

Pařez J, Žlábek I, Kopřiva J (1990) Tabulky pro výpočet základních objemových jednotek v porostech hlavních dřevin (in Czech). Forestry/Lesnictví 36(6):479–508

Parresol BR (1999) Assessing tree and stand biomass: a review with examples and critical comparisons. For Sci 45:573–593

Pastor J, Aber JD, Melillo JM (1983/1984) Biomass prediction using generalized allometric regressions for some northeast tree species. For Ecol Manage 7:265–274

Patenaudea G, Hillb RA, Milne R, Gaveaud DLA, Briggsa BBJ, Dawsona BBJ (2004) Quantifying forest above ground carbon content using LiDAR remote sensing. Remote Sens Environ 93:368–380

Phillips D, Brown S, Schroeder P, Birdsey R (2000) Toward error analysis of large-scale forest carbon budgets. Global Ecol Biogeogr 9(4):305–314

Reichle DE (ed) (1982) Dynamic properties of forest ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, London

Satoo T, Madgwick HAI (1982) Forest biomass. Forestry Sciences Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk, The Hague, 152 pp

Schroeder P, Brown S, Mo J, Birdsey R, Cieszewski C (1997) Biomass estimation for temperate broadleaf forests of the United States using inventory data. For Sci 43:424–434

Smith JE, Heath LS, Jenkins JS (2003) Forest volume-to-biomass models and estimates of mass for live and standing dead trees of U.S. forests. USDA Forest Service, General technical report NE-298

Sprugel DG (1983) Correcting for bias in log-transformed allometric equations. Ecology 64:209–210

Ter-Mikaelian MT, Korzukhin MD (1997) Biomass equations for sixty-five North American tree species. For Ecol Manage 97:1–24

Tritton LM, Hornbeck JW (1982) Biomass equations for major trees species of the Northeast. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Northeastern Forest Experiment “Station, General technical report NE-69, 46 pp

Wirth C, Schulze ED, Schwalbe G, Tomczyk S, Weber G, Weller E, Böttcher H, Schumacher J, Vetter J (2003) Dynamik der Kohlenstoffvorräte in den Wäldern Thüringens. Abschlussbericht zur 1. Phase des BMBF-Projektes “Modelluntersuchung zur Umsetzung des Kyoto-Protokolls”. Max-Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, p 328

Wirth C, Schumacher J, Schulze E-D (2004) Generic biomass functions for Norway spruce in central Europe—a meta-analysis approach toward prediction and uncertainty estimation. Tree Physiol 24:121–139

Zianis D, Mencuccini M (2004) On simplifying allometric analyses of forest biomass. For Ecol Manage 187:311–332

Zianis D, Muukkonen P, Mäkipää R, Mencuccini M (2005) Biomass and stem volume equations for tree species in Europe. Silva Fennica Monographs 4, 63 pp