Indigenous Peoples and Third Sector Research: Indigenous Data Sovereignty as a Framework to Improve Research Practices
Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations - Tập 34 - Trang 100-107 - 2022
Tóm tắt
Indigenous communities have historically been some of the most researched communities around the globe. But much of this research has caused great harm to Indigenous peoples. In response to these harmful and abusive research practices, Indigenous leaders and scholars have envisioned new research principles, practices, methodologies, and policies that center Indigenous peoples, values, worldviews, governance and knowledge systems: Indigenous data sovereignty. This article examines the current state of third sector research relating to Indigenous peoples. We find that Indigenous communities are largely absent from third sector research and there are significant issues with how third sector research conceptualizes Indigenous peoples. We introduce Indigenous data sovereignty as a demand and framework of Indigenous communities aimed at supporting more equitable research practices and pathways to advance research with and for—and not on—Indigenous communities.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Assil, R., Kim, M., & Waheed, S. (2015). An introduction to research justice. Oakland, CA: DataCenter.
Barker, A. J. (2009). The contemporary reality of Canadian imperialism: Settler colonialism and the hybrid colonial state. American Indian Quarterly, 33(3), 325.
Biolsi, T., & Zimmerman, L. J. (1997). Indians and anthropologists: Vine Deloria, Jr., and the critique of anthropology. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Carroll, S. R., Garba, I., Figueroa-Rodríguez, O. L., Holbrook, J., Lovett, R., Materechera, S., Parsons, M., Raseroka, K., Rodriguez-Lonebear, D., Rowe, R., Sara, R., Walker, J. D., Anderson, J., & Hudson, M. (2020). The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance. Data Science Journal, 19(1), 43.
Cobo, JM. (1986). Study of the problem of discrimination against Indigenous populations. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Geneva: United Nations.
Cook-Lynn, E. (2001). Anti-Indianism in modern America: A voice from Tatekeya’s earth. University of Illinois Press.
Cook-Lynn, E. (2004). The Lewis and Clark story, the captive narrative, and the pitfalls of Indian history. Wicazo Sa Review, 19(1), 21–33.
Coombes, A. E. (2006). Rethinking settler colonialism: History and memory in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and South Africa. Manchester University Press.
Cram, F. (2014). Measuring Maori Wellbeing. MAI Journal, 3(1), 18–32.
Dangl, B. (2019). The five hundred year rebellion: Indigenous movements and the decolonization of history in Bolivia. AK Press.
De Tocqueville, A. (2003). Democracy in America (Vol. 10). Regnery Publishing.
Deloria, V. (1969). Custer died for your sins: An Indian Manifesto. University of Oklahoma Press.
Denzin, N. K., Yvonna, S. L., & Linda, T. S. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of Critical and Indigenous Methodologies. Sage.
Dunbar-Ortiz, R. (2014). An Indigenous peoples’ history of the United States. Beacon Press.
Durie, M. (2006). Measuring Māori wellbeing, New Zealand treasury guest lecture series. Wellington: New Zealand Treasury.
First Nations Development Institute. (2016). A case for the native nonprofit sector: Advocating for cultural, economic and community change. Longmont: First Nations Development Institute.
Fletcher, M. L. (2006). The iron cold of the Marshall trilogy. North Dakota Law Review., 82, 627.
Fredericks, B., et al. (2011). Engaging the practice of indigenous yarning in action research. ALAR: Action Learning and Action Research Journal, 17(2), 12–24.
Frymer, P. (2011). Building an American empire: Territorial expansion in the antebellum era. UC Irvine Law Review, 1, 913.
Garrison, N. A. (2013). Genomic justice for native Americans: Impact of the havasupai case on genetic research. Science, Technology and Human Values, 38(2), 201–223.
Geia, L. K., Hayes, B., & Usher, K. (2013). Yarning/aboriginal storytelling: Towards an understanding of an indigenous perspective and its implications for research practice. Contemporary Nurse, 46(1), 13–17.
Haozous, E. A., Eschiti, V., Lauderdale, J., Hill, C., & Amos, C. (2010). Use of the talking circle for Comanche women’s breast health education. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 21(4), 377–385.
Harding, S., & Norberg, K. (2005). New feminist approaches to social science methodologies: An introduction. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(4), 2009–2015.
Kaye, F. W. (2000). Little squatter on the Osage diminished reserve: Reading Laura Ingalls Wilder’s Kansas Indians. Great Plains Quarterly, 20, 123–140.
Kovach, M. E. (2010). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts. University of Toronto Press.
Kukutai, T., & Taylor, J. (2016). Indigenous data sovereignty: Toward an agenda. Australian National University Press.
Mahuika, R. (2008). Kaupapa Māori theory is critical and anti-colonial. MAI Review, 3(4), 1–16.
Mamo, D., ed. (2019). “China.” In Indigenous World 2021, Copenhagen, Denmark: International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs, 194–203. Accessed 14 Oct 2021. https://www.iwgia.org/en/china/3425-iw2019-china.html.
McQueen, A., & Hendrix, B. A. (2017). Tocqueville in Jacksonian Context: American Expansionism and Discourses of American Indian Nomadism in Democracy in America. Perspectives on Politics, 15(3), 663–677.
Research Data Alliance International Indigenous Data Sovereignty Interest Group. (2019). “CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance.” The Global Indigenous Data Alliance. www.GIDA-global.org
Rubin P. (2004). Indian Givers the Havasupai trusted the white man to help with a diabetes epidemic. Instead, ASU tricked them into bleeding for academia. Phoenix New Times. 27, 2004.
Salway Black, S. (1998). The emerging sector: Nonprofits in Indian country. Longmont: First Nations Development Institute.
Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. University of Otago Press.
Statistics New Zealand. (2015). Ngā Tohu o Te Ora: The Determinants of Life Satisfaction for Māori 2013. Wellington: Statistics New Zealand.
Sterling, R. L. (2011). Genetic Research among the Havasupai: A Cautionary Tale. AMA Journal of Ethics, 13(2), 113–117.
Tsosie, R. (2020). The legal and policy dimensions of Indigenous Data Sovereignty. In M. Walter, T. Kukutai, S. R. Carroll, & D. Rodriguez-Lonebear (Eds.), Indigenous data sovereignty and policy (pp. 204–225). Routledge.
United States Indigenous Data Sovereignty Network. (2020). Principles of Indigenous Data Governance. https://usindigenousdata.org/
Walker, S., Eketone, A., & Gibbs, A. (2006). An exploration of kaupapa Maori research, its principles, processes and applications. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 9(4), 331–344.
Walter, M. (2006). The nature of social science research. Social research methods: An Australian perspective (pp. 1–28). Oxford University Press.
Walter, M., & Andersen, C. (2013). Indigenous statistics: A quantitative research methodology. Left Coast Press.
Walter, M., Kukutai, T., Carroll, S. R., & Rodriguez-Lonebear, D. (Eds.). (2020). Indigenous Data Sovereignty and Policy. Routledge.
Walter, M., & Suina, M. (2019). Indigenous data, indigenous methodologies and indigenous data sovereignty. International Journal of Social Research Methodology., 22(3), 233–243.
Wilson, S. (2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Fernwood Press.
Wishart, D. M. (1995). Evidence of surplus production in the nation prior to removal. The Journal of Economic History, 55(1), 120–138.
Yashar, D. J. (2005). Contesting Citizenship in Latin America: The Rise of Indigenous Movements and the Postliberal Challenge. Cambridge University Press.